Posted on 06/20/2006 10:21:15 AM PDT by jveritas
Can we get a response on this from the so-called 9/11 commission? This needs to be thoroughly investigated and should become a lead news story. Your hard work is much appreciated. Where does it go from here?
Great information. Proving once again why those who want to be informed, visit FreeRepublic.
The 9-11 commission primarily did what lumbering bureaucratic bodies do best for this type of thing. Present a legal case against those that could be "proven guilty beyond a shadow of a doubt."
Law enforcement meant to PUNISH, not prevent.
Thanks. I think to get the word out we need to have more media attention, and of course the administration must be supporting this as well.
Very interesting.
Thank you, Jveritas.
Joseph,
The case will be best presented when there is a critical mass to push out all at once.
Not only is there information in those documents that will fill a ton of gaps that we (the public) don't know what was happening.
The information is there, it needs to be overwhelming, organized and then presented properly and pushed hard to our fellow bloggers and friendly media outlets.
If you did this yourself from the original Arabic then you have my sincere apologies for my comment. My thoughts were directed to those websites that publish supposed translations of Arabic, particularly, only to have it sound like literal translations of Japanese instructions for VCRs 25 years ago. If the translation was yours then best is to be appreciated.
The translation is mine and so all other translations I posted so far on FreeRepublic, you can look it up on my FR profile page :)
I try to do literal translation as much as possible and thus the translations may look weak in term of English grammar and composition.
Agreed 100% and you are doing a great job in getting these documents out to the public.
Thanks. BTTT
You have no idea who jveritas is, do you?
Do a little research.
Thanks, jveritas
and isnt this why we hate CNN? Let the news programs be what they are.....JUST news programs and NOT cheerleaders for politicans
Anytime shield :)
Ouch! Though I phrased it incorrectly, I meant spokesman for our side and the truth. Too often, they are not as polished or forceful like the representative of the left.
Having said that, this was the first TV appearance by the spokesman who presented the information and he did well given that fact.
Gee, ya think Saddam knew we would consider 911 an act of war? Ya think he might have been in on it ? DUH!
gotcha, sorry about that, I thought you were going another direction with your comment.
I've said it before and I'll say it again:
I truly believe 9/11 was a contract hit. Osama delivered the plan and the personnel while Saddam provided the diplomatic cover for money transfers and documents, and perhaps diplomatic papers allowing for passage of the perps.
JMO.
We need to start organizing a time-line on these docs and including other known information like the Iraq Perspectives Project, Stephen Hayes etc. so we can get a better idea of how things fit together. A Freeper, named piasa also has extensive chronology on what was happening in Iraq according to the media over a number of years. I think it might be a little difficult for some to grasp the significance of some of these documents without a meaningful context. Once a basic time-line is established, new documents can be inserted into it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.