Posted on 10/26/2005 11:14:13 AM PDT by Cagey
Folks may not like to hear that, but Mrs. Bush is right. If I were an employer, and I had my choice of two prospects, I can guarantee you that, all other things being equal, the one without his or her face 'painted' would likely get the job, if that job had anything to do with relating to the public. If the job were one where the employer would only be working out of sight of my customers, it may not matter.
Not the exact same tatoo, but it was close, the skull was facing outward, and there was some other stuff on and around it.
Yes, I would like to apply for the childcare postion.
The pool is open now for Jesse Jackson's speech about Mrs Bush's racism.
I say tonight at 7:00.
Its fine, but some folks may not understand or get it, and think its a gang tatoo.
I've seen some of the jail tatoos, they are easily recognisable, and most of them are also repetitive.
One funny story involved a guy I know who is a tatoo artist and was doing tatoo work on a guy, the customer had erred in the spelling of someones name, so it came.....well, not to good.
lol.
Depends on the tattoos. If one says "Semper Fi" and the other "Kill a Commie for Mommie", I'll hire that guy, or gal.
Former members of one of the two big Green Gangs along with the three blue ones, will get the nod every time.
A guy? I'm not even sure if it's a Human!
Except in Toledo.
don't understand what's wrong in what she said...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.