Skip to comments.
FNC: California law banning gay marriage is unconstitutional
Fox News
| March 14, 2005
Posted on 03/14/2005 12:16:45 PM PST by Dont Mention the War
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-438 next last
To: Dont Mention the War
california is sooo wacked. its unconstitutional to prevent same sex marriage... but just try to light up a ciggerette on the beach... LOL!
21
posted on
03/14/2005 12:26:00 PM PST
by
beansox
To: So Cal Rocket
A judge ruled Stunning that one judge can overrule the people of California.
To: So Cal Rocket
judge ruled Monday that California can no longer justify limiting marriage to a man and a woman, a legal milestone that if upheld on appeal would pave the way for the nation's most populous state to follow Massachusetts in allowing same-sex couples to wed. If the gender of the couple doesn't matter, should the number? What about polygamists?
To: So Cal Rocket
judge ruled Monday that California can no longer justify limiting marriage to a man and a woman, a legal milestone that if upheld on appeal would pave the way for the nation's most populous state to follow Massachusetts in allowing same-sex couples to wed. If the gender of the couple doesn't matter, should the number? What about polygamists?
To: So Cal Rocket
"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," Kramer wrote.
Also no rational reason why mother-daughter, father-son, brother-brother, sister-sister can't marry. In the case of mother-daughter or father-son, it would be quite practical for children taking care of elderly parents and needing the SS survivor benefits, and no inhertance tax.
25
posted on
03/14/2005 12:28:37 PM PST
by
Avenger
To: Hugin
No, it will go to the CA Supreme Court, which is surprisingly conservative. Yes, the SCOCA is conservative, but it shouldn't be surprising. The SCOCA Justices are appointed by the Governer... and since 1967, a Republican has sat in the Governor's office for 26 of the 38 years (with only the 8 years of Governor Moonbeam Brown, and the 4+ years of Governor Gray-out Davis breaking the string.)
26
posted on
03/14/2005 12:29:00 PM PST
by
So Cal Rocket
(Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
To: beansox
Right!!!
The way we are going, there will be no need for the likes of the Michael Jackson trial. Under equal protection, if he likes young boys, well then he should be allowed to have them.
27
posted on
03/14/2005 12:29:26 PM PST
by
w1andsodidwe
(Jimmy Carter allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
To: Dont Mention the War
Another ruling from the very unfunny clowns at the ninth circus
28
posted on
03/14/2005 12:30:00 PM PST
by
tophat9000
(We didn’t rise they sunk look at the blue, water filled, sink holes map (Mike Moore Fatass divots ?)
To: So Cal Rocket
Our government is run by the Constitution. The constitution is how the people tell the governmen how to run it and the parameters of the laws it can pass with the peoples will.
Prop 22 in Calif was a change to the Constitution, not a law to be ruled on my the courts, it is actually the opposite. We told the government how to operate and what laws they can pass.
29
posted on
03/14/2005 12:30:17 PM PST
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Dont Mention the War
30
posted on
03/14/2005 12:30:31 PM PST
by
4everontheRight
( "I'm learning to dread one day at a time" --- Charlie Brown)
To: pierrem15
state judge, not to the CA supreme court yet......
31
posted on
03/14/2005 12:30:34 PM PST
by
tioga
Comment #32 Removed by Moderator
To: So Cal Rocket
The state can and should ignore this judges ruling.
It is his 'opinion' and not an 'edict', that would force the state to abandon it's own laws.
Judge's, in these types of cases, have no force of imposition.
33
posted on
03/14/2005 12:31:19 PM PST
by
Bigh4u2
To: Dont Mention the War
How can something that is in the state constitution be ruled unconstitutional? Idiocy....
34
posted on
03/14/2005 12:31:51 PM PST
by
dmanLA
To: So Cal Rocket
San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer Judge Kramer should have recuse himself. All Judges in SF are prohibited from supporting the Boy Scouts due to he scout's perceived intolerance and discrimination against gays. A major conflict of interest on his part.
35
posted on
03/14/2005 12:34:00 PM PST
by
Drango
(All my ideas, good or bad, are stolen from other FReepers)
To: So Cal Rocket
One stinking leftist judge. One stinking ACLU'er.
36
posted on
03/14/2005 12:34:46 PM PST
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: Dont Mention the War
This will help to force the issue to the USSC or the states.
37
posted on
03/14/2005 12:34:58 PM PST
by
shellshocked
(They're undocumented Border Patrol agents, not vigilantes.)
To: So Cal Rocket
Kramer? When did he leave NYC and move to the left coast? I just knew there was something odd about that guy.
38
posted on
03/14/2005 12:34:58 PM PST
by
fella
To: katieanna
San Francisco County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer
39
posted on
03/14/2005 12:35:33 PM PST
by
Alouette
(Learned Mother of Zion)
Comment #40 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 421-438 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson