Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Congress and the Obama administration are now putting together an education bill. It would cancel about $9 billion in annual government subsidies for banks that lend to college students and use much of the money to increase financial aid. A small portion of the money would be set aside for promising pilot programs aimed at lifting the number of college graduates
1 posted on 02/18/2010 1:59:08 PM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fight_truth_decay

Yes. This is a solid idea.


2 posted on 02/18/2010 2:00:28 PM PST by furquhart (Would it not be easier to dissolve the people and elect another?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

I can undetstand 1 year early, but 2 years seems out of line to me.


4 posted on 02/18/2010 2:04:39 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Many states already have similar programs, but you don’t graduate early, you actually graduate and get your AA at the same time. College courses count for both high school and college credit. I think the school board covers the tuition of the student (which is A LOT cheaper than what it costs to keep a kid in regular HS for a year.)

http://www.spcollege.edu/central/de/index.htm


6 posted on 02/18/2010 2:06:53 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
High Schools to Offer Plan to Graduate 2 Years Early

LOL!
They are already doing that!

But they call it a High School diploma anyway, graduating equivalent 9th graders.

7 posted on 02/18/2010 2:07:05 PM PST by Publius6961 (You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Excellent plan. If a student can demonstrate the knowledge the system believes is essential, he should be able to get a diploma at any age, and then go to work or college.


9 posted on 02/18/2010 2:08:22 PM PST by Tax-chick (Cheeseburgers, parrots, volcanos, boats, rum, kittens ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay
The fact is, we as a society have been stretching the age of adolescence over the years. In the 18th and 19th centuries it was not uncommon for a fifteen/sixteen year old to go to college if he was prepared academically. Back then we had little concept of "adolescence." We had kids and we had adults. It worked pretty well.

There is a good case to be made that by entertaining people in a suspended state through their late teens as "adolescents" we merely delay their maturation and development.

For some it will remain a reasonable acommodation. But if someone can master the prerequisites, why not have the option to get on with it.

15 posted on 02/18/2010 2:20:57 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Folks, for heaven’s sake give this more thought.

We have kids today who are graduating from high school totally unprepared to continue on to higher education, and you folks think the resolution to this is to cut two grades out from under our high school students.

Why do you think this plan is being lofted? Is it to better the education system by 16.66%, or is it to cut the cost of educating our children by 16.66%?

In effect we’re dropping the age of adulthood by two years. If you graduate from high school when you’re fifteen to sixteen, then how can we claim kids are not adults until 18?

If a kid can graduate at 15, then they’ll be able to go out on their own as kids who graduate high school today do. By sixteen many of these kids will opt to go to work, leave home and get an apartment, like high school graduates do today.

If you think that portends for a better society, you’re not playing with a full deck.


22 posted on 02/18/2010 2:35:00 PM PST by DoughtyOne (God, Family, Friends, Home, Town, State, the U.S., Conservatism, Free Republic & a dollar a day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

how far is it from graduating two years early into charging for graduating later?


24 posted on 02/18/2010 2:41:26 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

My older son would probably have done well testing out at age 15 or 16 and starting college early. While I can’t boast that he was a wiz-kid who started college at age 12, he did start at 18, has maintained good grades, finished at community college and promptly enrolled at UD. He commutes an hour each way (to save money from living on campus), works PT, has helped pay for his car, insurance and personal expenses over the past 6 years. He plans on being a psychologist, working in private practice for awhile and then would like to participate in research and studies some day. He’s right where he should be, for his age and has done tremendously well.

My younger son, well, I’m sure he would have liked to get out of school early but he’s a ‘doer’, not a thinker. To plunge him into college at 16 would have been disasterous, not to mention a waste of money. He’s a smart kid but knows he’s not scholarly and is looking at a career where he can ‘do’ something (electrical work, carpentry, plumbing). He’s more technical and recognizes he won’t do well in an office setting.


50 posted on 02/18/2010 4:03:33 PM PST by ktscarlett66 (Face it girls....I'm older and I have more insurance....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Article in today’s “Bergen Record”. The town over from me. Very well-to-do, bright 8th grade kids. A teacher offered a course in philosophy, at 7:30 in the morning. Eighth graders getting 2 community collge credits in philosophy.


56 posted on 02/18/2010 5:42:45 PM PST by goldi (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

I’ve been saying something like this for several years.

___________________________________________________________________

Here’s my modest proposal for education reform — skip high school altogether.

We have been discussing ways to fast track kids through high school to avoid the liberal agenda and other idiocies:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1315730/posts?page=84#84

Proposal for the Free Republic High School Diploma.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1316882/posts

___________________________________________________________________


64 posted on 02/19/2010 12:52:48 AM PST by Kevmo (So America gets what America deserves - the destruction of its Constitution. ~Leo Donofrio, 6/1/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fight_truth_decay

Stupid idea. Kids need those few years to gather maturity. Sounds like a socialist plan to further the dumbing down of the populace.


65 posted on 02/19/2010 7:46:35 AM PST by Clock King (There's no way to fix D.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson