Posted on 04/26/2024 5:48:29 AM PDT by MtnClimber
A new study from a liberal law school claims that global warming, also known as “climate change,” has a greater impact on LGBT couples than on normal couples.
As reported by Fox News, the study from the UCLA School of Law claims that “same-sex couples are more likely to reside in communities with poorer infrastructure and less access to resources. They are, therefore, less prepared to respond and adapt to natural hazards and other climate disruptions.”
The report, authored by analyst Lindsay Mahowald and senior fellow Ari Shaw, goes on to claim that the solution to this “problem” is for the government to “ensure that disaster relief is accessible and administered without discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.”
The authors included suggestions such as access to HIV treatment and financial support specifically for LGBT individuals and homes. Other suggestions included an expansion of the list of sexual preferences that are available on census reports, in order to “increase the scope and granularity of information available on LGBT people, including assessments of climate risk.”
“Policies that mitigate discriminatory housing practices and provide economic relief to LGBT people will bolster the resilience of these communities to climate events,” the report continued.
The report, released earlier this month, was written using data from the U.S. Census and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), ultimately producing a “geographic analysis” of LGBT couples and their proximity to natural disasters. The study found that the 15 counties with the highest percentages of LGBT couples were all located in either coastal or urban areas.
These claims, backed up by little evidence, come after the Biden Administration ramped up its global warming efforts on “Earth Day.” In a video message, Joe Biden announced the creation of the “American Climate Corps,” and pleaded for Americans to join. The White House also rolled out new regulations cutting off at least 13 million acres of federal land from any future oil drilling, as well as $7 billion in grants for solar projects at the state and local level.
The Biden Administration says that the goal of the Climate Corps is to help Americans “find work tackling the climate crisis while gaining the skills necessary for the clean energy and climate resilience workforce of the future.” The first class of the Climate Corps will begin in June of 2024.
They need reparations, lots of reparations.
Virtue Grandstanding is hard.
At what point do they admit it is the wrath of the Lamb that they are in danger of?
A classic!
Other suggestions included an expansion of the list of sexual preferences that are available on census reports,
_______________________
We will be asking about “expanded list of sexual preferences. but we cannot ask about citizenship?!
They need Jesus or they’ll experience eternal warming.
How awful to be at greater risk of suffering from the impacts from an imaginary problem. These idiots have been caught red handed multiple times jiggering data to convince the public that $Trillions need to be transferred into the pockets of leftist organizations and individuals to “save the planet”.
LMAO!!!!
LGBT persons are mentally ill and therefore less prepared to respond and adapt.
They can't hold jobs because of their mental illness and therefore live in communities with poorer infrastructure.
Their desire to live in communities that are 'more accepting' means that they live in cities ruled by Democrats which means that the community services are poorly managed and maintained.
Sorry if you LBGT you are screwed. You are mentally ill and probably live in a Democrat stronghold.
Will it negatively impact their reproduction rate?
Apply enough tortuous logic to a topic and you get this type of crap.
That’s funny
Even global warming is prejudiced!
It is Olympic quality leftist mental gymnastics. I think these people should get a gold medal to go with their case of HIV.
The gist of this ridiculous report is that gay couples, who typically have higher incomes and less expenses like for children, tend to live in cities on both blue coasts, so they’re more at risk from rising sea levels. This conclusion is reached via the same chain of dubious assertions about a nonexistent crisis as every other fake study.
Could that be because they're going to Hell?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.