Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FNC: California law banning gay marriage is unconstitutional
Fox News | March 14, 2005

Posted on 03/14/2005 12:16:45 PM PST by Dont Mention the War

Breaking...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 1996; aba; adoption; amendment; behavior; children; dma; doma; father; federal; fma; gaymarriage; glsen; homosexualagenda; hrc; lamda; legal; marriage; mother; orgasm; pedophile; pflag; ruling; samesexmarriage; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-438 next last
To: Dont Mention the War

california is sooo wacked. its unconstitutional to prevent same sex marriage... but just try to light up a ciggerette on the beach... LOL!


21 posted on 03/14/2005 12:26:00 PM PST by beansox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
A judge ruled

Stunning that one judge can overrule the people of California.

22 posted on 03/14/2005 12:26:30 PM PST by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
judge ruled Monday that California can no longer justify limiting marriage to a man and a woman, a legal milestone that if upheld on appeal would pave the way for the nation's most populous state to follow Massachusetts in allowing same-sex couples to wed.

If the gender of the couple doesn't matter, should the number? What about polygamists?

23 posted on 03/14/2005 12:27:56 PM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
judge ruled Monday that California can no longer justify limiting marriage to a man and a woman, a legal milestone that if upheld on appeal would pave the way for the nation's most populous state to follow Massachusetts in allowing same-sex couples to wed.

If the gender of the couple doesn't matter, should the number? What about polygamists?

24 posted on 03/14/2005 12:28:11 PM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," Kramer wrote.




Also no rational reason why mother-daughter, father-son, brother-brother, sister-sister can't marry. In the case of mother-daughter or father-son, it would be quite practical for children taking care of elderly parents and needing the SS survivor benefits, and no inhertance tax.


25 posted on 03/14/2005 12:28:37 PM PST by Avenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hugin
No, it will go to the CA Supreme Court, which is surprisingly conservative.

Yes, the SCOCA is conservative, but it shouldn't be surprising. The SCOCA Justices are appointed by the Governer... and since 1967, a Republican has sat in the Governor's office for 26 of the 38 years (with only the 8 years of Governor Moonbeam Brown, and the 4+ years of Governor Gray-out Davis breaking the string.)

26 posted on 03/14/2005 12:29:00 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: beansox
Right!!!

The way we are going, there will be no need for the likes of the Michael Jackson trial. Under equal protection, if he likes young boys, well then he should be allowed to have them.

27 posted on 03/14/2005 12:29:26 PM PST by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

Another ruling from the very unfunny clowns at the ninth circus


28 posted on 03/14/2005 12:30:00 PM PST by tophat9000 (We didn’t rise they sunk look at the blue, water filled, sink holes map (Mike Moore Fatass divots ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Our government is run by the Constitution. The constitution is how the people tell the governmen how to run it and the parameters of the laws it can pass with the peoples will.

Prop 22 in Calif was a change to the Constitution, not a law to be ruled on my the courts, it is actually the opposite. We told the government how to operate and what laws they can pass.


29 posted on 03/14/2005 12:30:17 PM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

hell in a hand basket


30 posted on 03/14/2005 12:30:31 PM PST by 4everontheRight ( "I'm learning to dread one day at a time" --- Charlie Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15

state judge, not to the CA supreme court yet......


31 posted on 03/14/2005 12:30:34 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: So Cal Rocket

The state can and should ignore this judges ruling.

It is his 'opinion' and not an 'edict', that would force the state to abandon it's own laws.

Judge's, in these types of cases, have no force of imposition.


33 posted on 03/14/2005 12:31:19 PM PST by Bigh4u2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

How can something that is in the state constitution be ruled unconstitutional? Idiocy....


34 posted on 03/14/2005 12:31:51 PM PST by dmanLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer

Judge Kramer should have recuse himself. All Judges in SF are prohibited from supporting the Boy Scouts due to he scout's perceived intolerance and discrimination against gays. A major conflict of interest on his part.

35 posted on 03/14/2005 12:34:00 PM PST by Drango (All my ideas, good or bad, are stolen from other FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

One stinking leftist judge. One stinking ACLU'er.


36 posted on 03/14/2005 12:34:46 PM PST by KC_Conspirator (This space outsourced to India)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War

This will help to force the issue to the USSC or the states.


37 posted on 03/14/2005 12:34:58 PM PST by shellshocked (They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket

Kramer? When did he leave NYC and move to the left coast? I just knew there was something odd about that guy.


38 posted on 03/14/2005 12:34:58 PM PST by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: katieanna

San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer


39 posted on 03/14/2005 12:35:33 PM PST by Alouette (Learned Mother of Zion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-438 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson