Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds Oppose California's Bid to Legalize Marijuana
aol ^ | October 15, 2010

Posted on 10/15/2010 2:30:32 PM PDT by george76

Attorney General Eric Holder says the federal government will enforce its marijuana laws in California even if voters next month make the state the first in the nation to legalize the drug.

The Justice Department strongly opposes California's Proposition 19 and remains firmly committed to enforcing the federal Controlled Substances Act in all states, Holder wrote in a letter to former chiefs of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the letter, dated Wednesday.

"We will vigorously enforce the CSA against those individuals and organizations that possess, manufacture or distribute marijuana for recreational use, even if such activities are permitted under state law," Holder wrote.

Under federal law, marijuana is still strictly illegal. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government has the right to enforce its ban regardless of state law.

(Excerpt) Read more at aolnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; ca2010; cainitiatives; california; ericholder; legalizeharddrugs; libertarians; marijuana; medicalmarijuana; prop19; statesrights; tenthamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2010 2:30:33 PM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76
"Attorney General Eric Holder says the federal government will enforce its marijuana laws in California..."

...unless the offender belongs to the New Black Panthers.

2 posted on 10/15/2010 2:33:30 PM PDT by lormand (A Government who robs Peter to pay Paul, will always have the support of Paul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: george76

That’s what he says.


4 posted on 10/15/2010 2:35:33 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (If Obama was the answer---that must have been one stupid question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Feds Oppose California's Bid to Legalize Marijuana

REALLY????


5 posted on 10/15/2010 2:36:09 PM PDT by Vaquero ("an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Awwwww, DUUUUUUUUUUDE!


6 posted on 10/15/2010 2:36:51 PM PDT by TruthHound ("He who does not punish evil commands it to be done." --Leonardo da Vinci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Since when does the Constitution give the Feds the right to tell a state that it can’t legalize anything, if it decides to. We can’t argue against health care reform on a states rights platform, and say that the feds can make something illegal when a state legalizes it.


7 posted on 10/15/2010 2:39:15 PM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76

Given what’s in store for CA, we need to legalize marijuana just so we can get stoned enough to cope with what our pols intend to do to us.


8 posted on 10/15/2010 2:40:31 PM PDT by umgud (Wear your Border Patrol hats to the polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Under federal law, marijuana is still strictly illegal. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the federal government has the right to enforce its ban regardless of state law.

But AZ can't enforce illegal immigrant issues?

9 posted on 10/15/2010 2:43:48 PM PDT by umgud (Wear your Border Patrol hats to the polls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

BANKRUPT CRIMINALS, TALIBAN, CONGRESSCRITTERS, your local DODGECOP wannabees - LEGALIZE ALL DRUGS ! ! ! ! !


10 posted on 10/15/2010 2:44:14 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

It has to do with strict drug enforcement guidelines in Federal contracts within the state of California. Basically...the feds may cancel or limit contracts if the state passes a pot law.


11 posted on 10/15/2010 2:46:32 PM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: halo66

“...the feds may cancel or limit contracts if the state passes a pot law.”

That would be awesome.


12 posted on 10/15/2010 2:49:28 PM PDT by Daveinyork
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I do see the consistency on the part of the Feds. The States be damned no matter what legislation is enacted.
There is no stopping Big Brother.


13 posted on 10/15/2010 2:53:46 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (Sometimes the road less traveled.... is less traveled for a reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

I agree! LOL


14 posted on 10/15/2010 3:00:33 PM PDT by halo66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

Too bad the feds aren’t as committed to enforcing immigration laws.


15 posted on 10/15/2010 3:10:12 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("In politics the middle way is none at all." -- John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

A blatant violation of State’s Rights.

However, the Nanny State Sycophants will be happy.


16 posted on 10/15/2010 3:14:54 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

The federal government has no authority whatsoever to ban or otherwise regulate sales of marijuana within any state. None. If California or any other state wants to legalize or otherwise decriminalize drugs, then the federal government has no authority to intervene if the drugs are produced and consumed within the same state.


17 posted on 10/15/2010 3:21:43 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Since the Feds fail at everything they do except the military, I would not be too worried about it if I lived in California. Since Dept of Justice attorneys are media whores, they will only go for the high profile cases that give them face time with the press.


18 posted on 10/15/2010 3:26:39 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Recreational drugs were criminalized ONLY as a means of grabbing power. Look at the HUNDREDS of laws that allow the federal and state governments to snoop into and control your private affairs all to prevent some loser from smoking a doobie, eating Cheetos, and watching cartoons.


19 posted on 10/15/2010 3:31:56 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76
I think I am actually going to vote yes for this.

it will bring about another state's rights problem for Obama which will help other states for things like immigration, health care, etc?

20 posted on 10/15/2010 3:37:58 PM PDT by Battle Hymn of the Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson