Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thompson backers hope red pickup also to hit campaign trail again
WKRN ^ | August 21, 2007, 7:01 pm | By ERIK SCHELZIG

Posted on 08/21/2007 5:10:38 PM PDT by xcamel

More than a dozen years after it was credited with helping turn around his first bid for public office, Fred Thompson's old pickup truck sits parked behind his mother's house in this Nashville suburb.

The red paint is faded and the tailgate hangs open, but supporters would like nothing more than to see the actor-politician leap back into the bed to make stump speeches in his bid for the White House.

The Republican has not yet announced his candidacy _ that's expected next month _ and there's been no word from Thompson's campaign about whether there will be any role for a red pickup truck. A spokeswoman for Thompson did not respond to messages seeking comment about the truck.

Early in the 1994 race, after struggling to connect with voters, Thompson decided to lease a used truck and drive around the state in what turned out to be a wildly successful effort to recast himself as a folksy man of the people.

His opponent, Democratic U.S. Rep. Jim Cooper, derided the truck as a cynical prop to deflect attention from Thompson's inside-the-Beltway status. But Thompson was able to shake off Cooper's suggestion that he was actually a "Gucci-wearing, Lincoln-driving, Perrier-drinking, Grey Poupon-spreading millionaireWashington special interest lobbyist."

Thompson ended up capturing more than 60 percent of the vote.

Bill Lacy, hired this month to run Thompson's campaign, has a bit of personal history with the truck _ he opposed the proposal to make the pickup a focal point when he was an adviser on the 1994 campaign.

"Fred had the good sense to ignore my advice," Lacy said in an opinion piece in The Knoxville News Sentinel in June.

But Thompson so far has not appeared overly eager to climb back into the cab. At his first public event in Nashville after forming a "testing the waters" committee in June, Thompson shook off an attempt by supporters tohave him address the crowd from the back of a brand new red pickup truck they had brought to the event.

___

On the Net:

Fred Thompson: http://www.imwithfred.com


TOPICS: Extended News; Politics/Elections; US: Tennessee
KEYWORDS: 2008; election2008; electionpresident; elections; fredheads; fredthompson; gop; republicans; runfredrun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: Beelzebubba

Nope. Wife didn’t like them, but hope to get one soon anyway.


141 posted on 08/21/2007 8:23:29 PM PDT by Laptop_Ron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron

I am frankly quite happy that he’s holding off on announcing his entry into the race. The campaign starts way too early and I’m already tired to death of it. Fred Thompson is forcing the MSM to play the game his way. I like the way he campaigns without being in the campaign!

As far as I’m concerned the MSM and the political powers that be are way too influential in deciding who will be elected. I like it when Fred goes against their conventional wisdom and drags it out. Everyone knows he’s in the race!


142 posted on 08/21/2007 8:26:02 PM PDT by jwparkerjr (Sigh . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jwparkerjr

Personally, I would like to know how the MSM figured that Rudy should be the front runner. They were saying that before any polls came out or anything.


143 posted on 08/21/2007 8:27:52 PM PDT by Laptop_Ron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron

Freepmail me if you want some serious advice. But buy “Boston’s Gun Bible” first.

Seriously.

Welcome!


144 posted on 08/21/2007 8:32:27 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

Advice about what? I’m not sure I’m seeing where you’re going and I’m trying to avoid misunderstandings since I’ve already been involved with one tonight. Is that too paranoid? LOL


145 posted on 08/21/2007 8:34:31 PM PDT by Laptop_Ron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron

Advice about that which you hope to get one soon.


146 posted on 08/21/2007 8:35:50 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed ("We do have tough gun laws in Massachusetts; I support them, I won't chip away at them" -Mitt Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: paulat; Laptop_Ron
Don't let this poster get you down ... I believe that's his purpose.

It's a typical troll activity. Pull up a long ago registered FR name (usually one of many), and use it to have fun irritating Conservatives.

If you read back through this individual's posts on the tread, it is the typical troll pattern.

It starts out with "I like so and so, but ...", then goes through "I guess I don't have all the information I need, so could you folks enlighten me about ....", and finally to "I'm real sorry if I have offended anyone, it really wasn't my purpose, honest!"

If he isn't zapped by then, he will just go through the cycle again, only taking enough time out to report his efforts to his partners on some anti-FR forum.

Ignoring him, along with simply pointing out his trollish behavior to new thread readers who come onto the thread thinking he is playing for real, usually forces him out into the open, and causes him to go way over the line in his frustration, resulting in a loss of posting privileges.

147 posted on 08/21/2007 8:47:38 PM PDT by Col Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Col Freeper

Ummm, who’s the troll in this scenario?


148 posted on 08/21/2007 9:10:50 PM PDT by Laptop_Ron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
1. Its early Exhibit #1 >>Ronald Reagan Announcing his candidacy for President New York Hilton November 13, 1979

When Reagan ran, the NH Primary was the first week of March. There's every indication that this time it will be moved up to December of 2007. Furthermore, Reagan had nearly won the nomination in '76, and so was already well known and vetted. It isn't 1980, Carter isn't in the WH, and Fred Thompson is no Ronald Reagan.

149 posted on 08/21/2007 9:13:08 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: paulat

>>now you know why a lot of us hate...yes hate...Duncan Hunter people for ruining Free Republic.

This used to be a great site...you folks have ruined it forever. A lot of us have left. I have stopped supporting financially. Duncan Hunter is a loser politician who stayed in his “safe” Congressional seat for 30 years without accomplishing anything more. He will NEVER be MY President.

I’m kicking myself for being nice to you for so long.<<

Wow, where did that come from?
Congressman Hunter is a good guy - its natural that Freepers would be taking a look at him.

I don’t think he’s quite The Guy, though.
When I see Congressman Hunter, I think - “Secretary of Defense” rather than “Commander in Chief.”

But even if he’s not The Guy that doesn’t make Freepers who disagree into bad people.


150 posted on 08/21/2007 9:15:29 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

>>When Reagan ran, the NH Primary was the first week of March. There’s every indication that this time it will be moved up to December of 2007. Furthermore, Reagan had nearly won the nomination in ‘76, and so was already well known and vetted. It isn’t 1980, Carter isn’t in the WH, and Fred Thompson is no Ronald Reagan.<<

Its not like Thompson is wasting this time - he’s shuffling his team, lining up big donors and getting face time in Iowa.

The NH Primary is most likely to get moved up by 8 weeks while Thompson is likely to announce 6 weeks earlier than a traditional November late entry, like President Reagan’s.

A 2 week narrower window isn’t a big deal if his team is already on the ground. If Thompson gets the nomination, does anybody think the Republican establishment will fail to fund him equally with the Democratic nominee? He’s fine.


151 posted on 08/21/2007 9:25:34 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

I don’t know about that.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2007/08/is-fred-thompso.html


152 posted on 08/21/2007 9:35:41 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: paulat; Laptop_Ron

>I will grant you one thing, you are right...Duncan Hunter has been in the House for 30 years and not achieved anything worthy of the White House 30 freakin’ YEARS!!!<

Wow! Now that’s what I call an out and out grossly misleading statement! (Rep. Hunter has been serving very effectively in Congress for 26, not 30, years.) And you said with such hostility!


153 posted on 08/21/2007 9:48:34 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
The NH Primary is most likely to get moved up by 8 weeks while Thompson is likely to announce 6 weeks earlier than a traditional November late entry, like President Reagan’s.

The NH primary has been moved up at least twice since Reagan ran. November hasn't been "traditional" for years. Sept. declarations have been the last entries, and they were few and far between in the last three election cycles, with March through June more typical. Even Bush, running unopposed in 2004, announced in May, 2003.

I know that this has been the conventional wisdom talking point among the Fred Fans, but it just isn't true. I looked up the candidate entry dates for 2000 and 2004 a couple of weeks ago. Look here for 2000 and here for 2004.

154 posted on 08/21/2007 10:07:53 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird

>>The NH primary has been moved up at least twice since Reagan ran. November hasn’t been “traditional” for years. Sept. declarations have been the last entries, and they were few and far between in the last three election cycles, with March through June more typical.<<

And September is when he is likely to declare. Remember, he is only entering because the field is weak and the front runners are not conservative - that’s not the same as having planned this for 4 years.

I’d be willing to bet that every Presidential election since Nixon has had at least one candidate enter or almost enter and back out in September or after - but only Fred is getting nagged about it. (Last time it was Clark and Sharpton)

Oh well, if this is all people have bad to say about him then it could be worse.

For myself, I really need to hear more of where he stands - the day he declares is irrelevant to me.


155 posted on 08/21/2007 10:18:03 PM PDT by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
For myself, I really need to hear more of where he stands

A lot more, and what policies he intends to implement those positions.

That, and see how he stands up under the interrogation lights. It's a brutal and unfair process, but it gives a good indication of how well the person will do with a 4 year long anal probe.

156 posted on 08/21/2007 10:42:11 PM PDT by LexBaird (Tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
still waiting Fred.....

I am thinking he has just about gone too long on his "declaration".....I am getting sick of hearing about him "going to" announce anyday now....

157 posted on 08/21/2007 10:43:23 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry

not hardly...


158 posted on 08/22/2007 2:53:06 AM PDT by xcamel (FDT/2008 -- talk about it >> irc://irc.freenode.net/fredthompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron
My guess is they feel they have the most dirt on him and if they can trick us into nominating him then they can cut loose with the attacks. You can be they are going to be backing the person they feel they are most likely to be able to help defeat. The more they come on against someone the more I think that person should get careful consideration from our side.

I will certainly back Rudy if he is the nominee, but I really worry that someone has dirt on him that hasn’t surfaced him yet and that dirt will be used against him the moment he becomes the nominee. At this point I’m pretty sure Hillary will be the Dem nominee. She will be defeat able if we can turn out the vote. She is disliked by so many in her own party that it seems to me she starts behind the curve.

It’s going to be an interesting, and very frustrating, campaign season.

159 posted on 08/22/2007 5:48:38 AM PDT by jwparkerjr (Sigh . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Laptop_Ron
Chill out...you must have missed this story:

LOS ANGELES - If Fred Thompson makes it official and throws his hat in the ring for President, NBC will pull future reruns of "Law & Order" featuring the actor after Sept. 1, executive producer Dick Wolf said yesterday.Wolf, reading from an official NBC statement yesterday, said the rule applies when a person legally qualifies as a candidate.

"If Fred Thompson formally declares his intention to run for President, NBC will not schedule any further repeats of 'Law & Order' featuring Mr. Thompson beyond those already scheduled, which conclude on Saturday, Sept. 1," Wolf said. Wolf assured that NBC would take all "appropriate steps consistent with FCC regulations." Thompson fans would, however, be able to see him in reruns airing on TNT.

NY Daily News

He will announce after Sep 1st, announcing before that would have not only been against FCC regs, but would have cut royalties for the rest of the cast of L&O.

160 posted on 08/22/2007 6:18:30 AM PDT by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson