Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

September 2001 Document: Military Orders To Prepare For US Attacks Against Iraq After 9/11
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents ^ | June 20 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 06/20/2006 10:21:15 AM PDT by jveritas

In document ISGP-2003-00026334 there are two top secret memo dated September 24 2001 one of them (page 57 of the pdf document) talks about military urgent preparations for a US attack against Iraq and the other (page 6 of the pdf document) talks for urgent military preparations in case of US attacks against Afghanistan. These memos which came from the Iraq Air Force Command asked their troops to prepare as if “There is no way but a US attack against the country” and of course by country they mean Iraq.

Beginning of Translation of page 57 of document document ISGP-2003-00026334

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

Top Secret

The Command of the Air Force

The Commander Office

Number 246

Date 24 September 2001

To: Aide of the Commander for The Operations; Aide of the Commander for Training, Aide of the Commander for Technical Matters, Aide of the Commander for Administrative Matters, The Security Organization of the Air Force.

Subject: The Operations Cell Meeting

1. The top secret letter from the office of Chief of the Army Staff, R.A.J, A.S and Security/ 1/9/6 cell 7022 on 23 September 2001, the approval of the Mr. Chief of the Army Staff was obtained to work according to the recommendation shown below:

A. The Commands and Corps must act as if the American aggression against the country is no other way but happening and therefore this demand gain time and take the appropriate measures.

B. Confirm the importance of the security of the replacement headquarters and the evacuation sites because it will be targeted by the collaborators.

C. Instruct to absolutely prohibit the use the wireless devices and the mobile phones in the evacuation sites and the replacement headquarters for the purpose of these sites security.

D. Strongly insist that the commands of the First and Fifth Corps use more intelligence sources to obtain as much information as possible about the enemy in the sector ( American-Turkish- The gang of destruction) and notify us with any developments.

2. Mr. Commander viewed what was in it and his Excellency commented the following:

((Inform the Operations/ The Technical/ The Training/Administrative/ The Security Organization to do what is necessary)). Please do the necessary.

Signature….

Aviator General

Salem Ahmad Sultan Qassab

Secretary

24 September 2001.

(1-1)

Top Secret

End of translation of page 57.

Beginning of the translation of page 61 of document document ISGP-2003-00026334

In the Name of God the Most Merciful The Most Compassionate

Top Secret

The Command of the Air Force

The Commander Office

Number 247

Date 24 September 2001

To: All Aides

Subject: The Operation Cell meeting

1. The top secret letter from the office of Chief of the Army Staff, R.A.J, A.S and Security/ 1/9/1/7059 on 24 September 2001, Mr. Chairman of the Army Staff reviewed the minute of meeting of Operation Cell on 23 September 2001 and his Excellency approval was obtained for the following:

A. Inform the Commands, the Departments, all the Directorates and Establishments to immediately move to the Replacement Headquarters in case a strike occurred against Afghanistan.

B. Ensure that the border observation posts and the Air Defense posts to inspect and observe the sectors in precise fashion day and night with the necessity of the Air Defense Command an the Commands of the Corps to test and inspect the communication system and there will be committees coming in the next week from the General Headquarters to test what was mentioned above.

Mr. Commander reviewed what was in the letter and his Excellency commented with the following:

Inform all the Aides and the units of the Command Headquarters to work according to paragraph A for sure.

Please review and do what is necessary.

Signature….

Aviator General

Salem Ahmad Sultan Qassab


TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 200109; 20010924; 911; iraq; iraqiintelligence; jveritas; onfreep; plausibledeniablity; prewardocs; saddam; saddam911link; saddamhussein; statesponsor; waronterror; waronterrorism; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-146 next last
To: jveritas

Can we get a response on this from the so-called 9/11 commission? This needs to be thoroughly investigated and should become a lead news story. Your hard work is much appreciated. Where does it go from here?


81 posted on 06/20/2006 2:01:02 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Great information. Proving once again why those who want to be informed, visit FreeRepublic.


82 posted on 06/20/2006 2:09:58 PM PDT by Sergio (If a tree fell on a mime in the forest, would he make a sound?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sergio

The 9-11 commission primarily did what lumbering bureaucratic bodies do best for this type of thing. Present a legal case against those that could be "proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt."
Law enforcement meant to PUNISH, not prevent.


83 posted on 06/20/2006 2:16:33 PM PDT by ikez78 (www.markeichenlaub.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj

Thanks. I think to get the word out we need to have more media attention, and of course the administration must be supporting this as well.


84 posted on 06/20/2006 2:20:55 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Very interesting.
Thank you, Jveritas.


85 posted on 06/20/2006 2:28:12 PM PDT by Velveeta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Joseph,
The case will be best presented when there is a critical mass to push out all at once.
Not only is there information in those documents that will fill a ton of gaps that we (the public) don't know what was happening.
The information is there, it needs to be overwhelming, organized and then presented properly and pushed hard to our fellow bloggers and friendly media outlets.


86 posted on 06/20/2006 2:29:08 PM PDT by ikez78 (www.markeichenlaub.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

If you did this yourself from the original Arabic then you have my sincere apologies for my comment. My thoughts were directed to those websites that publish supposed translations of Arabic, particularly, only to have it sound like literal translations of Japanese instructions for VCRs 25 years ago. If the translation was yours then best is to be appreciated.


87 posted on 06/20/2006 2:34:42 PM PDT by xkaydet65 (Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

The translation is mine and so all other translations I posted so far on FreeRepublic, you can look it up on my FR profile page :)


88 posted on 06/20/2006 2:45:53 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65

I try to do literal translation as much as possible and thus the translations may look weak in term of English grammar and composition.


89 posted on 06/20/2006 2:48:57 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: ikez78

Agreed 100% and you are doing a great job in getting these documents out to the public.


90 posted on 06/20/2006 2:50:07 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thanks. BTTT


91 posted on 06/20/2006 3:00:09 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65; jveritas

You have no idea who jveritas is, do you?

Do a little research.


92 posted on 06/20/2006 4:00:02 PM PDT by BagCamAddict (Prayers for the victims - human and animal - of Katrina and Rita)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; jveritas
I agree, why oh why would Saddamn expect an attack unless....

Thanks, jveritas

93 posted on 06/20/2006 4:44:39 PM PDT by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand; but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc. 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave
Though Fox is on the right track, when they are on the air with this info, they and their spokesmen need to be more forceful and emphatic in presenting the evidence and interpreting its importance with respect to our attack and invasion of Iraq.

and isnt this why we hate CNN? Let the news programs be what they are.....JUST news programs and NOT cheerleaders for politicans

94 posted on 06/20/2006 4:51:42 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: shield

Anytime shield :)


95 posted on 06/20/2006 5:00:12 PM PDT by jveritas (Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: stuck_in_new_orleans
and isnt this why we hate CNN? Let the news programs be what they are.....JUST news programs and NOT cheerleaders for politicans

Ouch! Though I phrased it incorrectly, I meant spokesman for our side and the truth. Too often, they are not as polished or forceful like the representative of the left.

Having said that, this was the first TV appearance by the spokesman who presented the information and he did well given that fact.

96 posted on 06/20/2006 5:39:04 PM PDT by CedarDave (When a soldier dies, a protester gloats, a family cries, an Iraqi votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Gee, ya think Saddam knew we would consider 911 an act of war? Ya think he might have been in on it ? DUH!


97 posted on 06/20/2006 5:40:49 PM PDT by ladyinred (Liberals are dangerous for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

gotcha, sorry about that, I thought you were going another direction with your comment.


98 posted on 06/20/2006 5:45:09 PM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
Iraq was the only nation that didn't lower their flag at their UN mission in NYC after the 9/11 attacks. That was a red flag to me then and it is one of many I continue to feel today.

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

I truly believe 9/11 was a contract hit. Osama delivered the plan and the personnel while Saddam provided the diplomatic cover for money transfers and documents, and perhaps diplomatic papers allowing for passage of the perps.

JMO.

99 posted on 06/20/2006 6:05:19 PM PDT by mitchbert (Facts Are Stubborn Things .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ikez78

We need to start organizing a time-line on these docs and including other known information like the Iraq Perspectives Project, Stephen Hayes etc. so we can get a better idea of how things fit together. A Freeper, named piasa also has extensive chronology on what was happening in Iraq according to the media over a number of years. I think it might be a little difficult for some to grasp the significance of some of these documents without a meaningful context. Once a basic time-line is established, new documents can be inserted into it.


100 posted on 06/20/2006 7:38:23 PM PDT by Albertafriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson