Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Refuses To Dismiss Charges In Baby's Death
http://www.wlky.com/news/28319665/detail.html ^ | 6/22/2011 | WLKY

Posted on 06/22/2011 8:53:38 PM PDT by Morgana

Edited on 06/22/2011 8:55:32 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

INDIANAPOLIS -- A judge has refused to dismiss charges of murder and attempted feticide against an Indianapolis woman accused of killing her premature baby by eating rat poison before giving birth.

Attorneys for 34-year-old Bei Bei Shuai are expected to appeal Tuesday's Marion County court ruling.


(Excerpt) Read more at wlky.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: feticide; mother; prolife; ratpoison

1 posted on 06/22/2011 8:53:41 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Can anyone explain how this ‘late term’ abortion qualifies as murder in the eyes of the law? After all, Libs keep winning the right to kill babies in courts all the time so how is this murder and doctor provided abortion not? Rat poison, salt water...whats the functional difference?


2 posted on 06/22/2011 9:01:14 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Part of what may be going on here, legally speaking, is that Indiana changed their fetal harm laws after an incident a couple of years ago where a bank robber shot a pregnant teller in the stomach (she lost both children).

http://www.archindy.org/criterion/local/2009/05-08/icc.html


3 posted on 06/22/2011 9:11:45 PM PDT by DemforBush (I'm shufflin' through the Texas sand...but my head's in Mississippi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

I understand, it’s just that I find it mindblowing that the law sees the death of a fetus as murder if life ends in any non-natural/non-accidental way... except for abortion.

It’s a complete disconnect and I cannot fathom how they justify it.


4 posted on 06/22/2011 9:22:53 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I think it’s meant to get a test case up to the USSC to catch Roe v. Wade in a logical pincer maneuver it can’t escape from. At this point, all the evidence that a pre-born baby is a human individual, which the Roe court said it had none of, can be brought to bear in order to form a new doctrine.


5 posted on 06/23/2011 2:23:09 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson