Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aw Crap....(An explanation for greater COVID infection rate for the most VAXXed and Boosted)
Market-Ticker.org ^ | 26 Dec, 2022 | Karl Denninger

Posted on 12/27/2022 6:41:40 AM PST by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last
To: gleeaikin
Nutrition is absolutely critical. When I saw the graph for incidence of death from SARS-CoV-2 for 60 year olds and it dropped to zero once vitamin D levels were over 34 ng/ml, I jumped right on it. By the time my wife brought BA.1 home from her dispatch office, my vitamin D was at 170 ng/ml (by LabCorp blood test). My doctor recommended backing off to get it under 120 ng/ml. It was 10 days of malaise, fatigue, runny nose, razor blade sore throat, minor 99.2 "fever", one incident of dizziness/near fainting in the shower and one incident of blood in my urine. The only bad outcome in my home was my senior poodle who caught BA.1 from me and died in two days. The other 8 dogs, 2 cats and other pets had no issues.

I won't bore you with my long list of daily supplements, but they seem to be getting the job done. The BA.1 was my first illness in the last 20 years.

101 posted on 12/27/2022 1:25:38 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: enumerated
Denis Rancourt specifically chose all cause mortality to avoid cherry picking. He was using Canadian data (similar seen in the USA). Extrapolating to the whole globe may be more difficult as not every country has well established life insurance businesses with tightly monitored actuarial data.
102 posted on 12/27/2022 1:29:46 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

Move over Typhoid Mary, we now have Covid Carrie.


103 posted on 12/27/2022 1:31:17 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I agree. It’s senseless.


104 posted on 12/27/2022 1:33:20 PM PST by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

Related

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/the-wrong-antibody-monday-december?r=5fm5j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email


105 posted on 12/27/2022 1:38:11 PM PST by combat_boots ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Posted the wrong link

https://twitter.com/JesseKellyDC/status/1607851199935688704?cxt=HHwWgMDR_biJntAsAAAA


106 posted on 12/27/2022 1:44:47 PM PST by combat_boots ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber
"None of the western world Covid jabs do this on purpose. They were all crafted to use only part of the virus, and the reason for that is past experience trying to create coronavirus vaccines all ended in failure with many of them producing wild enhancement of the infection instead of protection and in animal testing reliably killed the animals."

That's a shame, that your buddy Karl shot yourself in the foot on a foot fault, because no one on FreeRepublic has ever been able to authoritatively cite anything even close to "animal testing reliably killed the animals", and "wild enhancement of the infection" has amounted to exactly one South African homo, thusly:

"The mouse story also doesn't account for the two-dozen novel mutations (non-Beta and non-Delta) in Omicron; and neither does a re-engineering attempt, which in doing so, they would have patently avoided novel mutations IF in fact they could have figured out, in the first place, how to neutralize the cytokine storm and the 'shattered glass' pneumonia, by taking down the ACE2 and TMPRSS2 affinities.

The mouse story is, at the end of the day, a cover story so that the fact that a South African AIDS patient generated Omicron, is called into question (a la modified limited hangout).

A South African doctor discovered Omicron's Patient Zero, who was an AIDS-riddle f@g.

Two competing theories emerge from there: one is that he was untreated, which would put his immune system somewhere short of death; the other one is that he was on PrEP fostering long-haul COVID.

Both scenarios have viral evolutionary advantages, but prefer the PrEP + (the application and failure of) remdesivir, which subsequently merged Beta (almost solely a SaF bug) + Delta = Omicron."


107 posted on 12/27/2022 1:55:55 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Nahhh I’ve heard you say before that you love the Trumpsters. Don’t deny it now.


108 posted on 12/27/2022 2:04:41 PM PST by Theophilus (It's fake and defective)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
Wow, this thread is so full of stupid, I literally laughed out loud.

You Freeptards obsessed with the vaxxes, vaxxi, vaxxines, might just as well be on the goddamn PLA payroll.

The true threat, is that Freeptards are pimping the vaccines as a distraction to draw attention away from China committing a global Act of War by intentionally releasing their designer bioweapon. Period.

The Chinese MUST give up all of their data on their own goddamn bioweapon or swim in radioactive glass. Them's the choices.

Pfizer internal docs show their own debate, the Pfizer-BioNTech 'genius' who sketched out the design of the spike protein vax was quickly made to understand that is was underpowered. Underpowered. Do you all f-cking get it? Underpowered. And that the only reason Moderna barely impacted DELTA was that it wasn't as underpowered as Pfizer.

Under-powered. UNDERPOWERED. Do you all GET IT? FFS, the PLA unleashed the world's first biodesigned bioweapon in late 2019, manufactured with a chimeric HIV shell, and an appended furin cleavage site -- and not one of you, not ONE. SINGLE. POST. in this pathetic thread acknowledges that unassailable FACT.

*spit*

*spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit**spit*

109 posted on 12/27/2022 2:21:15 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy; Qiviut; Jane Long; Myrddin; ransomnote
I thought you you weren't intelligent or honest enough for the ride.

Turns out I was right, in spades: and it is for that reason, people are so reluctant to "put up or shut up" : people on the web who call for "put up or shut up" INVARIABLY end up saying, "so that's your best shot, eh? Well I unilaterally declare it wasn't good enough, so DISPROVEN / MISINFORMATION / REEEEE!"

(Same thing happens arguing with autofellatory atheists, for example).

There are several different areas extant in medicine which tie into the whole COVID-1984 phenomenon.

Epidemiology -- empirically tracking how diseases spread.
Clinical practice -- gosh, this guy's sick, how do we help him?
Molecular biology -- what's going on at the physical/chemical level in the body at the molecular level which manifests as this disease state?

"Vaccines" touch on all of these.

What happened is some epidemiologists PREDICTED possible fallout from "vaccines" (the clot shots) at an epidemiological level, based on past experience with viruses.

Some other people predicted the potential for problems at the individual level with clot shots, and then at the population level, based on prior work with coronaviruses in animal models.

Other people looked at the meager/sparse results of tests on these jabs, and predicted other problems.

Lo and behold, AFTER the fact, doctors, scientists, and clinicians tracked real people given the mRNA shots and tracked what went wrong: which were not all the things which had been predicted: and some of which were not obvious, but should have been, in 20-20 hindsight.

The detailed articles which you obviously couldn't follow, were tracking the detailed molecular causes, for the the effects which were observed after the fact, but hadn't been predicted: all the "Scientists" of the sort you quoted, spent the last 2 years wanking off to the phrase "SAFE AND EFFECTIVE". So your accusation fails on "looking for what you want to find" : because if the shots didn't have the observed side effects, there would have been nothing TO explain.

Further, the predictions about the relative counts of the various immunoglobulins, are quite specific, not vague. And they are not models (as the predictions of "OMG we all have to quarantine and get jabbed NOW!" were), so your snark falls flat on that accusation too.

In short, you are utterly and irretrievably wrong.

And you don't even know why, only able to repeat your feeble mantra of "I F'ing Love SCIENCE Because CREDENTIALS are bigger and gooderer" even harder.

Even though science works not through credentials, but disciplined repeatable measurements.

110 posted on 12/27/2022 2:31:52 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
The articles you referenced that I perused did not make that claim. It seems like you created the claim and then went in search of evidence to support it. The beautiful thing about science is that you can find anything you want if you can use vagueness as a criteria.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0262162

says verbatim in the abstract

"Furthermore, despite accounting for only approximately 12%" of the total immunoglobulin mass, collectively igG3 and igM account for approximately 80% of the total neutralization"

and

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciimmunol.ade2798

(which I mentioned in post 85) has a chart which is at the top of this thread.

Which shows that igG3 falls off a cliff after 3 shots.

There's the experimental evidence right there, predicting that immunity from the jabs drops off with multiple jabs.

Which is what has been observed, in the population, not in test tubes.

Your accusation is completely backwards.

111 posted on 12/27/2022 2:41:36 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
Here is the definitive answer to ALL vaxx, this particular article regarding Novavax:

"Ignoring the bat-shit crazy of the original 'article' that mutated into this thread (lol!), the problem with Novavax is that it creates, out of your personal safety net, an RNA-malformed attack squad against spike proteins, without knowing damn good and well whether or not benign, non-Chinese-bioweapon spike proteins prompt any kind of benefits against other virii, against potential infectious cancer-causing agents, etc.; as juxtaposed against what spike proteins do as deliberately enabled/endowed by the scumbag confucian kow-towing godless mandarin Chinese-designer-bioengineered COVID-19 spike protein bioweapon enhancement. The foregoing paragraph is part and parcel of the ongoing problem which the First World, formerly the Free World, deliberately fails to address. The Chinese MUST give up all of their data on their own goddamn bioweapon or swim in radioactive glass. Them's the choices.

112 posted on 12/27/2022 2:45:02 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

You bunch of dumb goblins, run away lofl!!


113 posted on 12/27/2022 2:48:20 PM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I give you much credit, for your patience, and, grace with that one.

You’ve been generous with your time, providing links, explanations, etc.

My first impression was ignorance….then denial…now, I’m convinced it is another plant.

Especially after all that is now coming out daily/hourly, about these $hots.


114 posted on 12/27/2022 2:52:57 PM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 of day. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Well, the information I got firsthand from hospice nurses about their elderly patients who got the shot is that not only are the vaccinated hospice patients dying at a quicker rate but they are seeing younger people with aggressive diseases entering hospice.

My FIL who passed away last month (from dementia) was one of the few who did not get the shot. He was in a memory care last yeqr which had two rounds of covid go through, which he never got. He he did get it this year here with us while on hospice. His worst symptoms were over in 2 days and he was back to baseline in a week. He did not have to go to the hospital.


115 posted on 12/27/2022 4:10:58 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Jane Long

I agree. Anyone who is still trying to argue “safe and effective” is either willfully ignorant or a troll.


116 posted on 12/27/2022 4:13:09 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver
Under-powered. UNDERPOWERED. Do you all GET IT? FFS, the PLA unleashed the world's first biodesigned bioweapon in late 2019, manufactured with a chimeric HIV shell, and an appended furin cleavage site -- and not one of you, not ONE. SINGLE. POST. in this pathetic thread acknowledges that unassailable FACT.

Hey, troll-boi.

WE discussed the furin cleavage site years ago; back when the late Luc Montaigner and David Baltimore -- both Nobel winning virologists -- pointed out that this showed the virus was bioengineered, rather than coming from bat soup at a market.

It's such old news, we take it for granted.

That's why we're no longer discussing it on *this* thread.

117 posted on 12/27/2022 4:54:51 PM PST by grey_whiskers ( (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

“My first impression was ignorance….then denial…now, I’m convinced it is another plant.”

Grin! I might have to borrow your language in the future. cheers


118 posted on 12/27/2022 5:06:51 PM PST by week 71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: week 71

Go right ahead! ;-)


119 posted on 12/27/2022 5:17:00 PM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 of day. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

>>snicker<<

ᓚᘏᗢ


120 posted on 12/27/2022 5:19:54 PM PST by Jane Long (What we were told was a “conspiracy theory” in 2020 is now fact. 🙏🏻 Ps 33:12 of day. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson