Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iraqi Document: Highly Radioactive Atomic Neutron Device (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | June 18 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/18/2006 7:08:27 PM PDT by jveritas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-151 next last
To: jveritas

Maybe they were mass producing AM antenna cores to get better reception during Rush Limbaugh.

/enemedia spin


61 posted on 06/18/2006 9:19:37 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

bump!


62 posted on 06/18/2006 9:20:42 PM PDT by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SierraWasp
Now obviously, If Tony DID know something, he may not have wanted to discuss it for some strategic reason, I suppose.

RandallFlagg: WMDs = Cheese ^

63 posted on 06/18/2006 9:21:46 PM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Thank you once again!

prisoner6

64 posted on 06/18/2006 9:55:36 PM PDT by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great job jveritas, you are what the Stone-age press used to call an Investigative Reporter. You are a true patriot.

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


65 posted on 06/18/2006 10:02:03 PM PDT by bray (Hey Zaqueeri, don't Mess with Texas!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
I have a rhetorical, yet dead serious question. Why SHOULD the media disseminate all this potential WMD info we're reading here when the Administration didn't and doesn't lift a finger to tell the public about it themselves......and doesn't even seem to care. Hmmmm?

In this case under discussion, I don't buy the comments about divulging secrets. The papers written in Arabic were released by the government a good while ago and now are being translated and analyzed by our good freeper, JVeritas. For crying out loud what's going on here and why?

To me, the Administration is secretive even when it doesn't have to be. Can't it ever play hardball, EVER? Can't it ever point out triumphantly to public records (such as the papers Veritas is working on) which, properly explained, can put it in a good light for a change?

It makes me sick that the White House has a consistent record of fading away and almost forcing conservative TV pundits, radio talk show hosts and private citizens like Veritas and freepers to do the heavy lifting in both offense and defense.

I don't get it at all.

(......actually, I DO get it, and I don't like the answer one bit).

Leni

66 posted on 06/18/2006 10:12:12 PM PDT by MinuteGal (Mi casa es su casa. Mi pais es su pais. Mi dinero es su dinero. Mi..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: everyone


To whom (what reporters) have you all written with pointers to where this information can be found?


67 posted on 06/18/2006 10:20:04 PM PDT by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
(......actually, I DO get it, and I don't like the answer one bit).

No cajones?

68 posted on 06/18/2006 10:22:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Tantalum coated graphite isn't only used in uranium processing. It is used in any process where you don't want to diffuse graphite into some process you are working (molten metal or certain corrosive gases). Obviously it applies to uranium processing, but that isn't the only thing.

Additionally, people are getting too upset about the neutron source. It really isn't a big deal. It really isn't practical to make a powerful neutron flux outside of a nuclear reactor. These 'Highly Radioactive' neutron sources are no doubt trivial by comparison, and by physics. If I recall correctly it takes something like a hundred thousand alpha decays to yield ~50 neutrons (for an Am-Be neutron source). Not a particularly efficient process. Even the tiniest nuclear reactor would blow away the largest Am-Be source (or any other alpha-Be neutron source) by many many orders of magnitude.


69 posted on 06/18/2006 10:25:08 PM PDT by burzum (Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small minds discuss people.--Adm. Rickover)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

"Los Alamos National Laboratory scientists have developed a tantalum carbide-graphite composite material ..."
____________________________________
If so, the Chinese also have it now...thanks to Presidential aspirant Richardson!


70 posted on 06/18/2006 10:42:46 PM PDT by cowdog77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: RandyRep

"How do you distribute your translations?"

Not to worry ...


71 posted on 06/19/2006 2:09:21 AM PDT by Bobibutu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jveritas
Minor correction - the second neutron source device should be "Pu-Be", ie plutonium/beryllium. The plutonium emits alpha particles and when these hit the beryllium you get a neutron of about 4 MeV. The "u" is just visible in the original.

These are commercially available devices, most commonly used to measure rock porosity. One of their common applications is in prospecting for oil fields. They have essentially zero military significance.

And I agree with a previous poster: the "tantalum coated graphite" is much more problematic.

72 posted on 06/19/2006 2:17:32 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Good work !

Great article


73 posted on 06/19/2006 2:38:38 AM PDT by IrishMike (Democrats .... Stuck on Stupid, RINO's ...the most vicious judas goats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091; jveritas
And the national media does what????looks the other way, they couldn't be less interested in this.

Indeed. But Jveritas keeps plugging along, showing just how pathetic most "journalists" really are.

74 posted on 06/19/2006 4:35:38 AM PDT by Coop (Jack Murtha - Semper Treasonous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

One of the most interesting threads yet j. Thanks to all FReepers who made knowlegable contributions to the thread.


75 posted on 06/19/2006 4:42:52 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (“Double or triple our troubles and we would still be better off than any people on earth.”---Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jewels1091

The mainstream media is too busy covering important issues like Brangelina's baby, Britney's pregnancy and Lindsay Lohan's partying to cover something as "trivial" as this. Gag.


76 posted on 06/19/2006 5:00:58 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6; bray; IrishMike; prairiebreeze; Coop; MinuteGal

Thank you very much for all your support.


77 posted on 06/19/2006 5:12:08 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; SE Mom

Great work, jveritas and an important find.

Yesterday, Chris Wallace asked Tony Snow if he knew about the new information on WMD's in Iraq; Tony said he didn't.

I thought that was pretty interesting. Something may be percolating about this issue.


78 posted on 06/19/2006 5:13:25 AM PDT by Peach (Iraq/AlQaeda relationship http://markeichenlaub.blogspot.com/2006/06/strategic-relationship-between.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: burzum

What are the other applications for the Tantalum Coated Graphite that Iraq was using it for? It definitely can be used for corrosive applications but as I said before and as you noticed from page 84 and 133 of the UN documents I posted this combination of Tantalum and Graphite was prohibited, period. The UN document was very clear on putting this under the “Prohibited Nuclear Activity” section. Also see my post # 22 regarding the hidden uranium enrichment activities and again you see both Tantalum and Graphite as part of these activities.


79 posted on 06/19/2006 5:19:09 AM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: jveritas; Chena; Valin; M. Thatcher; DocRock; Calpernia; Madame Dufarge; Txsleuth; Peach; ...
Thanks jveritas! Sorry for the late ping all.

Iraqi Document: Highly Radioactive Atomic Neutron Device (Translation)

Release/Translation of Classified PreWar Docs ping. If you want to be added or removed to the ping list, please Freepmail me.

Please add the keyword prewardocs to any articles pertaining to this subject.

Operation Get The Truth Out

Operation Iraqi Freedom Documents

Documents from the Harmony Database

jveritas’s blog

Ray Robison’s blog

An Interview With a Citizen Translator and American Hero

80 posted on 06/19/2006 5:26:11 AM PDT by eyespysomething (Chuck Norris was what Willis was talkin' about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-151 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson