Posted on 05/16/2006 2:52:45 PM PDT by Libloather
Rush Talks with Vice President Cheney
May 16, 2006
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: And once again, we are thrilled and honored to have with us the vice president of the United States, Dick Cheney. Mr. Vice President, welcome back. As always, great to have you here.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, good afternoon, Rush.
RUSH: All right, question: Is the president -- are you and the president, the administration -- aware of the dissatisfaction on the whole issue of illegal immigration that exists, not just within the Republican base but within the country at large?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Yes we are, Rush. In my travels out around the country I've found for a long time now immigration, illegal immigration in particular, to be a big issue, and it's true no matter part of the country you go to. Of course you find it down along the border of Texas, Arizona, New Mexico, but I also was out in the Seattle area the other day and talked to several folks out there, and it was a significant issue up there, too. It takes different forms in different places around the country but it's a tough issue. It's complicated; it's important, and so there are, I think, legitimate concerns out there on the part of a lot of folks.
RUSH: Why do you think so many people -- and I'm just judging from telephone calls I've had and when I make trips to California like you just mentioned, I can't get away from the subject. It's all anybody wants to talk about, particularly in southern California. Why is it that so many people don't think that the steps the president is outlining and has outlined over the years will address the seriousness of the problem?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, I think part of it is that a lot of folks aren't aware of what's already being done. I mean, the president pointed out in his speech for example that since we got into office, we have arrested, turned back, sent back across the border some six million illegals. That's huge number. There's a huge amount of effort that's gone into that. We've had a very significant increase in resources. It's just that the problem is so big, there's still a lot more to be done and to date we've not been successful in getting a comprehensive approach out of the Congress that would allow us to address some of these issues. So we've been doing what we could administratively; we've been doing what we could with appropriations bills but in terms the basic legislation we've still got a ways to go. The House has acted; the Senate has not yet acted, and then of course we'll have to get something out of conference, and what the president did last night was lay out a fairly precise program in terms of what he'd like to see.
RUSH: Well, let's talk about what's going on in the Senate. There are a number of bills there. The compromise bill we're being told is Hagel-Martinez, two Republicans proposing this bill. Robert Rector at Heritage and Senator Sessions, who I know you respect, both did joint analyses of this bill and what they project, using conservative estimates, is anywhere from over the next 20 years 110 to 217 million legal immigrants entering the country and illegals as part of that number being granted legal status. What is the public policy purpose for doing that in these kinds of numbers?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: I haven't seen their analysis, Rush, and at this point, of course, what you have in the House bill is specifically a border-enforcement bill. What you've got in the Senate bill is a bill that goes after border enforcement but also you've got Hagel-Martinez and there's Kennedy-McCain. There are a lot of proposals kicking around. The Senate has not finalized its package yet so we don't know what's going to come out of the conference. Obviously we're going to want to look at it very carefully to make sure it does achieve the objectives the president's talked about.
RUSH: Well, if you haven't seen it, let me give you the bare essentials. Senator Sessions did his own analysis. It's a 614 page bill. I know it's gotta be conferenced, but this is a pretty radical starting point. They have anywhere from 117 to 217 million legal Americans -- that's two-thirds of the population -- over the next 20 years if this bill were to become law and if the president signed it as is. Now, hopefully that --
THE VICE PRESIDENT: These are people who would attain legal status?
RUSH: No, this is a combination of both. This is an increase in the number of legal immigrants as well as added to illegals who would then be made legal over that 20-year time frame and it also allows for exponential growth because these people would be allowed to bring in their family members as well, and one of the big concerns here is the strain this would put on an already stretched social safety welfare net and this sort of thing --
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Mmm-hmm.
RUSH: -- and so these numbers are just striking to me. Add two-thirds of the country's population in 20 years? I don't think we can handle that financially and certainly not in an assimilation way.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Right. Well, if that's the case I would hope that would inform the debate and that Congress will consider those kinds of impacts very carefully before they finally pass something. We'll certainly weigh in on it.
RUSH: Well, Senator Sessions, I think in floor debate today, spent some time really working the numbers and he thinks most senators aren't even aware of these numbers and he's going to do his best to make them aware during the debate.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Yeah.
RUSH: So hopefully that's true. Now, let's talk about the National Guard. Six thousand Guardsmen. What's the length of time that it is expected they will be needed?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, the total proposal is to run for one year in terms of using the National Guard, and over that period of time we've added some 3,000 Border Patrol since we got here. We're going to increase that by an additional 6,000. That's a 50% increase in the Border Patrol over where we are today, and the National Guard would be, in effect, to supplement what's there already in terms of the Border Patrol during that period of time while you recruit and train additional Border Patrol officers. That is it's Guardsmen as a temporary measure. Units, it is expected, would go down as part of their regular training rotation, and this would be for up to 6,000 at any one time. The way they'd handle their annual training exercise, would go down in support of the Border Patrol themselves.
RUSH: Let me ask you this on behalf of my audience simply because of a number of e-mails. People don't think that this number of 6,000, which probably will add up to two or 3,000 on duty at any given time, is actually going to make much of an impact. What would you say to them?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well, I'd say it's not just about the National Guard. You've already got a large number of folks working down there under the auspices of the Border Patrol. We've got big investments going in now in terms of additional technology, in terms of sensors and aerial vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles and so forth, as well as fences. One of the very useful things the Guard can do is what they did there in San Diego a few years ago when they installed a section of fence there that's turned out to be very effective -- that particular section has been very effective -- basically was built by Guard troops. So there are a lot of things they could do to support the effort and to beef up the effort that's already underway and I think that's the intention with respect to the Guard. It's not a be-all and end-all of the operation. I think a lot of our folks who sign up for military service don't sign up to go stand on the border for two or three years of active duty. But this is a way to use the resources of the National Guard to support the professionals who are otherwise involved in that activity. We think it makes sense. It's been done before to some extent in the counter-narcotics area. It's not a new concept to have the Guard working the border in support of federal officials.
RUSH: As all of you in the administration discuss the issue and formulate a plan, do you ever, has a wall, an actual wall, ever been given serious consideration?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: It is given serious consideration, not a wall, for example, from ocean to ocean. There are a lot of places out there where it doesn't make sense. There are other places where it does. I'm told -- I'm not an expert in this by any means -- that when you get into built-up urban areas fences -- "security barriers" might be a better word for it -- are in fact an important part of the overall plan and need to be part of it. There are other areas where you've got vast spaces out there where you need other kinds of arrangements. You need roads to be able to patrol. You can use remote cameras; you can use unmanned aerial vehicles. It's partly a matter of getting technology into it as well, too. It's a very complicated problem. We're talking just about one piece of it, just the border security part of it. But you've also got to address, I think, some of the basic economic incentives that attract people in the first place: all those folks who want to come here for the jobs that they can find working in the United States for a lot more than they can make in Mexico or someplace in Central America. We think you've got to address all those aspects and facets of the problem, and where appropriate fences or security barriers make good sense, but I think the experts got to go through and figure out what's the best technique or procedure for each part of the border.
RUSH: Let me ask you a quick political question, two prongs to it. The Dubai Ports deal. The American people spoke out loudly against it: "We don't want any part of it." It got killed. The illegal immigration deal is generating just as much negative response, but the American people are not getting the reaction, the same reaction from government to that that they got on the Dubai Ports deal. A little confused, asking questions: What's different here? We're still talking security. The second thing is, Democrats, Mr. Vice President, frankly, are getting away with being total bystanders and spectators on this. They offer no solution themselves, yet they continue to sit around and criticize the administration and the Republicans over this. Is there a plan to deal with them politically on this?
THE VICE PRESIDENT: Well! (chuckles) It is a very tough issue. There's no question about it. You mentioned the Dubai Ports deal, Rush. That created a firestorm of controversy, and so Congress quickly backed provisions that would have made it impossible to go forward, and of course the folks at Dubai Ports withdrew their proposal. The fact is that, from the perspective of United Arab Emirates and so forth -- I worked closely with those folks. They have been very good allies of ours, and I don't want to go back and redo the whole Dubai Ports operation. But the fact of the matter is I thought there was a very strong emotional reaction there. I can understand the emotional reaction, but it didn't bear much resemblance to the basic fundamental facts. What we have here... I mean, I suppose there's a difference between trying to govern and solve a major problem which is what the president and those of us who work for him are trying to do, versus the Democrats, in this case, who don't have any responsibilities or at least aren't willing to take any responsibilities, willing to sit on the sidelines and take potshots. This is an important problem for us to deal with. We've got some 11 or 12 million illegals in the country. It is a national security problem. It's also an economic problem. If you could round all those folks up tomorrow and put them back over the border, you'd have a big hole in your workforce. It is not an easy, simple proposition. If it was, it would have been solved a long time ago. It's one of those tough, intractable problems where you're going to make progress three yards and a cloud of dust. We need to get started. We need to get the border secured. That's our top priority. But then we also need to deal with other aspects of the problem.
RUSH: Mr. Vice President, thanks for your time. I wish we had a little bit more but I know you're on a tight schedule and it's thrill whatever time we have with you, whenever. So thanks very much for being with us now, and we look forward to the next time.
THE VICE PRESIDENT: All right, it's good to talk to you, Rush. You render a great service out there by hosting these debates.
RUSH: Thank you, sir, very much.
Cheney is on record as wanting fences or walls
Cheney should have been President. We would be getting real results for America now, IMHO...
Wouldn't this be a tremendous waste of resources -- to put a fence where there is no possibility of coming over the border? There is one thing some people are forgetting -- once a government project gets going, nothing stops it. The fence will be there forever. It will become a bottomless barrel of pork that will never end. Let's fence the most vulnerable and porous parts of the border first, then fill in the gaps where it is really needed. It seems to me that the Administration's approach to the fence is the rational one.
Now to be fair, it was 210.
Money for welfare for able-bodies Americans, but not for the border patrol.
"Wouldn't it be cheaper to arrest illegals, and sentence them to 90 days hard labor building the fence before they get deported?"
I have a better idea. How about for every so many illegals caught coming in at the border; we sentence a corrupt official to hard labor building the fence?(sarcasm)
Heck, it beats sitting out there picking their noses since they won't have any power to actually secure the border.
Good satire.
Any opening will be utilized. Nothing will prevent them, even rough terrain, from coming through the opening. Likely with assistance from the Mexican Government.
Kinda scary that the administration doesn't seem to have done an analysis on what kind of numbers the various guest worker plans will bring into our country.
And to add to Soul Seeker's #11 - W said he was going to put "up to" 6000 NG. That, taken with the rest of his speech, could mean 2.
Good interview. One of the problems is that we are dealing with people (Dems) who are 100% behind illegal immigration that they think benefits them because it adds to their dead and illegal voter pool, and are being supported by a bunch of radical organizations (ANSWER, Code Pink) that organize demonstrations of barely literate and extremely excitable Mexicans, who are then faithfully adored by the Dem "mainstream media."
Most Hispanics would be very happy to be (a) guest workers who go back to their own dysfunctional country with a handful of dollars and open a grocery store in their village; or (b) people who want to learn English, adapt, stay and become rich someday.
There are two problems: one is the Democrat party, which does not want them to do either of the above; the other is Mexico, which also does not want either of the above. I know that, theoretically, we have to court Mexico because they are a border state and should be (but are not) our friend.
Mexico is about to elect a raving lefty, sponsored by Chavez, as its president, because Fox and his supposedly reformist party (PAN) have been so ineffective and in fact have been more anti-American than Salinas and his party (PRI). The problem nobody is addressing is Mexico.
He cares so much he is sending the National Guard to the border to watch illegals cross the border. They can't apprehend or come near the invaders. The National Guard is there to do the work that the illegal immigrants simply won't do. Do the day-to-day support work for the border guard.
Then you focus ICE personnel at the gaps. A lot easier than focusing on 1,200 miles of border. Some Freepers seem to favor an all or nothing approach.
As long as it doesn't get in the way--of the search and traverse machine gun firing.
The Krauthammer quote was true. I have stopped watching "Special Report" because all they do is insult conservatives during the panel discussion.
I have lost all respect for Charles after he said tens of millions of Americans who are for enforcement of laws "should have their medications adjusted". Then Bush always talks to us as if we are little children who are throwing a baby tantrum.
W promised secure borders on 9/12.... W promised 2000 new agents per year....
Since they will not be apprehending any illegals, Bush may actually put the full 6,000 there.
The use of the National Guard to build more fences was spoken about in his speech last night:
"At the same time, we are launching the most technologically advanced border security initiative in American history. We will construct high-tech fences in urban corridors, and build new patrol roads and barriers in rural areas. We will employ motion sensors … infrared cameras … and unmanned aerial vehicles to prevent illegal crossings. America has the best technology in the world - and we will ensure that the Border Patrol has the technology they need to do their job and secure our border."
This is what I posted on May 13th:
I have a cousin in the Minute Man organization. He is telling me that the same technology used in prison fences would be used. They are talking about a 16 foot steel fence pitched at an angle to make climbing impossible. On top would be razor wire. Built in would be motion sensors and beams. Other electronic security measures would also be used: infrared sensing cameras, drones with cameras, etc.
And, this post on April 4th:
There is an old saying, "The cow has been let out of the barn." How does the cow get back into the barn? The answer: when she wants to come back in. The most important thing is to secure the barn. We need to erect a physical wall down the entire length of our southern border. Think through history how many countries have built walls. We can make this wall even more secure by high tech. They call it the virtual wall. With it we will know when someone is tunneling under the border or sneaking over in the dark of night. We will know when the border is being crossed like a smoke detector smells smoke. The Berlin Wall had 500 sentry stations. With a virtual wall, the sentries will be beems and drone aircraft loaded with infrared cameras. The only way one can cross the border will be at the official entry/exit points. When someone goes back to Mexico, they will need documentation--birth certificates etc. When someone goes to the United States, they will need an high tech work card that will be required to work. We can engineer other things to control our border. This is really not my expertise. Once we control the flow back and forth across the border, we create incentives for those who are here illegally to go through the naturalization process. One think I can think of, which brings home the cow analogy, is the idea of Social Security and retirement. If we can get the illegals to buy into Social Security, we can fix the Social Security system because of the lack of those paying into it. With Social Security, we can add strings, like the need to fulfill the requirements of naturalization. One incentive for this is that they will benefit from the prospect of retirement back in Mexico where their Social Security check will allow them to live their last days where their dollar goes a long ways. This would mean some sort of dual citizenship arrangement. The cows will go back to the barn when they retire. Those who save their money will also benefit and could retire early in Mexico. More cows will come home. Also, it would benefit to go back to Mexico for medical procedures (as some people have found out). If the only way is through the check points, you would increase the documentation process. One other thing, we need to modernize the naturalization process. This process puts too many people in a Catch-22 where they need to be employed to apply for naturalization and can't work unless their application has been accepted. Too many just don't bother with other bureaucratic complications and stay in the country illegally.
ICE practices catch and release.
yeah, yeah, I know the Prez said he'd end it. he doesn't need legislation to end that practice. he has no good track record to convince me I should believe him now.
Especially when Rep for the Prez Julie M goes on Hugh's show and starts talking down the fence and showing extreme relunctance to enforce the border.
They can say whatever they want, they have no desire to do it and I don't believe they will other then a few superficial grandstands to take the heat off.
When did non-citizens get more rights than Joe-Six-Pack citizens?
I know, I know, I am just another hate monger....sheesh
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.