"a dirt road scholar with a degree in BS from the school of hard knocks..."
Posted on 09/13/2004 12:24:51 PM PDT by CHARLITE
Unprecedented Evil Within…
Written by JB Williams
©2004-09-13
It has been clear for some years that the Democratic Party has no pension for truth, and a visibly growing desperation for power. But the American people are witnessing an unbridled Evil within that Party today that is unprecedented, and that’s what makes the blood boil in good old America loving Democrats like Zell Miller.
The DNC thought they could get away with running our nations most liberal senator as a war time Presidential candidate on the basis of his four months in Vietnam, until his fellow soldiers came out of the woodwork challenging his self appointed hero status. Then they thought they could triangulate their attackers by painting 254 decorated Vets as liars and right wing conspirators.
Then former POW’s who were tortured with Kerry’s illegitimate 1971 testimony came forward and have launched their own 45 minute movie detailing the damage done by Kerry’s anti-American grandstanding, and again, the DNC hopes to convince average voters that all of these guys are liars and right wing conspirators as well.
Unable to run a campaign on Kerry achievements in the senate, (because he doesn’t have any), unable to sell Kerry as a man strong on national security, (because his senate record shows he isn’t), and down in the polls as a result of giving the people nothing to vote for, the Party and the candidate have leaped out of the gutter they have been living in and into the sewer, removing all restraints on winning this election, including truth and common decency.
Unable to convince the public that Kerry is a candidate worthy of support, they are attempting to crawl back into the race by convincing the public that George W. Bush is somehow equally unworthy of our support.
Lacking any evidence to support their charges, they have clearly decided to invent some evidence of their own.
We are now 98% certain that the documents used by Dan Rather on 60 Minutes to launch a Kerry attack campaign against Bush and his Guard service are in fact, forgeries. We are 90% sure that the documents were delivered to CBS by someone in the Kerry camp, an allegation CBS has refused to deny.
60 Minute’s is an appropriate name for the show, because that’s how long it took to prove the story was bogus. Only Dan Rather, one crackpot from Texas who had two nervous breakdowns and a failed law suit against the government, and the DNC are standing behind the story.
Everyone else who has looked at the documents ruled them forgeries.
This is nothing new for the modern DNC, McAuliffe, Gore, Kerry, and many others have a long history of inventing campaign rhetoric aimed at tricking voters into blind Party loyalty at election time.
Media bias slanted heavily in favor of the DNC is not new either, especially from folks like Dan Rather and CBS.
What’s unprecedented is the lengths to which both the Democratic Party and the media are willing to go to unseat this particular President.
Putting a negative (albeit inaccurate) spin on your opponent’s policies and results has long been an accepted campaign practice in American politics. Politicizing a war effort became acceptable during Vietnam, and it was made famous by the current challenger to the White House, at the expense of his fellow soldiers.
But this is a whole new level of low, never before seen in American politics. A Party so desperate for power that they will say and do absolutely anything they can dream up in order to acquire that power.
A media outlet so biased, that they intentionally overlook what is obviously fraudulent evidence, intentionally ignore all witnesses who can easily dispute the charges as Dan Rather did, and dig their heels in hoping to weather the firestorm their actions created, as CBS has, is unbelievable.
Even more unbelievable is the number of Kerry supporters who hate Bush so much, that they are willing to join in the hate filled degradation of 254 decorated Vets, countless former POW’s and their families for the sake of removing Bush from office.
They are willing, like their Party and their candidate, to politicize anything, malign anyone, and invent any evidence they can dream up, look the other way when confronted with facts, or the lack their of, all for what?
Bush, McCain, even Al Gore signed form 180 authorizing the government to release all available records, but not John Kerry, his 180 form remains unsigned, why?
Kerry says Bush didn’t complete his service to the Guard, but Bush has an honorable discharge from his service. Kerry on the other hand, did not acquire his honorable discharge from the Navy until March of 2001, almost 30 years after leaving the military, why?
Jim Rassmann’s 15 minutes with Kerry made Kerry a hero in his mind, fine. Why is his 15 minutes of knowledge more powerful than 254 Vets who ate, bunked, commanded and served beside Kerry for weeks or months?
Never mind all of that, ask yourself why Kerry is running from his 20 year senate record, instead of running on it? If you go research his senate record, you will find out why…
Ask yourself why Kerry would work so hard, including forging evidence to destroy his opponents service record, and yet, refuse to sign form 180 to authorize the release of his own records, (which likely include the reasons why it took him 30 years after leaving the Navy to negotiate an honorable discharge)?
Ask yourself why Dan Rather would allow himself to be used by the DNC in this fashion? Dan has been around too long to plead ignorance.
Ask yourself why 254 decorated Vets would make up lies 35 years later, and expose themselves and their families to the onslaught of attacks from the DNC? Why countless POW’s would come forward more than 30 years later, and make up stories about the effects of John Kerry’s grandstanding back home?
Why Officer Kerry would have testified before congress, but not reported anything to his superior command regarding the atrocities he allegedly had first hand knowledge of, even committed himself?
Why won’t Kerry sign a sworn affidavit disputing the Swift Vets, 60 of whom have signed sworn affidavits challenging Kerry?
Answer all of these questions, and you will have answered the question of why the DNC and the Kerry campaign have jumped into the sewer of political strategies. You will have also answered why CBS and Dan Rather have sold out their integrity, what little they ever had.
Clearly, some media outlets, and some American voters are so blinded by their hatred of Bush, so jaded by their socialist ideological agenda, that all of this is acceptable to them, winning being all that matters. But what about the rest of America?
The rest of America should be outraged at the entire DNC campaign process, from their selling out to socialists like George Soros who fund the DNC propaganda machines, to their willingness to forge documents as needed.
Everyone knew that 2004 was going to make the 2000 election look reasonable by comparison. Nobody knew exactly how ugly it was going to get, to what extremes the left would go in an attempt to unseat Bush.
This will be our nation’s first billion dollar election, and the DNC will spend 70% of that trying to destroy Bush’s character and record by any means they can dream up.
The Bush camp is not likely to drop to their level, so the American people will have to get it right on their own come November, and I think they will!
Hope isn’t on the way, it is already here.
The hope of America isn’t John Kerry and John Edwards, or any other politician. It’s the American people, who still know a fraud when they see one!
JB Williams Political Columnist www.JB-Williams.com JBW@JB-Williams.com
ping
Try "penchant". I stopped right there. Sorry.
Who is JB Williams? If this is a vanity post it should be stated in the title. He makes some good points though.
A blogger--here's his website---
http://www.therant.us/staff/bios/jb_williams.htm
By the time this is over, Rather might not have a "pension", either...
pen·chant ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pnchnt)
n.
A definite liking; a strong inclination. See Synonyms at predilection.
Otherwise good points.
But this is a whole new level of low, never before seen in American politics. A Party so desperate for power that they will say and do absolutely anything they can dream up in order to acquire that power.
Oh So Clinton-esque and a mirror image of how they operate and at the expense of the US and the Democratic Party, they continue to wield their political power.
C'mon Hank you never made a typo??
:)
I 'never' spell *public* right the first time.
See BS, hear BS, speak BS
The phrase is "no penchant for truth."
Already posted: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1214834/posts
Oh, chill out! Thanks to the internet we get to know every uninformed opinion of every illiterate halfwit out there!
T'weren't a typo. A typo is a misspelling. This was a problem of word choice. Rule of thumb: if you don't know the actual phrase, don't use it. For example, how often have you read "he would of" when the writer meant to say "he would have." Simply because we hear something one way does not mean that is the way it is written.
Of course you are right, but that doesn't mean the writer doesn't say it properly, or know what he meant to say.. All I can say, is that sometime in haste, the eye sees the word spelled properly, without reading the context of the sentence.
Not to quibble, but really, it's not fair for a poster to refer to him as a halfwit because of one word. Seems a little Dan Ratherish to me. Hehehe. For I can spell, therefore I am smarter and better than you.. Uh huh.. sorry.. fails the smell test.
Don't know about the half-wit thing. What I do know is that sloppy writing typically denotes sloppy thinking.
Okay Junior.. if you say so..
Didn't know that T'wernt was a word.. Nor was it a complete sentence, but then, LOL, who cares..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.