Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nikki Haley Is Not A Natural Born Citizen of USA To Constitutional Standards – Not Eligible To Be President - The Post & Email
The Post & Email Newspaper ^ | 30 Jan 2023 | CDR Kerchner (Ret)

Posted on 01/30/2023 10:17:55 AM PST by CDR Kerchner

Nikki Haley fails the three legged stool test!

(Jan. 30, 2023) — Both of Nikki Haley’s parents were not U.S. Citizens when Nikki was born. Nikki Haley was born to a Citizen of India father (minus one stool leg) and to a Citizen of India mother (minus the 2nd stool leg).

The normal path to becoming a naturalized U.S. Citizen takes five years. Nikki Haley was born in 1972 . Her father and mother emigrated from India to Canada and then to the USA in 1969. Thus there was not sufficient time for either of Nikki’s parents to become naturalized U.S. Citizens when Nikki was born in 1972. It is not known at this time to this writer if Nikki’s father and mother ever became naturalized U.S. Citizens. Nikki Haley is not being very transparent on this issue. Even if one or both of her parents did naturalize later after Nikki Haley was born, it would not change Nikki’s birth status. Given Nikki Haley’s year of birth in 1972, and her parents immigration year of 1969 to the USA, she was thus born in the USA to two foreign nationals and thus inherited their respective birth nation’s citizenship when she was born, in addition to being a basic Citizen by being born in the USA to aliens legally domiciled here. Thus Nikki Haley was born with citizenship and required national allegiance at birth to two countries. This is hardly what the founders and framers intended when they selected the “natural born Citizen” requirement for the person who would in the future be permitted to be the President and Commander in Chief of our military, once the founding generation was gone. ... continue reading here: https://www.thepostemail.com/2023/01/30/nikki-haley-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-to-constitutional-standards-not-eligible-to-be-president/

(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2024; afraidofnikki; birther; birthers; constitution; gonikkigo; herewegoagain; ineligible; naturalborncitizen; nbcnightingcircle; nikkihaley
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last
To: Sacajaweau

Native born is not natural born. Citizen perhaps, but not Natural born.


121 posted on 01/30/2023 9:56:36 PM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
Thanks.

-PJ

122 posted on 01/30/2023 10:36:04 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: CDR Kerchner

Born: Nimrata Nikki Randhawa January 20, 1972 (age 51) Bamberg, South Carolina.

Nikki is a natural born citizen of the US. The birth location and citizen status of the parents is moot.


123 posted on 01/31/2023 7:15:15 AM PST by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

In the same chapter Roosevelt writes that both Presidents Jackson and Chester. Arthur both had dual citizenship.

“President Andrew Jackson on this theory could have been pressed for military service in the English army …if he happened to visit England; and Presidents Arthur would have been in the same plight.”


124 posted on 01/31/2023 8:39:07 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
Jackson was grandfathered in under Article II Section 1 since he was born in the United States in 1767 and was a citizen of the United States before the adoption of the Constitution.

-PJ

125 posted on 01/31/2023 8:58:06 AM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960
(or Sally Hemmings)

Humm. The left needs to drag Thomas Jefferson through the mud. Examination of the evidence.

The Jefferson Hemings Myth

Discussion of Jefferson's character.

The Sally Hemmings story

"If the answer to these questions is that Jefferson was simply trying to cover up his illicit relations with Sally Hemings--not to mention the "Congo Harem" he allegedly maintained at Monticello--he deserves to be regarded as one of the most profligate liars and consummate hypocrites ever to occupy the presidency. To give credence to the Sally Hemings story is, in effect, to question the authenticity of Jefferson's faith in freedom, the rights of man, and the innate controlling faculty of reason and the sense of right and wrong. It is to infer that there were no principles to which he was inviolably committed, that what he acclaimed as morality was no more than a rhetorical facade for self-indulgence, and that he was always prepared to make exceptions in his own case when it suited his purpose. In short, beneath his sanctimonious and sententious exterior lay a thoroughly adaptive and amoral public figure--like so many of those of the present day. Even conceding that Jefferson was deeply in love with Sally Hemings does not essentially alter the case: love does not sanctify such an egregious violation of his own principles and preachments and the shifts and dodges, the paltry artifices, to which he was compelled to resort in order to fool the American people. "There is no vice that doth so cover a man with shame," said Francis Bacon, whom Jefferson accounted one of the three greatest men who ever lived, "as to be found false and perfidious.""

126 posted on 01/31/2023 10:43:24 AM PST by Pete from Shawnee Mission ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I don’t think that is the issue. Roosevelt’s point is that Jackson had dual English American citizenship.

While we generally accept that Jackson was born a long the South Carolina/North Carolina border back in 1859 there were questions of whether he was actually born at sea.

https://books.google.com/books?id=Y3sFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA148&dq=was+andrew+jackson+born+at+sea&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&source=gb_mobile_search&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwj55PLo6PL8AhVROEQIHSCMAoIQ6AF6BAgHEAM#v=onepage&q=was%20andrew%20jackson%20born%20at%20sea&f=false


127 posted on 01/31/2023 2:18:12 PM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
The point is that everyone could be considered dual citizens prior to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. That's why the grandfather clause was there to exempt them from the natural born citizen requirement.

Jackson was born in 1767 somewhere in the Carolinas. His parents emigrated from Ireland in 1765.

I'm not sure if the South Carolina constitution had citizenship requirements or not, so I'm assuming that Jackson and his parents were considered citizens of the United States in 1789.

-PJ

128 posted on 01/31/2023 2:41:02 PM PST by Political Junkie Too ( * LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Tell It Right

Obama was ineligible.

His mom was a US citizen. However, to pass that citizenship to her child required that she live in the US continuously for five years after the age of 15.

She lived in Africa and gave birth at age 18, not 20.

Therefore, she could not pass citizenship to Barak assumed his father’s Kenyan citizenship.

The original BC is under lock and key in Kenya. The proof of forged BC documents was ignored.


129 posted on 01/31/2023 8:36:59 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

You are correct! Nikki and K’mala are both native born, not natural born.


130 posted on 01/31/2023 8:43:08 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

If born in the US, the person is a native born citizen.

Constitution requires President to be a natural born citizen, wherein parent is US citizen.


131 posted on 01/31/2023 9:05:27 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson