Posted on 11/07/2010 9:24:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
scott mandia
http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=663092
In my opinion the comments below which use the word “arrogant” are sopt-on. Arrogance sums it up. The best way for me to describe my experience with this guy is Woof Woof—what a dog of a person and course of experience. Arrogance—yes—thats it
Avoid if possible. He puts too much time into his website and not enough in teaching the material on it. His tangents can be unbearable. Sometimes it seemed we only had 30 minutes for notes. He made it very difficult to learn, and offered very little help. He just doesn’t seem to care about seeing his students succeed.
Injects some sense into the feel-good environutter schemes.
However, the premise is still wrong.
I doubt the 700 headline number completely. These guys are liars of the first degree.
The end of story paragraphs indicate they have 39 “scientists”.
Here “scientist” means a PhD on welfare.
Exactly.
These aren’t neutral scientists in a search for truth, but welfare queens with PhDs.
Gimme da cash...cui bono?
John Abraham degrees, BS, MS, PhD - Mechanical Engineering.
I guess there just wasn’t enough money in his field.
They are desperate to get their hands on the last of the Global Warming research grants.
Agreed. I’d also like to know how many of these 700 “scientists” have money invested in the failing carbon trade schemes.
LOL! Fixed it.
” 700 researchers have agreed to speak out on the issue. “
That’ll warm up the air.
-——hundreds of climate scientists -——
That is code for grant leeches
The proposed action is that of a pimp whose Ho’s are threatened by the new sheriff
American Geophysical UNION. They have a union? I guess that’s how you get “consensus.” A flushing sound is coming that even drones will hear.
Believe it or not, there is one just like that not far from where I live.
He uses it in parades.
Love it. The criminals, communists and traitors are publicly naming themselves. There will be consequences for your criminality.
Through the goobermint, of course, who will exact only moderate "fees" before distributing the balance to "worthy environmental organizations" and public interest groups, as they represent the public.
"A recent article published by the LA Times and picked up by other media outlets mischaracterized AGUs forthcoming 2010 Climate Q&A Service as part of broad campaign to push back against congressional conservatives. AGU issued a press release today refuting the inaccuracies in the article. Media inquiries should be directed to Peter Weiss, AGUs public information manager, at 201-777-7507 or pweiss@agu.org
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.