Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agent behind fake uranium documents worked for France (FRENCH TREACHERY UNMASKED)
The Sunday Telegraph ^ | September 19, 2004 | Bruce Johnston

Posted on 09/18/2004 5:24:14 PM PDT by MadIvan

The Italian businessman at the centre of a furious row between France and Italy over whose intelligence service was to blame for bogus documents suggesting Saddam Hussein was seeking to buy material for nuclear bombs has admitted that he was in the pay of France.

The man, identified by an Italian news agency as Rocco Martino, was the subject of a Telegraph article earlier this month in which he was referred to by his intelligence codename, "Giacomo".

His admission to investigating magistrates in Rome on Friday apparently confirms suggestions that - by commissioning "Giacomo" to procure and circulate documents - France was responsible for some of the information later used by Britain and the United States to promote the case for war with Iraq.

Italian diplomats have claimed that, by disseminating bogus documents stating that Iraq was trying to buy low-grade "yellowcake" uranium from Niger, France was trying to "set up" Britain and America in the hope that when the mistake was revealed it would undermine the case for war, which it wanted to prevent.

Italian judicial officials confirmed yesterday that Mr Martino had previously been sought for questioning by Rome. Investigating magistrates in the city have opened an inquiry into claims he made previously in the international press that Italy's secret services had been behind the dissemination of false documents, to bolster the US case for war.

According to Ansa, the Italian news agency, which said privately that it had obtained its information from "judicial and other sources", Mr Martino was questioned by an investigating magistrate, Franco Ionta, for two hours. Ansa said Mr Martino told the magistrate that Italy's military intelligence, Sismi, had no role in the procuring or dissemination of the Niger documents.

He was also said to have claimed that he had obtained the documents from an employee at the Niger embassy in Rome, before passing these to French intelligence, on whose payroll he had been since at least 2000.

However, he reportedly also added that he had believed that the documents in question were genuine, and to have never suspected that they had been forged. "Martino has clarified his position and offered to deliver to the magistrates the documents which confirm his declarations," his lawyer, Giuseppe Placidi, told Ansa.

It was not possible to contact Mr Martino through his lawyer yesterday. Contacted by The Telegraph, Mr Ionta politely declined to comment, but did not deny that the questioning had taken place. The Interior Ministry in Rome, which had also expressed keen interest in the Telegraph article, refused to comment on the matter.

Mr Martino is said by diplomats to have come forward of his own accord and contacted authorities in the Italian capital following the earlier article in the Telegraph. They said he had written a letter of resignation to the French DGSE intelligence service last week.

According to an Italian newspaper report yesterday, members of the Digos, Italy's anti-terrorist police, removed documents from Mr Martino's home in a northern suburb of Rome on Friday afternoon.

"After being exposed in the international press, French intelligence can hardly be amused or happy with him," one western diplomat said. "Martino may have thought the safest thing was to hand himself over to the Italians." Investigators in Rome suspect that Mr Martino was first engaged by the French secret services five years ago, when he was asked to investigate rumours of illicit trafficking in uranium from Niger. He is thought to have then been retained the following year to collect more information. It was then that he is suspected of having assembled a dossier containing both real and bogus documents from Niger, the latter apparently forged by a diplomat.

In September 2002 Tony Blair accused Saddam of seeking "significant quantities" of uranium from an undisclosed African country - in fact, Niger. US President George W Bush made a similar claim in his State of the Union address to Congress four months later, using information supplied by MI6.

The International Atomic Energy Agency expressed doubts over some of the documents' authenticity, however, and declared them false in March 2003.

In July, the White House withdrew the president's claim, admitting that it was based on inaccurate information. British officials still say that their intelligence about Iraqi uranium purchases was supported by a second, independent source.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 16words; 200209; 200303; africa; dgse; digos; france; francelied; french; giacomo; italy; martino; niger; nigerflap; perfidy; roccomartino; saddam; sismi; telegraph; thepreslied; thepresslied; uktelegraph; uranium; uraniumgate; wilsonlied; wmd; wmdintelligence; yellowcake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: doug from upland
We didn't rely on the fakes. Our intel wasn't even just in document form. See my posts above- the intel we and the UK were working from preceded the 'discovery' of Giacomo's materials.

Some of our intel did come from the Italian Sismi- but it was't the intel later provided through Giacomo through the French.

21 posted on 09/18/2004 6:02:40 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Donate to Swift Boat Vets for the Truth HERE.
Sign Petition against CBS & Dan Rather HERE.
My Campaign Button Page
and My Toons Page [Updated 9-18 / 6:20PM CST]

22 posted on 09/18/2004 6:05:12 PM PDT by sonofatpatcher2 (Texas, Love & a .45-- What more could you want, campers? };^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

self-ping


23 posted on 09/18/2004 6:06:59 PM PDT by King Prout (civilization is a veneereal disease)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The French are lying, sneaking, conniving polecats.

Along with Dan Rather & The Democrats. (from Dave Barry: Sounds like a good name for a rock band!)
ps: You haven't been to Florida lately, have you?


24 posted on 09/18/2004 6:14:36 PM PDT by jrushing (Democrats=National Socialist Workers Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stonedog

Giancomo wasn't in Europe. He was working part time at a Kinko's in Texas. What scum. The French fake documents, the Democrats fake documents, the only difference is that the Dems have better technology. They use Microsoft 1972 and the French use a person. Of course, their deception lasted longer than two hours.
This has been all over the networks in the two weeks since you saw this in the Telegraph. Just like the oil for food scandal.


25 posted on 09/18/2004 6:16:31 PM PDT by IrishCatholic (No local communist or socialist party chapter? Join the Democrats, it's the same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

I'm confused, wasn't the British case based on info other than these forged memo's?

So was there really no deal between Saddam and Niger in buying low-grade uranium from them???
26 posted on 09/18/2004 6:20:47 PM PDT by WritableSpace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

I'm a bit out of touch. I don't have a television at the moment, as I'm on assignment in Arizona on the Navajo reservation. The location I'm at doesn't even have local tv service, lol.


27 posted on 09/18/2004 6:21:21 PM PDT by Stonedog (Mr. Blather... tear down this STONEWALL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan


28 posted on 09/18/2004 6:27:17 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

No, we didn't rely on the fakes. But the MSM and the Democrats sure as hell did for their propaganda campaign. It was a scorched earth campaign and extremely effective. Just about everyone in the country believed it.

We've seen a lot of orchestrated propaganda campaigns the last couple of years among the media and the Democrats. Interesting that the French seem to be involved as well. You can bet they worked with the DNC in setting this up and breaking the story.


29 posted on 09/18/2004 6:28:08 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
polecats?

You fixin to move to Texas Ivan? You're picking up on the lingo there pardner.

:-)

30 posted on 09/18/2004 6:29:45 PM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishCatholic

Ouch! That must hurt. The French managed forgeries that were better than the Dems. How ever will they live this down?

If the Dems cannot even surpass the French, they have no business applying to lead this country against the terrorists.


31 posted on 09/18/2004 6:38:34 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird
polecats?

Funny, I haven't heard that word since I was a kid. My Grandpa used to say "polecat, pussy(cat) with a fluid drive" when we'd pass a dead skunk in the middle of the road.
32 posted on 09/18/2004 6:39:05 PM PDT by jrushing (Democrats=National Socialist Workers Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Yes apparently there is a history of Niger supplying this type of uranium to various 'rogue states.'

Evidence of Niger uranium trade 'years before war': Embarrassment over fake documents obscured earlier intelligence that Iraq may have been trying to buy uranium
...three European intelligence services were aware of possible illicit trade in uranium from Niger between 1999 and 2001. Human intelligence gathered in Italy and Africa more than three years before the Iraq war had shown Niger officials referring to possible illicit uranium deals with at least five countries, including Iraq.

This intelligence provided clues about plans by Libya and Iran to develop their undeclared nuclear programmes. Niger officials were also discussing sales to North Korea and China of uranium ore or the "yellow cake" refined from it: the raw materials that can be progressively enriched to make nuclear bombs.

The raw intelligence on the negotiations included indications that Libya was investing in Niger's uranium industry to prop it up at a time when demand had fallen, and that sales to Iraq were just a part of the clandestine export plan. These secret exports would allow countries with undeclared nuclear programmes to build up uranium stockpiles...

33 posted on 09/18/2004 6:39:29 PM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan


The witch and her Marxist friends were behind this.
34 posted on 09/18/2004 6:43:18 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford; MadIvan; doug from upland

The joke of it all is that Iraq's trade mission to Niger was not a secret, so I don't know why Bush bothered to credit British intel for information that is essentially public.

In 1999 Iraq sent Ambassador Zahawie to Niger to hold conversations. Zahawie is famous for advocating the development of nuclear weapons by Arab states. Since Niger is not known for many exports aside from uranium, since Iraq has previously bought uranium from Niger, its not difficult to draw conclusions.

Wilson claimed at one point that Baghdad Bob also made a trip to Niger, and Nigerien officials also claimed that they had been contacted by Iraqi businessmen.

Wilson, and Niger, claimed though that neither Niger nor France would ever be involved in illicit sales of uranium.

But of course, since Libya has given up its nuclear program, we now know that they were buying their uranium from Niger, and hence, France.

Why would France be investigating uranium sales they themselves would be involved in? The idea that they would be plugging leaks makes sense. The fake documents were handed over to the US by France, and then exposed as fakes by a French member of the IAEA. This had the effect of discrediting a story that was not only true but public. And it very nearly brought down Bush at a time that he was preparing a war that France very much wished to derail.

It doesn't take a long memory to recall that France had maybe a hundred billion dollars on the line in Iraq's oil industry, and most of the high tech weaponry our guys came up against was French built and of recent vintage, some of it shipped immediately prior to the invasion.

France is not our friend.


35 posted on 09/18/2004 6:47:57 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marron

Well done.


36 posted on 09/18/2004 7:00:27 PM PDT by doug from upland (Dan Rather is a journalist like Michael Moore is a pole vaulter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: marron

Why isn't Kofi criticizing this complicity/coverup in nuclear proliferation and is instead ragging on Bush for removing Saddam? Oh, yeah...


37 posted on 09/18/2004 7:15:59 PM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Thanks for the ping!


38 posted on 09/18/2004 8:23:55 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
The French tradition of intelligence services creating fake documents for political purposes dates back at least to the Dreyfus affair. As for truth, they couldn't care less.
39 posted on 09/18/2004 9:22:54 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Grrr. I meant:

So, this appears to confirm that the intelligence Italy did provide earlier about Iraq and Niger was separate- as advertised - not related to these documents at all.

40 posted on 09/18/2004 9:52:41 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson