Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

N. Korea not a 'nuclear power,' but has nukes: U.S. official
Yonhap News ^ | 12/13/08 | Hwang Doo-hyong

Posted on 12/14/2008 2:09:37 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

N. Korea not a 'nuclear power,' but has nukes: U.S. official

By Hwang Doo-hyong

WASHINGTON, Dec. 13 (Yonhap) -- A senior Pentagon official reiterated on Saturday that the U.S. government does not accept North Korea as a nuclear power, but added that he understands Pyongyang has several nuclear bombs.

"Our objective is to make sure North Korea does not keep that capability," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue.

The United States has been facing skepticism over its policy of not regarding the North as a nuclear power, in light of recent reports and comments by officials that indicate otherwise.

In an article appearing in the January-February edition of the U.S.-based Foreign Policy magazine, titled "Reprogramming the Pentagon for a New Age," Defense Secretary Robert Gates is quoted as saying: "There is the potentially toxic mix of rogue nations, terrorist groups, and nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons. North Korea has built several bombs, and Iran seeks to join the nuclear club." The Pentagon official said the quote by Gates "reflects the judgment of the U.S. government intelligence community and that's nothing new." He cited as the most recent example a report of the National Intelligence Council (NIC) released in November.

The NIC report, titled "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World," contains a passage that reads: "The possibility of a future disruptive regime change or collapse occurring in a nuclear weapon state such as North Korea also continues to raise questions regarding the ability of weak states to control and secure their nuclear arsenals."

The NIC report is the third such example in which the U.S. describes North Korea as a nuclear state despite its official policy. The U.S. Joint Forces Command (JFC) drew controversy after it released a report on Dec. 4 that described North Korea as an Asian nuclear power along with China, India, Pakistan and Russia.

Some critics say that more than a decade of fruitless international efforts towards the communist state's nuclear disarmament have taught Washington to learn how to live with a nuclear-armed North Korea. Others say the U.S. government's primary goal should now be halting North Korea's alleged nuclear nonproliferation, amid rising concerns over terrorists obtaining radioactive "dirty bombs."

The Pentagon official disagreed. "The U.S., South Korea and the rest of the international community support the U.N. resolution for a non-nuclear North Korea. That's why we have six-party talks towards the North's denuclearization." The official said he hoped the JFC would soon correct what he described as a "mistake" in its recent report. "I am sure the JFC will be taking care of correcting it," he said, but said he was not aware of when that might happen. He added the JFC's report "reflects the views of individuals, not the policy of the U.S. government."

Another official, however, expressed doubts that the JFC would alter the report, titled "Joint Operating Environment (JOE) 2008: Challenges and Implications for the Future Joint Force."

North Korea detonated its first nuclear device in October 2006 and claimed the test was a success. Experts and policymakers continue to debate that claim.

U.S. and South Korean intelligence authorities have said the North has enough plutonium to produce several nuclear warheads, but have yet to officially confirm whether Pyongyang actually possesses such weaponry. Some say the North has developed a primitive nuclear warhead that cannot be loaded on any delivery system, while others claim Pyongyang's technology is more advanced.

President-elect Obama said on the campaign trail that the North has eight nuclear weapons, but did not elaborate. The U.S. president-elect has said he will support the six-party nuclear talks while seeking more direct bilateral engagement.

The latest round of six-party talks ended Thursday without an agreement over how to verify North Korea's nuclear facilities. Some observers suspect Pyongyang is waiting for Obama's inauguration on Jan. 20.

North Korean state media has picked up on the controversy over the JFC report. Pyongyang's official Korean Central News Agency said Wednesday in reference to the document, "It is the first time that a U.S. government report has acknowledged and announced that North Korea is a nuclear weapons state."

Jack Pritchard, president of the Washington- based Korea Economic Institute, recently urged the incoming Obama administration to quickly address the North Korean nuclear issue, saying, "The longer North Korea possesses nuclear weapons, the harder for them to give it up."

Pritchard, formerly the U.S. point man on North Korea, said in April he was told by officials in Pyongyang they expected to be able to keep a small arsenal of nuclear weapons.

Obama has said his administration will seek a drastic curtailment of nuclear arms globally, including in the U.S., to buttress the fragile Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Some have criticized the treaty on the grounds that the world's largest nuclear powers have so far been reluctant to do their part in disarming.

"By keeping our commitment under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, we'll be in a better position to press nations like North Korea and Iran to keep theirs," Obama said on the campaign trail.

North Korea has long questioned the legitimacy of the non-proliferation regime, which guarantees nuclear weapons for five existing nuclear powers -- the U.S., China, Russia, Britain and France -- while denying other states.

Pyongyang broke from NPT in 2002 after the U.S. claimed that Pyongyang had clandestinely developed a uranium-based nuclear program in violation of the 1994 Geneva framework agreement.

North Korea has denied both the existence of the uranium program and the proliferation of its nuclear technology to Syria, as the U.S. has alleged. Those have been major sticking points in the ongoing six-party denuclearization talks, which began in 2003 to replace the 1994 agreement.

U.S. President George W. Bush said in August that he was not sure whether North Korea has any real intention to abandon its nuclear weapons. "That's the fundamental question, and I can't answer that for you," he said.

North Korea considers its nuclear arsenal as its only working deterrent against an outside invasion, and has witnessed how Pakistan and India have resumed amicable ties with the U.S. years after performing nuclear tests.

North Korean media have also said that Iraq was invaded due to lack of nuclear arsenal.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nkorea; northkorea; nuclear; nuke
N. Korea not a 'nuclear power,' but has nukes: U.S. official

Another day brings another manufactured phrase we are forced to parse.

1 posted on 12/14/2008 2:09:37 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; nw_arizona_granny; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 12/14/2008 2:10:01 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I wonder if the Iranian policy will work as good as the N. Korean policy?


3 posted on 12/14/2008 2:12:16 AM PST by screaminsunshine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
N. Korea not a 'nuclear power,' but has nukes: U.S. official

That depends on what they consider the definition of what a (nuke) is.

4 posted on 12/14/2008 2:26:27 AM PST by Evil Slayer (Sarah Palin reminds me of the story about David and Goliath (1 Samuel 17:1-11, 41-50)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
"A senior Pentagon official...who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue."

Translation: Robert Gates doesn't want to have the comments attributed to him. HE is the 'anonymous source', and is complicit in the Bush Administration's abysmal legacy-building efforts to get an agreement, ANY agreement with Pyongyang so Jorge can ride off into the sunset waving a piece of paper just like Chamberlain, "peace in our time for the Korean people", yeah right.
5 posted on 12/14/2008 3:32:55 AM PST by mkjessup (43 prior Presidents did NOT spend six-figure sums to hide the details of their birth certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

“By keeping our commitment under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, we’ll be in a better position to press nations like North Korea and Iran to keep theirs”

Almost sounds like: “by enacting more gun control laws, criminals will be less likely to have guns”


6 posted on 12/14/2008 3:36:03 AM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

semantics. wonderful


7 posted on 12/14/2008 4:46:42 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Evil Slayer

>> N. Korea not a ‘nuclear power,’ but has nukes: U.S. official
> That depends on what they consider the definition of what a (nuke) is.

They don’t get it, but I see you do.
We dropped ATOMIC bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Nobody has ever had a nuclear (H-Bomb) dropped on them.
Massive difference in destructive power. Not to say that an atomic bomb is a nothing. Fission (Atomic) = City Buster or smaller. Fusion (H-Bomb) = County Buster or worse.


8 posted on 12/14/2008 5:12:09 AM PST by BuffaloJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
N. Korea not a 'nuclear power,' but has nukes: U.S. official

Newsflash: It only takes one nuke to ruin your whole day .. especially if you're at ground zero.

9 posted on 12/14/2008 6:17:17 AM PST by The Sons of Liberty (NO Kenyan Usurpers in the White House - NObama ! WE WILL TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Jet Jaguar; monkapotamus; AmericanInTokyo; All

OH OKAYYYYY about they not yet nuke power


10 posted on 12/14/2008 8:17:06 AM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson