Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fill 'er Up with Oils Sands!
TechCentralStation.com ^ | 10-31-05 | Michael Fumento

Posted on 10/31/2005 6:41:09 AM PST by EarthStomper

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2005 6:41:09 AM PST by EarthStomper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

Whats more interesting is that the left proposes static solutions [Kyoto, et al] instead of re-investing dollars into new tech.


2 posted on 10/31/2005 6:42:35 AM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper
It almost makes up for their inflicting William Shatner on us, eh?

We'll keep the Captain if they'll take Sulu.

3 posted on 10/31/2005 6:44:15 AM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

as the whale oil supply dwindled 'twas petroleum that saved the whales.


Funny, I thought it was Scotty and transparent aluminum that saved the whales.


4 posted on 10/31/2005 6:47:54 AM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fenris6

That's because, to be a leftist, you have to live in a private universe where you are the only purposeful agent. Other people are not real to you; they can't be expected to rise up and solve problems on their own.


5 posted on 10/31/2005 6:48:09 AM PST by thulldud (It's bad luck to be superstitious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

"In fact, oil cost about 50% more per barrel in 1979-80 than now when adjusted for inflation."

This is a completely bogus statement.

That fact is the more you make of something, the cheaper it should be for the unit price based on the nature of mass production yet, this is not occuring. The problem is that we are making more and charging more if not in the taxes but the burdens and, the profit demands made on the company by stockholders.


6 posted on 10/31/2005 6:51:58 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

Oil prices are so volatile that it takes a lot to convince a company that it will be worth it to go after a difficult oil source.


7 posted on 10/31/2005 6:53:34 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

Oil sands is NOT oil shale.


8 posted on 10/31/2005 6:53:54 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper
Frequently Asked Questions About the Oil Sands

Win-Win option...use the tailings to bring NO above sea level.

9 posted on 10/31/2005 6:55:35 AM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

Tried to buy any whale oil lately?
At any price?

As recently as the '70's it was an important anti-scuff additive for high-performance engines, but now - we HAVE in fact run out of it.

Economists, unfortunately, only think in terms of economic factors, but the world we live in is not so pure and simple.


10 posted on 10/31/2005 6:56:17 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper
"Suncor's success can be measured by stock prices that have increased an incredible 400% in the past five years..."

While Suncor's process may or may not be economically feasible without government subsidies, it is absolutely silly to measure their technical success by their stock price!
Just plain silliness!

11 posted on 10/31/2005 6:59:56 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper
It was a tenet of the late great economist Julian Simon that we'll never run out of any commodity. That's because before we do the increasing scarcity of that resource will drive up the price and force us to adopt alternatives.

Anyone who paid attention in introductory economics knows this. Back in the late 70s and early 80s I used to laugh when liberals and the press would say things like "The day is coming when it will be announced that all the oil is gone. There will be riots at the gas stations and cars stranded all over our cities...."

12 posted on 10/31/2005 7:02:13 AM PST by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil
z"That fact is the more you make of something, the cheaper it should be for the unit price based on the nature of mass production yet, this is not occuring."

Sure it is.

You're making one rather glaring omission:
At the same time production of petroleum has increased, consumption has increased enormously due to the rising purchasing power of India, China, and others.

There's another economic principle having to do with supply vs demand at work here.

13 posted on 10/31/2005 7:03:23 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

bttt


14 posted on 10/31/2005 7:04:08 AM PST by Tax-chick (I'm not being paid enough to worry about all this stuff ... so I don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EarthStomper

We will never run out of "oil". There is enough recoverable oil in shale and oil sand to last for hundreds of years.


15 posted on 10/31/2005 7:04:26 AM PST by BadAndy (Unnecessarily harsh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Oil sands are not oil shale, and this alone destroys the author's credibility.


16 posted on 10/31/2005 7:05:24 AM PST by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
"Oil sands is NOT oil shale."

Excellent point.

Most readily available crude oil is found in oil sands - it doesn't sit in neat little ponds underground.

Kinda makes you wonder about the accuracy of the rest of the article, doesn't it, when the author makes such a fundamental mistake?

17 posted on 10/31/2005 7:05:28 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

True but all those location have their own oil in the region. The largest oil reserve known is off the coast of russia and china - the largest oil company in the world is Russian.

There is plenty of oil so supply is not limited - production is only limited by government so the price climbs due to government restrictions not, market forces.


18 posted on 10/31/2005 7:08:05 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Actually, Suncor's stocked dropped $10/share a few weeks ago.


19 posted on 10/31/2005 7:09:39 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
With the new (forget the old from a few decades ago) proven technology, oil shale is in the ascendancy as a viable source of energy.
20 posted on 10/31/2005 7:14:41 AM PST by Ursus arctos horribilis ("It is better to die on your feet than to live on your knees!" Emiliano Zapata 1879-1919)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson