Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John Abraham panics, apparently he and the AGU are forming a “Climate rapid response team”
Watts Up With That? ^ | November 7, 2010 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 11/07/2010 9:24:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

Gosh. A “Climate rapid response team” from Minnesota? What will they be armed with? Wits and a hockey stick? So far that hasn’t worked out too well.  From the Chicago Tribune:

Climate scientists plan campaign against global-warming skeptics

The American Geophysical Union plans to announce Monday that 700 researchers have agreed to speak out on the issue. The effort is a pushback against congressional conservatives who have vowed to kill regulations on greenhouse gas emissions.

Reporting from Washington —

Faced with rising political attacks, hundreds of climate scientists are joining a broad campaign to push back against congressional conservatives who have threatened prominent researchers with investigations and vowed to kill regulations to rein in man-made greenhouse gas emissions.

The still-evolving efforts reveal a shift among climate scientists, many of whom have traditionally stayed out of politics and avoided the news media. Many now say they are willing to go toe-to-toe with their critics, some of whom gained new power after the Republicans won control of the House in last Tuesday’s election.

On Monday, the American Geophysical Union, the country’s largest association of climate scientists, plans to announce that 700 climate scientists have agreed to speak out as experts on questions about global warming and the role of man-made air pollution.

Some are prepared to go before what they consider potentially hostile audiences on conservative talk-radio and television shows.

John Abraham of St. Thomas University in Minnesota, who last May wrote a widely disseminated response to climate-change skeptics, is pulling together a “Climate Rapid Response Team,” which so far has more than three dozen leading scientists to defend the consensus on global warming in the scientific community. Some are also pulling together a handbook on the human causes of climate change, which they plan to start sending to U.S. high schools as early as this fall.

“This group feels strongly that science and politics can’t be divorced and that we need to take bold measures to not only communicate science but also to aggressively engage the denialists and politicians who attack climate science and its scientists,” said Scott Mandia, professor of physical sciences at Suffolk County Community College in New York.

“We are taking the fight to them because we are … tired of taking the hits. The notion that truth will prevail is not working. The truth has been out there for the past two decades, and nothing has changed.”

========================================

Heh, that last sentence pretty well sums it up. Read the whole article here.

I find the phrase “climate rapid response team” a bit of an oxymoron. Given the speed of climate change, did they mean “weather response team”? ;-)

Well it looks like I and many of my associates be traveling more. When these guys come to your town, demand some equal time to present the skeptic side of the story.

h/t to WUWT Reader “Craig” in tips and notes.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 20101108; climatechange; climatescientists; consensus; crrt; globalwarminghoax; highschools; johnabraham; propaganda; scottmandia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

scott mandia

http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=663092

In my opinion the comments below which use the word “arrogant” are sopt-on. Arrogance sums it up. The best way for me to describe my experience with this guy is Woof Woof—what a dog of a person and course of experience. Arrogance—yes—thats it

Avoid if possible. He puts too much time into his website and not enough in teaching the material on it. His tangents can be unbearable. Sometimes it seemed we only had 30 minutes for notes. He made it very difficult to learn, and offered very little help. He just doesn’t seem to care about seeing his students succeed.


21 posted on 11/07/2010 11:29:30 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Just “Cool It” -—

http://www.coolit-themovie.com/videos


22 posted on 11/07/2010 11:57:35 PM PST by CedarDave (Juan Williams to NPR: "You and your far left-wing mob fired me. Wasn't that enough for you? ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Injects some sense into the feel-good environutter schemes.
However, the premise is still wrong.


23 posted on 11/08/2010 12:05:01 AM PST by CedarDave (Juan Williams to NPR: "You and your far left-wing mob fired me. Wasn't that enough for you? ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; scripter; grey_whiskers; proud_yank; markomalley; Dr. Bogus Pachysandra; ...
Thanx Ernest_at_the_Beach !

 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

24 posted on 11/08/2010 1:38:19 AM PST by steelyourfaith (ObamaCare Death Panels: a Final Solution to the looming Social Security crisis ?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

I doubt the 700 headline number completely. These guys are liars of the first degree.

The end of story paragraphs indicate they have 39 “scientists”.

Here “scientist” means a PhD on welfare.


25 posted on 11/08/2010 2:12:00 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

Exactly.

These aren’t neutral scientists in a search for truth, but welfare queens with PhDs.

Gimme da cash...cui bono?


26 posted on 11/08/2010 2:13:04 AM PST by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

John Abraham degrees, BS, MS, PhD - Mechanical Engineering.

I guess there just wasn’t enough money in his field.


27 posted on 11/08/2010 2:13:48 AM PST by oldmomster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They are desperate to get their hands on the last of the Global Warming research grants.


28 posted on 11/08/2010 2:45:33 AM PST by screaminsunshine (Cowabunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

Agreed. I’d also like to know how many of these 700 “scientists” have money invested in the failing carbon trade schemes.


29 posted on 11/08/2010 3:51:17 AM PST by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Faced with rising political factual-argument attacks..."

LOL! Fixed it.

30 posted on 11/08/2010 4:14:24 AM PST by TheOldLady (The only way to run our country is conservatively.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

” 700 researchers have agreed to speak out on the issue. “

That’ll warm up the air.


31 posted on 11/08/2010 4:23:29 AM PST by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

-——hundreds of climate scientists -——

That is code for grant leeches

The proposed action is that of a pimp whose Ho’s are threatened by the new sheriff


32 posted on 11/08/2010 4:26:23 AM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Greetings Jacques. The revolution is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

American Geophysical UNION. They have a union? I guess that’s how you get “consensus.” A flushing sound is coming that even drones will hear.


33 posted on 11/08/2010 4:37:01 AM PST by Avery Iota Kracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Believe it or not, there is one just like that not far from where I live.

He uses it in parades.


34 posted on 11/08/2010 5:00:27 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Love it. The criminals, communists and traitors are publicly naming themselves. There will be consequences for your criminality.


35 posted on 11/08/2010 6:13:19 AM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
How does it go back to the public?!

Through the goobermint, of course, who will exact only moderate "fees" before distributing the balance to "worthy environmental organizations" and public interest groups, as they represent the public.

36 posted on 11/08/2010 9:09:54 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
News reports Misrepresent AGU Climate Q&A Climate Service

"A recent article published by the LA Times and picked up by other media outlets mischaracterized AGU’s forthcoming 2010 Climate Q&A Service as part of “broad campaign” to push back against congressional conservatives.” AGU issued a press release today refuting the inaccuracies in the article. Media inquiries should be directed to Peter Weiss, AGU’s public information manager, at 201-777-7507 or pweiss@agu.org

37 posted on 11/08/2010 11:47:56 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife (Allhttp://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2122429/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson