We're not sure how we'd prove that to you. 
Posted on 08/08/2021 9:08:04 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
>H4>WHAT WAS CLAIMED The Covid-19 vaccines contain graphene oxide.
The MHRA ( Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency ) has told us that none of the Covid-19 vaccines in current use contain graphene oxide
A widely shared Facebook post claims that vaccines contain “Graphene Oxide Nano Particles” and that these can reassemble on command and travel to any part of the body.
Nanoparticles are a generic term for very small particles which are found in nature, or can be man-made. They are used in medicine, and a particular type called a lipid nanoparticle is used in both the Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines (which have been approved for use in the UK).
Graphene oxide is another type of nanoparticle but as we have written previously, the Covid-19 vaccines currently in use do not contain graphene oxide. The MHRA ( Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency) told Full Fact “there is no graphene oxide in any of the authorised vaccines”.
Professor Penny Ward, chair of the Education and Standards Committee at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Medicine reiterated this.
She explained that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines use lipid nanoparticles in the envelope which transports the mRNA. She also said that the lipid nanoparticles used in the vaccines have been shown in animal studies to mostly stay at the injection site and in the lymphatic system where immune responses to the vaccine occur.
Dr Stephen Griffin, a virologist at Leeds University, told Full Fact that lipid nanoparticles used in the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines are different, and behave differently, to metal or carbon nanoparticles. He explained that the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines are “specifically designed to interact, and fuse with the membranes of the cells within the muscle into which they are injected…as such, the vast majority of the material is absorbed at the injection site”.
We have written about claims regarding fertility and nanoparticles before.
The post ends by saying: “Just wait until 5gee is PROPERLY cranked up to the Military wave.” We have written many times about how 5G does not cause, exacerbate or have anything to do with Covid-19.
This article is part of our work fact checking potentially false pictures, videos and stories on Facebook. You can read more about this—and find out how to report Facebook content—here.
For the purposes of that scheme, we’ve rated this claim as false because the Covid-19 vaccines do not contain graphene oxide and there is no evidence that 5G is dangerous to vaccine recipients.
Ah, the fact checkers tell us what’s real.
That's a baldfaced lie, refuted by mouse studies published in the British Medical Journal months ago;
by an internal report from Pfzier showing the lipid nanoparticles accumulating all over the body including the ovaries
by a Harvard University study which measured spike protein in the blood 24 hours after people got the jab
and by pathologists examining the bodies of people who got the jab and then died.
And who the heck is “Full Fact”? Credentials? History? Ownership?
Sorry, can’t believe this.
Aren’t you confusing two things? The lipid envelop is not the same as the spike protein.
Yeh sure! 😆
How does one go about proving to a bunch of brain dead morons that there is no graphene oxide in the vaccines? Is it even worth one’s time?
Bttt
We will all be grateful if you could provide the links for what you just said. That is:
1) The Mouse studies from the BMJ
2) The Internal report from Pfizer
3) The Harvard University study
4) Reports of Pathologist who examined the bodies of people who dies from the jab.
It would be great to consolidate all these links in one place.
Thank you.
There are a lot of people on this forum who will read the headline (the headline ONLY, not the article) and write
1. Who believes such experts.
2. I heard on a radio station that there is graphene something, so it must be true.
3. Your overwhelming facts that they don’t contain graphene oxide is too much, you must be covering up something.
4. It’s all a great conspiracy, ignore the facts, see the real (ie the loon) picture.
RE: And who the heck is “Full Fact”? Credentials? History? Ownership?
Here is their introduction to themselves:
“Is it even worth one’s time?”
no ... vaccine graphene oxide is nuevo chem-trails ...
Oh come on now - the mere fact that someone would deny this absolute stupidity is just further proof it is true! Don’t you know that?
They will invent something else soon enough. Previously it was mRNA with apparent supernatural powers - then came the graphene oxide and 5G. Can it get more absurd? You bet.
It takes a saline diluent solution to prepare one vial of vaccine to be reconstituted for six innoculations. The saline diluent is the perfect carrier for graphene oxide if it were to be included. The fact checker does not state that the diluent is free of graphene oxide.
The reports from spain note that the graphene oxide they state as having been found is in the vaccine that is fully reconstituted for innoculation.
It remains an open question until a legitimate analysis facility confirms that the diluent does not contain contaminants of any type, it seems.
Someone needs to explain all of the biomagnetism then.
guess all those videos of magnets sticking to people and arms setting off metal detectors are fake too.
It carries the mRNA which tells the body to make the spike protein.
Tell me how the spike protein gets into cells away from the injection site when those cells don’t have an ACE2 receptor, and/or when the spike protein created at the behest of the mRNA has two consecutive prolines so it can bind with the ACE2 receptor but not enter the cell...
My eyes don't like lies.
We're not sure how we'd prove that to you.
Uh, well, yes...indeed they would be. You actually believe that nonsense?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.