Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicists Conduct The Most Massive Test Ever of The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox
Science Alert ^ | June 12, 2023 | Michelle Starr

Posted on 06/13/2023 7:53:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv

In the most massive test to date, physicists have probed a major paradox in quantum mechanics and found it still holds even for clouds of hundreds of atoms.

Using two entangled Bose-Einstein condensates, each consisting of 700 atoms, a team of physicists co-led by Paolo Colciaghi and Yifan Li of the University of Basel in Switzerland has shown that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox scales up.

The researchers say this has important implications for quantum metrology – the study of measuring things under quantum theory...

One of the tools we use to close one of the gaps is quantum mechanics, a theory that arose in the early 20th century, championed by physicist Niels Bohr, for describing how atomic and subatomic matter behaves. In this tiny realm, classical physics breaks down; when the old rules no longer apply, new rules must be made.

But quantum mechanics isn't without its flaws, and in 1935, three famous physicists found a significant hole. Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen described the famous Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox.

Nothing can travel faster than light, right? But it gets a bit tricky with quantum entanglement, what Einstein referred to as "spooky action at a distance". This is where you correlate two (or more) particles so that their properties are linked; if one particle, for example, spins one way, the other spins the other way.

These particles retain this link even over large distances, and it's unclear how or why. Scientists do know that if you measure the properties of one particle, you can infer the properties of the other, even over that distance.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencealert.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy; Science
KEYWORDS: alberteinstein; astronomy; borispodolsky; bosepodolskyeinstein; nathanrosen; paradox; physics; quantummechanics; science; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Still from an animation of a NIST quantum entanglement experiment conducted in 2013.
Yiheng Lin/NIST/YouTube
Yiheng Lin/NIST/YouTube

1 posted on 06/13/2023 7:53:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; bajabaja; ...


· List topics · post a topic · subscribe · Google ·

2 posted on 06/13/2023 7:55:14 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpers are Republicans the same way Liz Cheney is a Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

3 posted on 06/13/2023 7:56:04 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

So I wonder if you could separate a Bose-Einstein condensate into two separate clouds and put one in geosynchronous orbit, could you achieve instantaneous communication by changing one cloud and seeing the effects in another?


4 posted on 06/13/2023 8:12:17 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Theoretically, yes.......................


5 posted on 06/13/2023 8:13:11 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

For some reason I thought I might understand some of that.


6 posted on 06/13/2023 8:13:52 AM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Loved that reply. Even though I have a background in some of this, I say that often.


7 posted on 06/13/2023 8:16:55 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

So if you could get the bit rate high enough, you could have a live Zoom meeting from Mars.


8 posted on 06/13/2023 8:17:35 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Or Uranus.......................


9 posted on 06/13/2023 8:18:43 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Red Badger

“Using two entangled Bose-Einstein condensates, each consisting of 700 atoms”

That was my problem. I only used 699 atoms.


10 posted on 06/13/2023 8:26:28 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Donate! Don't just post clickbait!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Yeah....I’m like that guy. Hunh?

(If this paradox raises the cost of a 6-pack of Bud Light, I’m all for it)


11 posted on 06/13/2023 8:29:04 AM PDT by citizen (Put all LBQTwhatever programming on a new subscription service: PERV-TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

You dropped one on the floor..................


12 posted on 06/13/2023 8:29:34 AM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Lol. Nice to hear that. Tx.


13 posted on 06/13/2023 8:31:09 AM PDT by subterfuge (I'm a pure-blood!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

so if a particle is quantumly entangled with another that’s light years away would that communication be instantaneous? I think that’s the goal for this research maybe. And of course quantum computing.


14 posted on 06/13/2023 8:48:00 AM PDT by Samurai_Jack (This is not about hypocrisy, this is about hierarchy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

The old Star Trek “subspace communications?”


15 posted on 06/13/2023 9:06:36 AM PDT by citizen (Put all LBQTwhatever programming on a new subscription service: PERV-TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

No, that won’t work.


16 posted on 06/13/2023 9:19:39 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

No, not even theoretically.


17 posted on 06/13/2023 9:23:40 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Samurai_Jack

No, it’s not. Quantum communication is possible but it cannot transmit any useable information faster than the speed of light.


18 posted on 06/13/2023 9:24:55 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

Or endless PowerPoint sessions from Uranus.


19 posted on 06/13/2023 9:38:15 AM PDT by Noumenon (You're not voting your way out of this. KTF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
No, that won’t work.

Why? If correlative state changes are detectable and repeatable, then its simply a matter of which one is 0 and which one is 1. Plus a clock on each end. Same as measuring voltage on a gate.

20 posted on 06/13/2023 10:04:24 AM PDT by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson