Posted on 02/15/2004 10:45:42 AM PST by mosel-saar-ruwer
Okay - the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban is set to sunset in September of 2004, two months before the general election:
http://www.awbansunset.com/future.htmlI can see many, many scenarios, but all of them get back to Soccer Moms -vs- NASCAR Dads. Here are two of them:
1) There is another big terrorist attack, the Soccer Moms get scared, and come home to the Republicans. Voter sentiment favors the Second Amendment, self-defense, and self-preservation. Bush supports sunsetting, Kerry supports extension, big win for Bush.I don't think the Assault Weapons Ban will be the pivotal issue - that will almost certainly be the economy and the outsourcing of white collar jobs to Bangalore. But in a number of swing states [Florida, Wisconsin, Oregon], where a few thousand votes determine the Electoral College prize, I think the Assault Weapons Ban may determine which group of voters [Soccer Moms - Kerry, NASCAR Dads - Bush] is energized, and which is demoralized.2) No further terrorist attacks. Further drip, drip, drip of causualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. Voters become complacent about security issues. Possible Columbine-esque school shooting further energizes the anti-defense, anti-security, anti-gun lobby. Teresa Heinz adopts the Assault Weapons Ban as her signature issue; Soccer Moms flock to her. Dubyah and Laura get nervous, betray the NASCAR Dads, and sign on for an Assault Weapons Ban extension. NASCAR Dads are demoralized, stay home. Soccer Moms elect John Kerry.
Your thoughts???
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.