Posted on 11/08/2006 2:40:04 PM PST by Tarkus2040
"Yes, I do care. I worked quite hard to keep it from happening. But due to people like you who insisted so strongly that everything was just peachy, we lost. That is why it is so funny to see you guys keeping up your 'good' work."
How's that working out?
yep
Weiner said it again today. He said he thought Bush purposefully tried to get the dems elected in Congress so they would pass his immigration issue. As if that is the sole issue Bush cares about and is more important to him than terrorism, wiretapping, Iraq, taxes, SC judges, John Bolten, his legacy, etc etc Incredible.
"Then make up your mind about what confuses you, if you can."
Anybody know what this post is about?
Talk about changing the subject. I wasn't on a Rush or Levin or Hannity thread now was I????
32 House seats and 6 Senate seats to gain control isn't "squeaking".
Did you hear the interchange Savage played between Bush and that reporter?
Based on the answer Bush gave, Savage was correct in at least raising the idea.
I can't say I agree that it's true: but why would Bush say he would have a better chance of passing an immigration bill now?
It was a curious answer from Bush.
Okay, you have said alot of nonsense here.
Savage was never for a progressive tax. (sheesh)
Savage's favourite conservative was Goldwater. He speaks of him often.
Then you mixed up alot of your personal views with what you think of Savage's views. It's a little jumbled. (I'm not trying to criticize, just explain, because it's an interesting post)
Because it doesn't cover the whole border and he has no intention of funding it.
Q Scott, as you probably know, the Governor of South Dakota has now signed this abortion measure that the state legislature passed. Do you anticipate the administration will weigh in on this as it makes its way through the courts?
MR. McCLELLAN: Well, let me express to you the President's views. The President believes very strongly that we should be working to build a culture of life in America, and that's exactly what he has worked to do. We have acted in a number of ways, practical ways, to reduce the number of abortions in America. The President strongly supported the ban on partial-birth abortions. This is an abhorrent procedure, and we are vigorously defending that legislation. We have acted in a number of other ways, as well.
Now, I think this issue goes to the larger issue of the type of people that the President appoints to the Supreme Court. And the President has made it very clear he doesn't have a litmus test when it comes to the Supreme Court, that he will nominate people to the bench that strictly interpret our Constitution and our laws. But this is law that was passed by the South Dakota legislature and signed into law by the Governor of that state. And the President's view when it comes to pro-life issues has been very clearly stated, and his actions speak very loudly, too.
Q So, again -- now it's going to wend its way through the courts. Will the administration weigh in, in the appeals process that is going to inevitably --
MR. McCLELLAN: Again, this is a state -- this is a state law.
Q No, but it's going to become a federal matter --
MR. McCLELLAN: It's a state matter.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/03/20060307-2.html
spokesman can't answer question. I did not know this. YET, The President has been against assisted-suicide and other state laws.
Savage is a jew boy who hates his self and every thing good for America see hollywood elete same kind.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.