Skip to comments.
Up All Night: Bill Frist gets serious about judges
(FR mentioned!)
Townhall ^
| 11/13/2003
| Andrew Grossman
Posted on 11/13/2003 11:56:02 AM PST by Qwinn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
The post he references on Free Republic is now over 3800 posts and is found
here Qwinn
1
posted on
11/13/2003 11:56:03 AM PST
by
Qwinn
To: Qwinn
30 hrs of debate does NOT equal "getting serious" about conservative judicial nominees. "Damage control," "hoping this puts the issue to rest till after 04" and "placating the base" on the other hand...
2
posted on
11/13/2003 11:59:57 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: Qwinn
bttt
3
posted on
11/13/2003 12:00:11 PM PST
by
firewalk
To: Qwinn
I'm a bit bugged that an article on a conservative news and views website (Townhall) refers to FreeRepublic as a "right wing" forum. Some may take pride in the lable "right wing," but to me it's a pejorative term. Otherwise, good article.
4
posted on
11/13/2003 12:00:24 PM PST
by
My2Cents
("Well...there you go again.")
To: Qwinn
...Republicans need only stay the course...
To: Qwinn
Don't you just love it when we're mentioned in the news? Must piss the DUmmies off.;-)
6
posted on
11/13/2003 12:01:48 PM PST
by
WinOne4TheGipper
(Progressives- people who seek the right to child sacrifice (to the god of self- convenience).)
To: KantianBurke
exactly. call me when frist gets the cojones to modify the senate rules, otherwise all they've done is stay up way past their bedtime.
To: My2Cents
It's also arguable that FR is no longer right-wing, and hasn't been for quite some time. Middle-of-the-road is more like it.
8
posted on
11/13/2003 12:03:51 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
("A republic, if you can keep it.")
To: ameribbean expat
Personally, I think modifying the senate rules would not necessarily be a good thing. Sure, it would take a lot of testosterone and all, but would it hurt them any more than it hurts us, in the long run?
The article itself mentions that option, and the downside. I definetly think that this is a better option to go with for now. I'm of the opinion that you don't go "nuclear" until you've exhausted all other conventional measures. This was a "conventional" measure that hadn't been tried. If this doesn't work, then there'll be a whole lot more popular support if and when the nuclear option IS tried later, because many more swing voters would agree that everything else had been tried.
Qwinn
9
posted on
11/13/2003 12:06:41 PM PST
by
Qwinn
To: Qwinn; 1Mike; 3catsanadog; ~Vor~; ~Kim4VRWC's~; A CA Guy; A Citizen Reporter; abner; Aeronaut; ...
Well, lookie here: we made the news again!
10
posted on
11/13/2003 12:07:34 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: KantianBurke
The answer is: appoint them during recess, or appoint even more 'controversial' judges during recess in their place, which serves to make the 'real' ones less controversial. Enough is enough! The judges appointed during recess serve until 2004 and as history has spelled out, many have finally gotten formal appointments - Eisenhower and X42 did it, with those results. GROW A PAIR, FOLKS.
To: My2Cents
"I'm a bit bugged that an article on a conservative news and views website (Townhall) refers to FreeRepublic as a "right wing" forum. Some may take pride in the lable "right wing," but to me it's a pejorative term."
That doesn't bother me. One, I don't see it as a pejorative to anyone who isn't a Leftie already, and they're not going to be praising us anyway.
Secondly, I don't have a problem with conservative OR liberal websites identifying any political bias of their sources. That's actually a -good- thing. What only bothers me is when they always mention the "right-wing" bias of their sources and don't identify the bias of "left-wing" sources, or when they add praising modifiers to the left and negative modifiers to the right. Townhall doesn't do that, so their use of such terms doesn't bother me.
Qwinn
12
posted on
11/13/2003 12:10:26 PM PST
by
Qwinn
To: Howlin
Thanks for the ping! I particularly liked the line:
The Democratic Underground wanted to start a thread but neither of their two posters could spell filibuster.
13
posted on
11/13/2003 12:12:55 PM PST
by
Quilla
To: Quilla
Me, too! ROFLMAO!
14
posted on
11/13/2003 12:13:35 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
what if we chumped the democrats into believing it was only 30 hrs. Only th republicans brought mattresses.
15
posted on
11/13/2003 12:17:08 PM PST
by
temijin
To: My2Cents
What, ya' think FR is "a moderate-to-liberal voice for reasoned dialog with the more liberal elements of America's democratic Party?"
Nah, right-wing FR is, and probably always will be, with a strong libertarian seasoning and occasional DU disruptors.
16
posted on
11/13/2003 12:17:16 PM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: temijin
I would absolutely LOVE that. Not waiting for it though.
17
posted on
11/13/2003 12:17:33 PM PST
by
Howlin
To: ysoitanly
Appoint the meanest nastiest far right judges possible during a recess. You just KNOW that at some point, an issue dear to the RATS would come before some of these people and the RATS would get slam dunked. Nuclear option? Don't bother - just do it at recess.
To: Howlin
hope springs eternal
19
posted on
11/13/2003 12:19:28 PM PST
by
temijin
To: temijin
Funny.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson