Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boadicea May Have Had Her Chips On Site Of McDonald's
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 5-25-2006 | Nick Britten

Posted on 05/24/2006 8:59:01 PM PDT by blam

Boadicea may have had her chips on site of McDonald's

By Nick Britten
(Filed: 25/05/2006)

Archaeologists believe they may have found the final battle site for the warrior queen Boadicea - on the site of a McDonald's restaurant.

Having spent her life in fierce resistance to one empire - the Romans - her last stand is thought to have been overshadowed by another one, this time corporate.

Having found ancient artefacts where new houses and flats are due to be built, experts have now asked the local authority to allow a full excavation of the area.

Little is known about Boadicea's last fight, or the way in which she died, but it is widely believed to have taken place in the West Midlands. The site unearthed by experts, in Kings Norton, Birmingham, lies close to the line of a Roman road, and fits many of the few facts available.

The Queen of the Iceni tribe, the ancient native Britons, had a final showdown with Governor General Suetonius Paulinus in 61 AD. Her 200,000 soldiers were annihilated by just 10,000 legionaries, ending the British rebellion.

One of the most popular theories is that afterwards Boadicea killed herself by drinking from a poisoned chalice.

According to the Roman historian Tacitus, prior to battle Paulinus deliberately protected his legions by choosing a hilly area virtually surrounded by trees with a single opening.

Experts from Birmingham city council believe the Parsons Hill site matches this description with its landscape and mature woodland, and artefacts found in the dig indicate that Roman soldiers may have been there. The area of land next to the McDonald's is also near the Metchley Roman fort.

Cllr Peter Douglas Osborn, a conservationist, said: "I find it very exciting to think we may unearth something so intriguing right here in Birmingham. It would be bizarre if it is discovered Boadicea's last stand was next door to a McDonald's, but the site does fit the only descriptions we know of.

"It is on the route to Metchley, the Roman fort discovered in Birmingham and, if only because of this, it represents a real possibility.

"It is even more encouraging when you consider the evidence and well-preserved remains unearthed from trial trenches. The location itself matches previous historical descriptions of the battle site in that it is a hilly area surrounded by trees. It would be priceless if we found that this historic battle was fought outside a McDonald's fast food joint. I also hope the dig may unearth some evidence of what name the Romans gave Birmingham."

Dr Mike Hodder, Birmingham city council's senior archaeologist, added: "There's no doubt it's an important archaeological site. Whether it has anything to do with Boadicea is nearly impossible to prove, but there are certainly Roman remains found there."

A spokesman for McDonald's said: "Obviously if a site next to one of our restaurants is found to be where Boudica fought her last battle then we would be quite excited. However, we'll have to wait and see what the archaeologists find."

Boadicea was married to King Prasutagus, who ruled over the Iceni - the tribe occupying East Anglia - but under Roman authority. Despite the king, in a flawed attempt to curry favour with the Romans, making Emperor Nero a co-heir to his estates, Nero provoked Boadicea by forcing her people to endure conscription and pay heavy taxes.

The final outrage came when Prasutagus died in AD60 and the Romans annexed her dominions, flogging her in public and murdering and raping her family.

Boadicea vowed to take on Nero and his legions and other tribes from all over south-east Britain joined her. After the Roman towns of London, St Albans and Colchester were burned to the ground, troops were called down from Lincoln as Boadicea's warriors headed north and the armies clashed in the Midlands.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: battleofwatlingst; birmingham; boadicea; bodacious; boudicca; celt; celtic; celts; chips; freckles; godsgravesglyphs; iceni; kelt; kingsnorton; macdonalds; mancetter; mcdonalds; midlands; nuneaton; redhead; redheads; romanempire; site; tacitus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: 308MBR

I LOVE my redhead.


21 posted on 05/25/2006 8:49:25 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TR Jeffersonian

ping


22 posted on 05/25/2006 9:29:05 AM PDT by kalee (Send your senators the dictionary definition of "amnesty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 308MBR

Screw you.

It's not our fault that you're not man enough to handle us.


23 posted on 05/25/2006 9:34:07 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

LOL!


24 posted on 05/25/2006 9:36:30 AM PDT by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Not a fan I take it.


25 posted on 05/25/2006 9:36:41 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: norton
I have NEVER understood why the British put a statue of her up, instead of say Cassivellaunus or Caratacus; both of whom led resistance to the Romans, and in the case of Caratacus, a fairly long guerrilla war.

Bouddica, on the other hand, refused to allow the Iceni to plant a crop for the year of her revolt, leaving them to face starvation AND the Roman Army when she lost. Her only allies were the neighboring Trinovanti, and her practice of large scale murder didn't help her win may more allies.

Her strategic vision seemed to be limited to attacking civil centers, and looting [The IXth Legion stumbled into her], and she made no effort to find the bulk of the Roman Army which was in Wales, attacking Mona [the island of Anglesey (p/s ?)]and wiping out the Druids.

As I stated in an earlier post, she let the Romans choose a battlefield that negated her vast superiority in numbers and prevented flanking and envelopment. Her tactical plan went from 'mill around, mill!' to a clusterf*ck charging the best, and most disciplined heavy infantry in the world. She then fled the battlefield, leaving the people she'd taken there to a grisly fate. And the reprisals the Romans exacted on the Iceni, Trinovanti, and any tribe with members that joined her on their own was so severe that Paullinus was subsequently relieved of his command and governorship and recalled to Rome; and Britain never revolted again.

Fan? No.
26 posted on 05/25/2006 11:21:58 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Heh... or King Arthur for that matter... oh, wait, whomever the character Arthur represented, he was resisting the ancestors of the English, while Boadicea was resisting the Romans. Big difference. ;')

Had someone gotten rid of Nero a little earlier, the Romans were well on their way to conquest of all the British Isles, and I don't doubt that they would have succeeded.

Thanks for those posts.


27 posted on 05/25/2006 4:50:20 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I don't think they would have gone much farther than they did. The Romans, being the Romans, apparently did a cost/benefit analysis before they hit Britain. They apparently overestimated what the place was worth. One could argue that Bouddica KEPT the Romans in England. Nero, apparently, contemplated withdrawing because the upkeep was a net loss to the Treasury. While they were arguing about the dishonor of leaving, the biddy attacked. At that point NO Roman Emperor was going to allow withdrawal.

I think the cost analysis approach was one of the reasons the Romans never invaded Ireland, and made no serious attempt to overrun Scotland.
28 posted on 05/25/2006 5:01:59 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

The Romans didn't generally wall their cities until the 3rd century, and even colony towns were often unfortified. Boadicea destroyed undefended towns and mostly slaughtered defenseless civilians. When it came time to overwhelm a much smaller Roman force, pllllt, she was gone.

I really enjoyed reading Caesar's Commentaries on the Gallic Wars years ago, particularly the last book in which Vercingetorix was surrounded with a good sized force on a hilltop fort; Caesar built pallisades all the way around it, and knowing that all of Gaul was on its way to relieve Vercingetorix, built another set of pallisades on the outside, a sort of doughnut. That guy sure had a set of stones. ;')


29 posted on 05/25/2006 5:06:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Well, she certainly didn't do any worse against the Roman Legions than any number of other indigenous Euros. I guess the Germanic tribes had the best track record against the Romans, but I am not very well read on this subject.


30 posted on 05/25/2006 5:17:12 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Agricola made a very serious attempt to conquer Scotland, circumnavigated Britain, and found the Orkneys and perhaps the Shetlands, and then was recalled. In recent years a fortified Roman-era trading town in NE Ireland has been found. But the Romans had other pressing business elsewhere. :')


31 posted on 05/25/2006 6:34:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Salamander

That's the spirit! I'd fertilize your eggs.


32 posted on 05/25/2006 6:43:40 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
An alliance of German tribes led by Hermann the Cherusci [known by the Romans as Arminius] a Roman trained soldier, and, I believe a Roman citizen, ambushed three legions [XVII, XVIII, and XIX] under the extremely inept command of Quintillius Varus, and annihilated them [and their families and camp followers in a three day running battle in the Teutoburg Forest. [Hermann led them into the trap].Aside from punitive expeditions, and a mission to recover the lost eagles, and properly bury the dead, the Romans pulled back to the Rhine, and never sought to annex Germany east of that river again [although archaeologists are now finding a fairly extensive net of German-Roman settlements from before the battle. the three legions were never reconstituted.

Although not 'Euros', the peoples with the best track records against the Romans were the Carthaginians [Hannibal KILLED 50,000 Romans at Cannae], the Parthians almost entirely annihilated Crassus' army at Carrhae, and the Sassanid Persians [who actually captured a Caesar]. Second honors would go to the Huns and the Goths [Adrianople], but the Roman Army they faced was not the Roman Army of earlier times.
33 posted on 05/25/2006 7:59:43 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Arminius / Herman had trained as an auxiliary I believe, and also knew his victim. Turncoats definitely have an advantage. The battlefield was located about 15 or 20 years ago (hmm... maybe it was longer, brain fart), identified based on coins and other artifacts.

Afterward Augustus redrew the border, basing it on the Rhine, having (after the civil wars were over) cut the size of the regular army in half and making up the difference with auxiliary legions, to 58 legions (combined), plus the Praetorian Guard, and probably the naval forces (not sure they were in or out of the count of legions; there were, hmm, five major bases). The Romans maintained order and their frontiers for hundreds of years, even while the regular legions were no longer Roman.

Still in the time of Augustus, there were campaigns across the Rhine, and the Danube; colony towns were planted, and a system of (what we would call) bribery or payoffs were used to keep the neighbors across the frontier from getting restive. The largesse (and trade) moved backwards into the hinterlands, such that Roman-era goods are occasionally found in areas never held by the empire.


34 posted on 05/25/2006 8:13:48 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

To quote the mighty Meatloaf;

"I bet you say that to *all* the girls".


[but seriously....thanks]....;]


35 posted on 05/25/2006 9:46:10 PM PDT by Salamander (Cursed With Second Sight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr; SunkenCiv

Thanks to the both of you for filling me in on some of the relevant history and giving me some names and places to search out and learn about.


36 posted on 05/26/2006 6:47:37 AM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: blam

Why isn't it legal to punch headline writers?


37 posted on 05/26/2006 6:49:16 AM PDT by Psycho_Bunny (ISLAM: The Other Psychosis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Nice tagline.

The Upper German-Raetian border wall
http://www.limes-in-deutschland.de/limes_english.html


38 posted on 05/26/2006 7:48:28 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
"murdering and raping her family", but not in that order.

You sound awfully certain of that; are you really sure?

39 posted on 05/26/2006 3:18:51 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (DeportaciĆ³n por los todos ilegales ahora: Si, se puede!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Ewwwww.


40 posted on 05/26/2006 3:27:16 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson