Posted on 12/13/2022 9:25:42 AM PST by Jan_Sobieski
Those ‘under the age of 50 who took the vaccine now have a 49% higher mortality rate,’ and individuals who received just one dose of the shots, ‘have an approximately 145% worse mortality rate,' said analyst Josh Stirling. ‘That ends up being something like 600,000 excess deaths per year in the United States.’
A highly acclaimed insurance analyst reported that “the best statistics we have” reveal those who accepted the experimental gene-base COVID vaccine “have a 26% higher mortality rate,” including 49% for those under 50, and 145% for those who accepted just one dose of a two-dose regimen.
Josh Stirling from “Insurance Collaboration to Save Lives” presented at U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson’s roundtable discussion yesterday titled COVID-19 Vaccines: What They Are, How They Work and Possible Causes of Injuries.
The newly re-elected Republican from Wisconsin hosted a broad selection of scientists, researchers, physicians and medical experts to report and discuss information related to the controversial experimental injections and the apparent grave malfeasance of government officials, pharmaceutical companies, and media corporations.
Stirling, whose bio states he “has been recognized as a top analyst by Institutional Investor and the Financial Times,” provided “one chart that tells the whole story” in his four-minute presentation.
According to UK statistics, the people of that nation “who took the vaccine have a 26% higher mortality rate,” he said. “The people who are under the age of 50 who took the vaccine now have a 49% higher mortality rate. And worst of all, the people who only took one dose of the vaccine have an approximately 145% worse mortality rate...”
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
When will we see the results of this in life insurance premiums? You gotta figure actuaries will be all over this.
Dats da one
After all those ‘extra death rate’ victims die off, will the death rate return to normal levels???
AND
EFFECTIVE
Blasphemous. Ministry of non-state approved information will be setting an appointment for your ruin.
600,000 excess deaths per year is not nearly enough to achieve their goal of a half billion living world wide.
IBFR$$’s
That's odd. You would think after giving over 250M Americans at least one shot this increased mortality rate would show up in the excess death data. But it hasn't.
We lost 600k? Didn’t Schmucky Schumer assure us that with millions of illegal aliens streaming across our border, un-vaxxed, our dwindling population will still be in great shape.....especially once they make it legal for illegals to vote.
“People who took only one dose of the vaccine have an approximately 145% worse mortality rate.”
The initial dose does quite a number on the immune system, making one particularly susceptible to contracting COVID, for a period of time thereafter, and suffering an adverse outcome accordingly. We witnessed this very thing play out in the late summer/early fall of 2021, as a consequence of the Biden administration's full-throated campaign in favor of vaccine mandates for people to attend college, to keep their job, etc. Many people who had previously avoided the vax altogether were forced into it.
And what did we see? Well, for starters, "all cause" mortality in the U.S. in August 2021 was 135% of expected deaths. In pre-vax August 2020, "all cause" mortality had come in at 123% of expected deaths.
The difference was even more stark for the month of September. "All cause" mortality in September 2021 was 141% of expected deaths. A year earlier, in pre-vax September 2020, the figure was 116% of expected deaths.
And much of this excess mortality seems to have been attributable to COVID itself. Nationwide, deaths involving COVID in August 2021 were up 63%, compared to pre-vax August 2020. Deaths involving COVID in September 2021 were up a whopping 231%, compared to pre-vax September 2020.
The data speak for themselves.
Beta test.
Question is will the insurance companies continue to silently eat loses to hide the government, healthcare and big pharma’s lies? If you see a life insurance companies bailout “due to covid” you know the fix is in.
Bkmk
Semimojo
Huh? You forgot to show your supposed evidence.
I was hoping to see proof of your claim.
Of what?
Jan_Sobieski "A highly acclaimed insurance analyst reported that “the best statistics we have” reveal those who accepted the experimental gene-base COVID vaccine
“have a 26% higher mortality rate,” including 49% for those under 50, and 145% for those who accepted just one dose of a two-dose regimen."
" ‘That ends up being something like 600,000 excess deaths per year in the United States.’ "
Then you cite the 'hot link' to the CDC Dashboard : "Excess Deaths Associated with COVID-19" a proof of the veracity of your data.
You need to consider the source of your information - the CDC, itself !
Is this the same CDC that promised that if you got the vaccine, you wouldn't get infected;
and later said that you need to get the vaccine so that you would pass the infection to others ?
And later the same CDC said you don't need an N-95 mask; and then later recanted that statement.
And then we find out two years later that the Covid-19 "vaccine" wasn't even tested against Covid infection by the Pfizer CEO, prior to its release to the general public.
The FDA/CDC are still pushing availability of the vaccine despite peoples reluctance to take it.
Is this the same FDA/CDC that granted blanket immunity / indemnification to the manufacturers for adverse consequences arising from the "experimental" vaccine ?
Reality Check ! - I honestly trust the insurance industry's actuarial tables more so than some bureaucratic from the CDC.
When the CDC receives 65% of their funding from the same Big Pharma that they are supposed to investigate and regulate, I rightfully question their independence.
The CDC has already blown its credibility due to deception ignoring the truth, and outright deceit !
The actuarial tables demonstrate the insurance industries actual payout rate, which they back up monetarily ($$).
The CDC data is based on statistical analysis of what data a CDC bureaucratic wants to be released .
An old Adage : "Statistics don't lie,
but, .. statisticians do lie ".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.