Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politics Today: Thompson has tough fight to stay in contest
Memphis Commercial Appeal ^ | 1/7/8 | Blake Fontenay

Posted on 01/07/2008 12:12:29 PM PST by SmithL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath
Fred’s wife wants him to be President, I’m not so sure Fred does.

And from where did you pull that particular piece of garbage?

61 posted on 01/07/2008 4:06:08 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Well, if Arkansan Bill Clinton could pick Tennesseean Algore as his veep candidate, and then go on to win the 1992 election, maybe Clinton's fellow Arkansan Mike Huckabilly would be wise to pick Fred as his running mate!
62 posted on 01/07/2008 4:16:48 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek

> Memphis should be the heart of Thompson country <

I think of Memphis as Ford country.

(E.g., Harold, senior and junior, etc.)


63 posted on 01/07/2008 4:21:35 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

That too!


64 posted on 01/07/2008 4:28:54 PM PST by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic

“You are however correct that doing well in early primaries can often translate into campaign donations, so they do have some importance in that regard, and they do skew the nomination process some because of that, but you still can’t say that if someone comes in low in the pack on the first couple primaries that the race is over for them.”

That was what I meant...and the momentum that a win can generate. You’re correct that a poor finish in NH doesn’t doom Fred, although it could doom Romney or McCain and it doesn’t have any effect on Rudy at all. However in states where the candidate should do well and instead narrowly hangs on, well that can be a killer. I wouldn’t think Freds 3rd place finish in Iowa was a bad showing except that he lived there for the 2 weeks leading up to the caucus. He toured the state, spent money on ads, and did lots of meet & greets, and still ended in a virtual tie with McCain, who didn’t campaign there at all. Rudy can tank in all the early contests, but if he tanks in FL. where he’s been spending time and money, well he’s in trouble. He can probably get a pass with a 2nd place finish, but a 3rd place finish will be hard to shake off.


65 posted on 01/07/2008 4:37:56 PM PST by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

“Thompson needs to dig deep on Huck and have a dossier on all the crap from his governorship down to the last detail, then start shouting it from the mountaintops.”

Agreed!


66 posted on 01/07/2008 6:30:41 PM PST by Bizhvywt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
So did I, How on earth could anyone come up with that screwy idea!!!!!?
67 posted on 01/07/2008 9:01:14 PM PST by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

And how do you know that? Did dhe call you and tell you so? Good Lord, think before you speak!


68 posted on 01/07/2008 9:03:16 PM PST by lolhelp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: odin219

are you nuts? He lies - he never answered the 500 mil tax increases questions that were asked over and over at the debate on Sat.
he is against school choice-
amnesty to illegals

He is Elmer Gantry


69 posted on 01/07/2008 9:07:23 PM PST by EdArt (free to be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: lolhelp

Ummm... those backing huckster are not tethered to reality well! :-)

LLS


70 posted on 01/08/2008 4:22:20 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Support America, Kill terrorists, Destroy dims and vote Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob

Trends.... are what they are if others aren’t watching the polls.

The PROBLEM with polls NOW is that there are a lot of people who are solely basing their voting upon those polls. So, the more the “trend” shows something going in one direction, the more you’re going to pull in to VOTE in the “trendy manner”.

It’s a fact, talk to people around you are semi-ignorant of politics and ask them about who they are voting for and why. You will discover a good majority of them are doing it “because everyone else is”. So, disagree all you like, and certainly under other circumstances (less communications, less information available than we have today!) then you’d be right, but in this case, you’re wrong.


71 posted on 01/08/2008 6:38:53 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, who finished first in Iowa's Republican caucuses, is a fellow Southerner who espouses many of the same conservative principles that Thompson does.

BS.

72 posted on 01/08/2008 6:44:22 AM PST by RockinRight (Huck(abee, not the Freeper Huck) Sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

“It’s a fact, talk to people around you are semi-ignorant of politics and ask them about who they are voting for and why. You will discover a good majority of them are doing it “because everyone else is”.”

Well then, that would imply that the polls are correct. If the polls show McCain surging and that adds to his surge, then the poll is in fact correct. I don’t care if you believe the polls or not, but they got it right in Iowa, and my guess is they’ll get it right, or pretty close in NH. Were you one of the folks here in Nov 2006 insisting the GOP would keep the senate and the house because the polls were all bogus? Or are you a Fred Head who is having a hard time facing the fact that he’s tanking?


73 posted on 01/08/2008 6:50:40 AM PST by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob

No, it would imply a “self fulfilling prophecy”.

If people are casting voted based on what they are READING in the polls, then the polls are skewing based on that alone.

No, I wasn’t insisting any such thing in 2006. Yes, I’m a Fredhead, but that’s not why I am talking about this. It’s got nothing to do with “facing facts”. lol

The facts are, as someone said, “what they are”. Fred will win, or he won’t. It’s not BASED on the polls though. The polls are completely meaningless in all of this - unless they are EXIT polls.

These so-called “entrance polls” are less than useless because people going IN to vote are regularly saying they “don’t know whom they are voting for yet”.

Duh


74 posted on 01/08/2008 7:25:18 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson
How about this:

Huckabee: Congress spends like Edwards at a beauty shop ...

Mike Huckabee stops bythe 'beauty shop' (remind you of John Edwards?)


75 posted on 01/08/2008 7:30:19 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I continue to be astounded at the press and the way they are CONSTANTLY trying to kill off the Thompson campaign.

The media must be scared to death of Thompson. I’ve never seen anything like this.


76 posted on 01/08/2008 7:33:57 AM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rick.Donaldson

“The facts are, as someone said, “what they are”. Fred will win, or he won’t. It’s not BASED on the polls though. The polls are completely meaningless in all of this - unless they are EXIT polls.”

And again, they show trends, or is your position that the polls didn’t show Huckabee trending up in Iowa, or that they don’t currently show McCain trending up in NH. The polls are written in stone tablets, they don’t predetermine anything, they just show snapshots of whenever the poll was taken.
Like I said believe the polls or don’t, I don’t care one way or another. So far Rasmussen has been pretty accurate in their forecasts. That doesn’t mean that they can’t miss, just that they show which way things are trending.
BTW a “Self Fulfilling Prophecy” is still fulfilled.
You’re correct about the facts being what they are, and right now the fact is Fred is struggling, not done, not out, but struggling.


77 posted on 01/08/2008 7:35:21 AM PST by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob

“The polls are written in stone tablets,”

Should read: are not written in stone tablets


78 posted on 01/08/2008 7:37:00 AM PST by snarkybob (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: snarkybob
The polls are (not) written in stone tablets, they don’t predetermine anything, they just show snapshots of whenever the poll was taken.

this is all I've been saying. I'm not sure what you're arguing with me about :)

Look, I'm saying that the "trends" are inaccurate. I'm saying that if PEOPLE are reading the "trends" and then voting "with the trend" then the polls aren't ANYTHING, they are less than useless, and that is that. If the fact were that people weren't reading the polls first to "see who is electable".... then they might mean something.

All in all, they are meaningless, and so are all these little primaries taken individually. As a WHOLE they mean something. NH and Iowa are NOTHING.
79 posted on 01/08/2008 7:49:54 AM PST by Rick.Donaldson (http://www.transasianaxis.com - Visit for lastest on DPRK/Russia/China/Etc --Fred Thompson for Prez.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: outofstyle

A brokered convention will seriously hurt whatever candidate emerges from it. The conventions, which used to be held in the mid-summer, have been pushed later and later on the calendar.

In 2004, the Republican convention was almost a month after the Democrats’ — that gave Bush the advantage of continuing to spend from his primary election funds, keeping his general election powder dry for the home stretch. This time, the late convention could bite the GOP on the butt.

If the Dems coalesce around a candidate before the first of spring and the Republicans don’t know who their candidate will be until the first week of September, Obama — or whoever the Dem winds up being — will have three times as long to build his organization and get his message out.

The old — and somewhat, but not wholly, discredited — wisdom is that voters make up their minds by Labor Day. If the Republicans don’t even have a candidate until Labor Day, that i not likely to end happily for the GOP.


80 posted on 01/08/2008 7:51:47 AM PST by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson