Posted on 09/22/2020 3:32:45 PM PDT by BruceDeitrickPrice
Cursive has been controversial for years. The striking thing is that the Education Establishment feels really, really strongly about cursive. They hate it! But why are they so emotional?
One professor of education stated emphatically: "Teaching cursive handwriting is an outdated waste of time."
A second professor of education, quoted in the New York Times, was equally dogmatic: "Districts and states should not mandate the teaching of cursive. Cursive should be allowed to die."
You are hearing the imperious voice of an impatient Education Establishment. They do not want to discuss pros and cons. They want to have a funeral and bury this nuisance from the past. Cursive is no darn good, now do what they say.
On the other side of the divide, many phonics experts think that cursive is essential. Most importantly, it makes children focus on the shapes of the letters. Literacy happens faster and more permanently when phonics is complemented by cursive.
When you have neither phonics nor cursive (and this is the official recommendation of our Education Establishment) you have almost no literacy at all. Isn't that an intriguing convergence?
Apparently our professors of education want exactly this sad outcome. They got rid of phonics starting in 1931. Just as astonishing, they have waged an endless war against it ever since, even though their own ideas produced dismal results. US literacy rates are low; millions of functional illiterates have been created. Isn't it reasonable to guess that illiteracy, at the end of the day, is a strategic goal of our Progressive professors?
Imagine their indignation when non-credentialed amateurs try to use cursive to pull phonics back from the grave. They have told us for 80 years that phonics is bad for kids, cursive is a waste of time, and that should be the end of the discussion.
Imagine the gloomy frustration they feel when peasants insist on disobeying. Arguably, the whole point of eliminating phonics and cursive is to make the peasants less literate and easier to control.
Reading is the most important skill but our Education Establishment succeeded in crippling it with a single stroke. They get a lot of bad press from killing phonics; but that's a price they don't seem to mind paying. There is now a counter-attack on behalf of phonics; many people say the balance of evidence is all for phonics. But our Education Establishment shouts, back off. They want cooperative, interdependent children. Too much literacy gets in the way of their social engineering schemes.
So that's the battlefield any time the cursive debate is introduced. Cursive is like waving a red flag at a bull. All the official experts rush out to denounce cursive in dramatic terms. Maybe it's my imagination but I think I can feel their desperation.
They must have figured out that once children learn cursive, they will inevitably figure out phonics for themselves. They become accustomed to seeing letters and syllables; they think it's normal to read left to right.
Our professors of education don't want to lose control of reading instruction, which means they must keep denouncing cursive. But none of the reasons they mention have anything to do with why they hate cursive.
Cursive works, that's why they hate it. Phonics works, that's why they hate it. Any ordinary person may have difficulty even guessing why the Education Establishment kicked out phonics. You might assume they would want reading; truth is, they don't want reading. Assume that and then everything they do makes sense.
The proper way to teach English reading is with phonics, not sight-words, but they have kept sight-words in the schools for 80 years. When children don't learn to read in those early grades, you know they can't read vocabulary from Geography or History or Science. So what are they doing all day? Not much. But the Kings of Chutzpah will tell us, there is simply no time to teach cursive!
When people go into teaching, you can probably assume they love education. But the people at the top? You should probably assume they hate education. What they love is social engineering. Education for them is just one part of an ideological machinery that most of us don't know exists. Education, real education, gets in their way.
On the good side, their irritation tells you exactly the direction you should go if you want improvement in K-12.
Get rid of the goofy theories and methods that they love so much. In particular, eliminate any version of Sight-words, any version of Common Core, and any version of Constructivism All of these things have multiple names because the professors want to keep us confused. That is something they do really well.
––––––––––––––––
Bruce Deitrick Price explains education theories on his site Improve-Education.org. His newest book is "Saving K-12 – What happened to our public schools? How do we fix them?"
© Bruce Deitrick Price
Penmanship develops patience and tenacity. Also an appreciation for one’s own writing style, such as how one chooses to cross a ‘t’ or loop a ‘q’. Good penmanship is a thing of quiet beauty. And then there’s chickenscratch...which is not.
“By the way, the students in that 8th grade class couldn’t print either.”
Our educational system has permanently handicapped multitudes with their teaching fads and stupidity.
Oops. . .make that students weren’t kidding. . .I hate boo boo’s like that.
So children will never be able to read our founding documents etc.
Cursive writing has long been associated with the elites.
To be ‘Lettered,’ was considered important. It didn’t just mean to have book knowledge in general...it included the ability to write the thoughts, meanings, and intentions out in a coherent manner.
I am aware of various keystrokes (caps?) that can be ordered to replace what comes with the normal keyboard. It’d be a wonderful idea for a school system to order Cursive caps to replace the Print caps. The students have to learn Cursive. Having to ability to recognize it on the keyboard would bring them a step closer to being able to write Cursive as they’d be familiar with its form.
My fingers tend to lock up as I write with Cursive, simply due to aging. I will often rotate in letters between Cursive and Print. When my mother was alive she would get a kick out of my letters because not only would they go from Cursive to Print back to Cursive, the direction of the slant would be changing as well merely depending on my thoughts.
LOL
It must be racist and misogynistic -
FWIW our local public school still teaches cursive although there are a few kids who seem to slip by. Cursive, besides being a characteristic of individualism—one’s handwriting is pretty much unique—also allows rapid writing, like in taking notes during class. Do college students still take notes?
I’ve heard people say that if kids can’t read cursive they can’t read the Constitution so wouldn’t surprise me that the lefties running schools don’t teach it. Both my boys learned cursive and print at the same time. It’s one of the reasons I liked Abeka curriculum at an early age. I also stuck with Abeka history throughout high school.
I bet they can read it if they Google US Constitution. How many people read the constitution for the first time in the original script, or did they read it for the first time like I did in a junior high civics textbook.
I have thought for a while that people are being unlearned all over
We’ll go back to people making their mark. Cursive will become hieroglyphics.
Because I can’t draw.
They don’t even teach typing anymore.
With the advent of computers, kids teach themselves to type before they go to school. Word programs automatically center and set margins.
There are MANY legal documents a person might have to sign in their adult lifetimes....
NONE of which will accept a printed name.
This will backfire.
There are a number of texts in cursive, though. The gilded edges on old books were turned toward the sun in order to preserve the bindings. Many libraries of older books didn’t know what all the libraries had.
A small curio shop in Madrid, for instance, had a book whose pages were being used one by on as toilet paper. It turned out that the book was one of Phillip II’s records from back in the planning of the Armada. The owner couldn’t read the book, and voila.
Founding documents for us in one sense goes back beyond the Magna Carta. My two cents.
my sons all learned cursive - it was a great help when others who blew it off as a waste of time needed to be shown how to sign their names for SATs
To me, cursive is kinda like learning an “art”....
We have a 1721 edition of the Magna Carta. .there is handwriting on a flyleaf that I cannot read...in old English I guess
I remember taking phonics and cursive in grade school. This was the sixties.
I got away from cursive when I dove into the digital world and did more typing than writing.
My handwriting subsequently degraded. And now, with an electronic pencil, I’m starting to get back into writing, in cursive.
It’s crazy world.
When I hit Engineering school, in the first lecture I took notes in cursive - and when I got home I couldn’t read them at all!!What was I to do? My only recourse was to print all my notes. I use cursive pretty much exclusively for my signature. But I don’t use ALL CAPS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.