Skip to comments.
I was wrong; so please join me in supporting Harriet Miers.
Posted on 10/09/2005 3:28:25 PM PDT by Pukin Dog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,141-1,146 next last
To: Torie
I agree with you.
41
posted on
10/09/2005 3:43:14 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
My insiders tell me, Harriet Miers is a homo-luvin baby-killin spawn of Satan. Maybe your insiders and mine ought together and hash it ought.
Bottom line is I trust Bush more than anyone with super secret inside information posting on a web forum, and that ain't saying much. Nice try though.
To: Pukin Dog
You have confirmed what I has read elsewhere in the blogsphere; that the other candidates who would otherwise have not been filibustered had things in their background that would have made them unconfirmable.
And by extension one might speculate that they might also have been forced from the bench altogether.
43
posted on
10/09/2005 3:43:49 PM PDT
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: Pukin Dog
Interesting rant. I'm still waiting for this Repulican Senate to get a collective spine and stop acting like the minority party. I still am opposed to the Miers nomination.
Viva la Reagan revolution. I want him back, he had balls.
To: Pukin Dog
No complaints from me for your reasonable decision to reconsider for the better good, and thanks for doing so.
This conservative infighting over Miers is wearing thin and only emboldens the rats.
45
posted on
10/09/2005 3:44:10 PM PDT
by
Ursus arctos horribilis
("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
To: Pukin Dog
Wow interesting followup's (personal attacks).....I do not know what is going on with that, however you made some valid points.....The more people speak out against her the more I am in favor of her....I agree with you regarding the weak republican senate..
46
posted on
10/09/2005 3:44:16 PM PDT
by
Kimmers
To: kidd
You are assuming that Brown and Owens would have agreed to undertaking the process again.
47
posted on
10/09/2005 3:44:33 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: bmwcyle
48
posted on
10/09/2005 3:45:06 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(I love Cyborg!)
To: Pukin Dog
I have tried in vain to make your exact point about how the Senate betrayed us, not Bush, which of course means we betrayed ourselves by electing gutless, spineless, cowards.
If the Senate will not back Bush, it is our fault
49
posted on
10/09/2005 3:45:10 PM PDT
by
JZoback
("There's a pony in here somewhere")
To: Pukin Dog
To: flashbunny
This is technically a de-opus. If he leaves again, that would be a re-opus. Alternately leaving and returning is a rope-a-dopus.
To: Pukin Dog
Dog, this has been in the back of my mind ever since Pres. Bush said Meiers "was the best person I could find." I was willing to bet that many or all of the people we would have wanted (JRB, Luttig, etc.) had their reasons for not wanting to go thru the hell that the confirmation process has turned into.
52
posted on
10/09/2005 3:45:32 PM PDT
by
Mygirlsmom
(This MESS is a PLACE!)
To: Petronski
The Miers thing is just so interesting in so many ways, on so many levels. It will make a good book some day, one of those tales that is more arresting that a novel. The players are interesting, the maneuvering is interesting, the suspense is interesting, the chess game is interesting.
53
posted on
10/09/2005 3:45:44 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: Petronski
54
posted on
10/09/2005 3:45:44 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(We broke Pink's Code and found a terrorist message)
Comment #55 Removed by Moderator
To: Kimmers
Hey, I probably earned the attacks. I just wish this issue had less to do with me. I will be more careful in the future.
56
posted on
10/09/2005 3:46:22 PM PDT
by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: Pukin Dog
Brown wouldn't. I've seen nothing that says Owens has been intimidated.
57
posted on
10/09/2005 3:46:48 PM PDT
by
kidd
To: Clara Lou; Pukin Dog
Otherwise, you're just another RINO.If Pukin Dog is a RINO....I'm an armadillo.
58
posted on
10/09/2005 3:47:03 PM PDT
by
Osage Orange
(I'm caring less, more and more....................)
To: Pukin Dog
I'm with you PD, this verifies my own private suspicions.
The republican senate is chock full of spineless wimps!
59
posted on
10/09/2005 3:47:08 PM PDT
by
Randy Larsen
(Freedom is not America's gift to man, Freedom is GOD'S gift to mankind!....G.W.Bush)
To: Pukin Dog
No, I saw your vanity post announcing you're back after not really leaving. In news/activism, no less.
Seriously. I've been on dozens of boards. If I didn't like they way they were, I just left. I didn't post an opus. And I sure as heck didn't post an opus and then come back. And I sure as sure as sure as huck didn't post more than one opus and come back more than once.
It just strikes me as someone who is starved for attention.
60
posted on
10/09/2005 3:47:22 PM PDT
by
flashbunny
(Sorry, but I'm allergic to KoolAid.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 1,141-1,146 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson