Skip to comments.
Security Is Focus of Revised Effort on Immigration
The New York Times ^
| June 14, 2007
| ROBERT PEAR
Posted on 06/13/2007 10:45:07 PM PDT by Baladas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
So now their talking points are to spend more money implementing amnesty and that's supposed to make everybody fall in love with it. I wish they'd stop trying to distract Americans as if they talking to a two-year-old.
Pig, lipstick, pig.
1
posted on
06/13/2007 10:45:08 PM PDT
by
Baladas
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Baladas
More BS, damn, just damn.
3
posted on
06/13/2007 10:48:07 PM PDT
by
OKIEDOC
(Kalifornia, DUNCAN or THOMPSON 08, ELECTION 2008, MOST IMPORTANT OF MY LIFE TIME)
To: Baladas
Ha,ha, the bullshitters try another ploy and I laugh !!!
4
posted on
06/13/2007 10:50:10 PM PDT
by
Obie Wan
To: Baladas
They're trying to buy support for amnesty with pork. But putting lipstick on the amnesty pig won't change the fact its still an amnesty pig.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
5
posted on
06/13/2007 10:51:26 PM PDT
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: Baladas
They want $3-5 billion for border security. Riiiiggghhhtttt. Those little 'porkie' pigs will get their hands on that allocation and reroute it as they always do ... say for eco-bike paths on the border or subsidizing peanut farmers in timbucktoo.
PS...The GOP called me today for a donation... they got an earful.
6
posted on
06/13/2007 10:53:36 PM PDT
by
BigFinn
To: Baladas
Senator Arlen Specter, Republican of Pennsylvania, said the extra money could persuade the American people and reluctant senators to support the bill. Extra money? Specter has "EXTRA MONEY"? no, he has MY MONEY!
7
posted on
06/13/2007 10:54:37 PM PDT
by
Lijahsbubbe
("I'll see you at the bill signing" - Pres Bush)
To: Baladas
The White House and senators from both parties mapped out possible changes in a comprehensive immigration bill on Wednesday, so they could better portray it as a way to bolster national security rather than to grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.
In other words, what cosmetic tinkering do they need to do so that they can achieve their real objective, the continued free flow of cheap labor across the border. They must think that we were just born yesterday.
To: Baladas
Its a matter of our national security, Mr. Kennedy said Wednesday. We have broken borders and a broken immigration system. LOL!
Now you notice-after the bill was knocked down!
9
posted on
06/13/2007 10:57:52 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
To: Baladas
They really think we are stupid.
They think that they can throw a few bones our way and we will just roll over?
Do they think we are politicans?
10
posted on
06/13/2007 10:59:39 PM PDT
by
fortheDeclaration
(We must beat the Democrats or the country will be ruined! - Lincoln)
To: Baladas
This is like Bill Clinton coming up with a strategy for selling the American public on his ideas concerning marital fidelity.
11
posted on
06/13/2007 11:02:01 PM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
("You will have your bipartisanship." - Fred Thompson, May 4, 2007)
To: Baladas
12
posted on
06/13/2007 11:17:57 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: Obie Wan
Yeah. It’s still a pig without enough lipstick.
13
posted on
06/13/2007 11:21:41 PM PDT
by
hdstmf
To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..
To: Baladas
These guys must be f^*&ing dense. Every day I go to work and after a long day I get home and read about yet another attempt to revive this travesty of a bill. What is it about “NO” that they don’t understand? We want the borders secured and employers penalized. Those two things together will take care of 90% of the illegal immigration problem. Why they want to wrap other things (i.e. amnesty-like solutions) into the same bill indicate to me that amnesty is their one goal, and all the talk about borders and employers is simply lip service. I feel like I’m banging my head against the wall with these Senators, and right now I just feel like cracking their skulls for once. Every US Senator who pushes this particular bill needs to meet a dastardly fate in the next election. And, recalls are in order for those not up in 2008.
15
posted on
06/14/2007 12:15:01 AM PDT
by
Azzurri
To: Baladas
16
posted on
06/14/2007 12:15:36 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: TomGuy
BS Bull Sh....
MS More Shi
PHD Piled highest and deepest!
17
posted on
06/14/2007 12:17:43 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: Azzurri
“Every US Senator who pushes this particular bill needs to meet a dastardly fate in the next election. And, recalls are in order for those not up in 2008.”
Amen, brother!!
18
posted on
06/14/2007 12:19:18 AM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: Baladas
Tony Snow, the White House press secretary, expressed interest in a Republican proposal to take all fees and fines collected under the bill and use the money for enforcement. You mean the money collected under the laws that HAVEN'T AND WON'T BE ENFORCED?
Yeah, I believe that one's gonna fly.
\sarc
To: Baladas
20
posted on
06/14/2007 12:31:31 AM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(Fred Thompson/John Bolton 2008)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson