Skip to comments.
Clinton administration quashed fraud case against Cisneros (Barrett Report on Barry Finkelstein)
New York Daily News via Thomson Dialog NewsEdge ^
| January 17, 2005
Posted on 01/17/2006 8:41:01 PM PST by HAL9000
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
1
posted on
01/17/2006 8:41:03 PM PST
by
HAL9000
To: HAL9000
I thought they had successfully buried this.
2
posted on
01/17/2006 8:43:02 PM PST
by
secret garden
(Dubiety reigns here)
To: HAL9000
New York Times planning non-stop coverage. Developing . . . . . . .
3
posted on
01/17/2006 8:43:48 PM PST
by
neodad
(Rule Number 1: Be Armed)
To: HAL9000
So, can we impeach Clinton again?
4
posted on
01/17/2006 8:44:19 PM PST
by
Zeppo
To: HAL9000
Henry Cisneros is an idiot. He should be locked up and the key thrown away.
5
posted on
01/17/2006 8:45:00 PM PST
by
Fiddlstix
(Tagline Repair Service. Let us fix those broken Taglines. Inquire within(Presented by TagLines R US))
To: HAL9000
So? What makes you think anything Bill Clinton did is punishable?
6
posted on
01/17/2006 8:45:55 PM PST
by
nickcarraway
(I'm Only Alive, Because a Judge Hasn't Ruled I Should Die...)
To: HAL9000
Interesting. No one was more pro-clinton than the Daily News. But this is the second negative piece I've seen in the last few days. (The earlier one was hillary's comical maneuvers to avoid getting near Harry Belafonte for a photo op.)
7
posted on
01/17/2006 8:47:56 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: secret garden
8
posted on
01/17/2006 8:48:16 PM PST
by
satchmodog9
(Most people stand on the tracks and never even hear the train coming)
To: neodad
What kind of non stop coverage? Typical Clintonian where the attack is on the Special Prosecutor and defend the Clintons and their supporters?
9
posted on
01/17/2006 8:48:59 PM PST
by
airedale
( XZ)
To: HAL9000
Another CLINTON SCANDAL!
Add it to the list.
10
posted on
01/17/2006 8:49:14 PM PST
by
Rocky
(Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
To: HAL9000
A more complete article posted earlier by Emmett Tyrrell and Brian McGuire at the NY Sun -
Cisneros Probe Stirred Worries Of Democrats. In hindsight, that would have been the better article for Breaking News category.
11
posted on
01/17/2006 8:51:09 PM PST
by
HAL9000
(Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
To: Txsleuth; varmintxer; Bahbah; TEXOKIE; rodguy911; MNJohnnie; saveliberty; AliVeritas; Tony Snow; ...
12
posted on
01/17/2006 8:52:51 PM PST
by
eeevil conservative
(courage is living in tyranny and speaking for freedom/not living in freedom and speaking for tyranny)
To: HAL9000
Due to various horse trading among Republicans and Democrats on the Hill, 1000 pages of this report were ordered redacted by the Congress. Appears that dumbocrats successfully sheilded Clinton from some very damaging information in return for whatever the pubblies got for going along.
This is the biggest part of this story. Does'nt matter which party is in charge, our elected reps cover their own arses in order to keep their jobs at the cost of truth, liberty and the American way. None of them are worth a darn after about 4 years in D.C.
13
posted on
01/17/2006 8:53:03 PM PST
by
Thickman
(Voter fraud in this country must be addressed by the Congress!)
To: nickcarraway
This isn't so much about Bill as it is about She Who Shall Not Be Named. The article also talks about her close friend Peggy Richardson (more like a Maggie than a Peggy), who was the IRS Commissioner at the time. It says she was also involved in trying to quash the investigation.
(All of a sudden, it seems I'm favorable toward leaks to newpapers. LOL.)
14
posted on
01/17/2006 8:54:36 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: HAL9000
If there is evidence of obstruction of justice, then people need to go to jail. It was good enough to indict Libby, and it was good enough to send Martha Stewart to jail. We shall see who does or does not get prosecuted.
15
posted on
01/17/2006 8:56:35 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
To: Thickman
I am in total agreement...and I am SO ANGRY that they have let this be covered up as much as they have...
After Hillary's rhetoric of late, also....they should see it as a DUTY to let this country know what else the Clintons were hiding while in the White House...
As far as I am concerned....if they don't do something to get the information about the Clintons out...then they are complicit in any damage that comes to this country should Hillary EVER spend one more night in the White House.
16
posted on
01/17/2006 8:57:06 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
To: savedbygrace
Wouldn't it be nice to see Hillary die a death of a thousand knives while bits and pieces leak out?
17
posted on
01/17/2006 8:57:45 PM PST
by
Thickman
(The only answer is TERM LIMITS!)
To: HAL9000
Didn't ALGORE just say something about administrations breaking the law? I wonder if this is another no controlling legal authority case.
To: savedbygrace
Yes...but, it is VERY troubling that Barrett "was talked into" dropping all of the evidence against "Maggie" Richardson...
19
posted on
01/17/2006 8:58:20 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
To: Thickman
What a wonderful visual.....
20
posted on
01/17/2006 8:59:22 PM PST
by
Txsleuth
(Thank you to all that donated on the Freepathon...next time more monthlies!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson