Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP is in 'deep funk' over Bush spending
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 3/12/6 | Carolyn Lochhead

Posted on 03/12/2006 7:51:39 AM PST by SmithL

Washington -- The Republican rebellion that President Bush smacked into with the Dubai ports deal was the tip of an iceberg of Republican discontent that is much deeper and more dangerous to the White House than a talk radio tempest over Arabs running U.S. ports.

A Republican pushback on Capitol Hill and smoldering conservative dissatisfaction have already killed not just the ports deal but key elements of Bush's domestic agenda, and threaten GOP control of Congress if unhappy conservatives sit out the November midterm elections.

The apostasy in some quarters runs to heretofore unthinkable depths.

"If I had a choice and Bush were running today against (Democratic President) Bill Clinton, I'd vote for Bill Clinton," said Bruce Bartlett, a former Reagan administration Treasury Department official whose book, "Impostor: How George Bush Bankrupted America and Betrayed the Reagan Legacy," is making the rounds of conservative think tanks and talk shows. "He was clearly a much better president in a great many ways that matter to me."

Bartlett may lie at the extreme, but his critique taps into a strong undertow -- reflected in a sharp drop in Bush's support among his typically solid Republican base, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll released Friday.

"Bush's compassionate conservatism has morphed into big government conservatism, and that isn't what the base is looking for," said David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union. "The White House and the congressional leadership have got to reinvigorate the Republican base. In off-year elections ... if your base isn't energized, particularly in a relatively evenly divided electorate, you've got more problems than you think you have."

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; conservatives; dubya100pctright; dubyacandonowrong; dubyaisneverwrong; federalspending; gop; presbushisperfect; republicans; republicansellout; republicanvalues; wemustnotopposebush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-286 next last
To: RFEngineer
YOU guys keep bashing the only hope that we have, and we are going to see floundering of Biblical Proportions (when the dims win in '06/'08. Bank on it!

dims win and...
1) Bush will be Impeached
2) Higher Taxes, linked to massive NEW domestic spending
3) Pull troops out of Iraq, then Afghanistan (Fortress Amerika)
4) Hillarycare
5) 2nd Amendment redefined (see #5 below)
6) Liberal judges placed on Conservative district benches
7) Return of the "Great Society"
8) Socialism, Isolationism, Defeatism
9) Gay marriage will be Federally approved
10) Unionized/Nationalized industries such as ports, air travel... WalMart will be attacked until defeat is certain. Increased government interference in Small Business.
11) Mandated hybrid autos, coupled with unreal CAFE standards, Windfall Profits tax on fossil fuel, massive subsidy to ethanol etc. Gas will be at record highs.
12) History shows by this time we will be facing and "Old Time World War). History is our friend.

LLS
41 posted on 03/12/2006 8:33:08 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
"I did chuckle. "

Never is a long long time :)

I would vote for a Libertarian president in a heartbeat if I thought there was a chance in hell they would win or if the other options were equally bad or benign.

The LP is really bad at getting their message to the masses. I love the work put out by the Cato Institute, but your average Joe is not going to stop and read it much less get it. They are shooting way too high.
42 posted on 03/12/2006 8:33:30 AM PST by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Anybody But Hiltlery

mc


43 posted on 03/12/2006 8:34:07 AM PST by mcshot (Rusty but trusty or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Some conservatives actually want the things you mention to happen...


44 posted on 03/12/2006 8:34:21 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
People had better understand that when a lib mentions too much "spending", they MEAN TAXES ARE NOT HIGH ENOUGH!

Exactly.

45 posted on 03/12/2006 8:35:04 AM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

So the Congress passes the bills and it's Bush's fault for not vetoing them?


46 posted on 03/12/2006 8:35:07 AM PST by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kjo
Vote Libertarian. They are the only sane choice. If the GOP runs McCain and the Dems run Hitlery conservatives lose. So "throw" your vote away on what you want anyway, sane government.

There's always a chance that McCain appoints social conservative judges. Will Hillary ever do that? I don't think so.

47 posted on 03/12/2006 8:35:25 AM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ndt

the LP party isnt serious because so many of their memebers are memebers for one reason and one reason only..legal narcotics


48 posted on 03/12/2006 8:35:52 AM PST by georgia2006
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
All President Bush did is sign the bill that comes to his desk.

All President Bush did is sign every single bill that comes to his desk.

Just one veto on any appropriation bill would show he is serious. I think Clinton stole the veto pen along with the W keys when he left.

49 posted on 03/12/2006 8:35:52 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The tree of liberty is getting awfully parched.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; ConsentofGoverned; raybbr; kjo; EagleUSA; madeinchina; Moonman62
Note to moron columnists, rabid Freeper Bush haters, fringe party wack jobs and other bigoted Know Nothings, CONGRESS spends the money. Do you have any clue how stupid you all sound whining about "no Vetos" on bills that passed with MORE THEN ENOUGH VOTES TO OVERRIDE A VETO? Did you EVER bother to think a Veto is NO guarantee Congress will not simply come back with a WORSE bill? No, of course not. Would not do to let any reality into your politically bigoted, ignorant little worlds. Just scream "White House Spin" and "Drinking the Republican Koolaid" rather then actual LEARN something for once. Would NOT do for the Whine All The Time Choir to actually THINK for once.

Congress have sent every Bush Budget back as much as 1/3 HIGHER then it went up to the Hill. Can we AT LEAST have the guts to put the blame WHERE it belongs for a change? But of course not since Mike Savage did not tell you this fact it doesn't exist in your sad little bubble world of ignorance.

50 posted on 03/12/2006 8:36:05 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Are you not entertained? Are you NOT entertained? Is this not what you came here for?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wasanother
They've all been pirates with taxpayers money but I get tired of congress getting a free pass.

Last I heard their approval rating was lower than GWB's. The quarterback always gets more of the credit or blame.

If they cut discretionary spending in half, the deficit goes away in two years even with paying for some wars but instead they brag on cutting it 5%.

Is that a real 5%, or is it a 5% decrease in the projected increase? You know how it goes.

51 posted on 03/12/2006 8:36:23 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
and this public, Republican mea culpa is coming at precisely the wrong time. They behaved pathetically this weekend in Memphis.

Amen.

And they cannot win by running away from Bush.

52 posted on 03/12/2006 8:36:30 AM PST by Howlin ("Quick, he's bleeding! Is there a <strike>doctor</strike> reporter in the house?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006

Some people that think they are Conservative. Just reading that list should cause true Conservatives to break out in a RASH! :-)

LLS


53 posted on 03/12/2006 8:37:37 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006

Bruce Barlett is clearly a jackass. Bush has reduced taxes, and spurred on an economy through an economic downturn (that began before he was in DC) and several nation crisis that could sink an economy. I'd like to hear what this numbskull thinks that Bill Clinton did for the economy or to reduce spending.


54 posted on 03/12/2006 8:37:37 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; A. Pole

Time to wise up. A Big Spending, Big Taxing, Globalist Federal Government is what we'll always have. You're only choice is a modicum of difference vis-a-vis social issues that have little real impact on your life, but great visceral appeal based on emotions. It's by design, and keeps us all from being a real threat to the Powers That Be.


55 posted on 03/12/2006 8:39:11 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper
Congress is the one with the spending problem

Both branches of government are culpable. Remember how the Bush administration unlawfully held over the CAFTA vote til they got a majority? How they went to congressmen that had voted no, and by promising them pork barrel projects for their districts, got some to change their votes? Bush and Clinton both have refined the art of giving way federal tax money to achieve their political aims. That is not an honorable way to run a government, IMO and one reason we have such a spending problem.

The other part is the amount of federal money going out as subsidies to transnational corporations to create 'business environments' in targeted third world countries. They call it "trade capacity development" and it is costing the taxpayer BIG TIME, and costing our domestic economy its health.
56 posted on 03/12/2006 8:39:25 AM PST by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Congress have sent every Bush Budget back as much as 1/3 HIGHER then it went up to the Hill. Can we AT LEAST have the guts to put the blame WHERE it belongs for a change?

A famous president once said the buck stops on GWB's desk. It does. He set the tone for this spendfest.

57 posted on 03/12/2006 8:39:39 AM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: kjo
Vote Libertarian. They are the only sane choice.

HAHAHAHAHA.

58 posted on 03/12/2006 8:39:43 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: georgia2006; LibLieSlayer
Some conservatives actually want the things you mention to happen...

Sadly, that's true. I wonder why.

59 posted on 03/12/2006 8:39:56 AM PST by paudio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ketelone

You are kidding right??????????


60 posted on 03/12/2006 8:40:58 AM PST by chris1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-286 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson