Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are California, Nevada and Arizona really THEIR land...
KCET Ch 28 Program "The US Mexican War" ^ | Robert W. Johannsen

Posted on 05/02/2006 3:48:34 PM PDT by persephone35

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: AnotherUnixGeek
...it's the Native Americans who lived in what is now the western US.

...and they still do. I vacationed in Northern AZ last year and it sure was apparent that the Native Americans pretty much ran the show.

No problem with that, other than the inability to have a beer for three days.

21 posted on 05/02/2006 4:15:14 PM PDT by Recovering Hermit (A hermit is a deserter from the army of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: calex59

Thank you for expounding the historical facts. Any authors you recommend on this topic?


22 posted on 05/02/2006 4:15:27 PM PDT by Draco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: persephone35
Some critics predicted that the "impenetrable mountains and dry narrow valleys" of California and the "trackless, treeless…and utterly uninhabitable" New Mexico — would prove useless, threatening the nation's frontier settlements and draining the national treasury. Some believed that Mexico rid itself of worthless land and received $15 million from the U.S. for the sacrifice.

This is fascinating but not very useful to refute the argument of the illiterate invaders among us. More useful would be research into what the newspapers and government of Mexico were saying at the time, both privately and publicly.

I won't hold my breath, since I suspect that the only existing legitimate government in Mexico which could legitimize the final settlement of the war were laughing all the way to the bank...

Analyzing an event 150 years old by today's Political Correctness is naive at best, fraudulent at worst.

So... no, it's not really their land.
They can only understand force; the force of numbers, in their case. I would caution them to not push it.

23 posted on 05/02/2006 4:16:25 PM PDT by Publius6961 (Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VOATNOW1

So was it annexed after winning a war, or was it bought?.


24 posted on 05/02/2006 4:17:53 PM PDT by angelanddevil2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AFreeBird

If we gave it back , we would see Tijuana-like enclaves replacing all the major southwest cities. AND we would have to deal with "immigrants " sneaking into Des Moines


25 posted on 05/02/2006 4:18:18 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Michael Goldsberry

"Si usted desea leer este mensaje en inglés, aprieta uno."

Let me get this straight: Leerin' at who?


26 posted on 05/02/2006 4:18:52 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Draco

One author that is probably not an historical author is Larry McMurtry, not only will you have fun reading him you will gain a little insight into the real history of the west. Other authors that are historical slip my mind right now but will look them up and get back to you!


27 posted on 05/02/2006 4:20:29 PM PDT by calex59 (No country can survive multiculturalism. Dual cultures don't mix, history has taught us that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
we would see Tijuana-like enclaves replacing all the major southwest cities. AND we would have to deal with "immigrants " sneaking into Des Moines

Yea, that's a drawback.. and what the hell do we do with the socialist Americans immigrating from Mexifornia? We surely don't need them to pollute the Interior red states.

Yep, the only course is to drive the invaders out.

28 posted on 05/02/2006 4:20:50 PM PDT by AFreeBird (your mileage may vary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0
The Incas were in Peru.

The Azrecs did severely oppress their neighbors, especially the Toltecs and Texcocos, against whom they waged wars for the taking of captives by the tens of thousands to be sacrificed to Huitzilopoctli and other demon gods.

In fact, that's how Hernando Cortes defeated the Aztec Empire: with the enthusiastic cooperation of the Toltecs and Texcocos.

29 posted on 05/02/2006 4:21:39 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Nade te turbe, nada te espante: todo se pasa, Dios no se muda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: persephone35
And they say that this is their land? Obviously they don't know very much about anything the history of their country.

There, fixed.

30 posted on 05/02/2006 4:23:10 PM PDT by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: persephone35

If you get out a map and look even half heartedly, you will see that most of Arizona is soverign Indian land.

Extremely large sections of Arizona will hve to be taken from the Indians if they want to Mexicanize it.


The solution is to invade and recapture all of Mexico. Winfield Scott and Robert E Lee did it once in the 1840's and we should send Tommy Franks to do it again.

We can then sort it all out with Mexico as a territory.


31 posted on 05/02/2006 4:25:45 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Names Ash Housewares


32 posted on 05/02/2006 4:26:08 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: angelanddevil2

"So was it annexed after winning a war, or was it bought?"

Quein sabe?

Oh wait, that's Tonto's line.

Well, it sure wasn't "Kemo sabe". Our Indians spoke better Spanish than that.

Answer to question: We won it in a war, and we then paid for it. It's ours.

I think right now we need to find a few politicians with enough gonads to say that directly to Fox.


33 posted on 05/02/2006 4:26:24 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus
The first Mexican-American war showed that you cannot keep land you cannot defend.

Considering there were only 4000 Mexicans living in ALL of California at the time, defense was not much of an option.

34 posted on 05/02/2006 4:26:53 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Hermit
No problem with that, other than the inability to have a beer for three days.

The natives from the Shoshone-Bannock reservation can't have alcohol on the reservation, so they come into Pocatello and Chubbuck to get drunk. Nothing like a whoopin', hollerin', spittin' nasty native in the back seat of a squad car. They put spit hoods on them because they are given to spitting on police officers...drunk or not. The natives tend to forget that they need a valid driver's license when driving off the reservation. Cars have to be registered and insured too. You don't want to be on Yellowstone avenue between the bars and the reservation at closing time. You're likely to be run down by a drunk native speeding to the reservation with the headlights off. Lots of fun.

35 posted on 05/02/2006 4:28:17 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Semper Paratus

Actually you are wrong. We invaded and captured all of Mexico and allowed it to return to Mexican soverignty minus the states under discussion.

They have a precedent of keeping land they can't defend. President James K Polk set it.


36 posted on 05/02/2006 4:28:18 PM PDT by bert (K.E. N.P. Slay Pinch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
Leerin' at who?

Читать

*Snicker*

37 posted on 05/02/2006 4:28:20 PM PDT by Michael Goldsberry (Lt. Bruce C. Fryar USN 01-02-70 Laos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
If we gave it back , we would see Tijuana-like enclaves replacing all the major southwest cities. AND we would have to deal with "immigrants " sneaking into Des Moines

Too late. Happening yesterday, today and tomorrow too.

38 posted on 05/02/2006 4:30:13 PM PDT by Stormcrow ("It's not that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: angelanddevil2
So was it annexed after winning a war, or was it bought?.

The American army drove the Mexican army all the way to Mexico City. The Mexican government in exile negotiated the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo establishing the current boundaries of the United States southwest. We paid them $15 million compensation for damage to Mexican property. We didn't annex it. It was ceded in a legal, binding treaty with both governments.

39 posted on 05/02/2006 4:32:44 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
But then from the new "southwestern border" they will incur into Nevada, Wyoming, Colorado, Oregon.

Pathologists call this metastasizing.
40 posted on 05/02/2006 4:33:21 PM PDT by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson