Posted on 08/08/2011 10:14:35 PM PDT by Islander7
California attorney Orly Taitz today secured an order from United States District Court Magistrate Judge Richard L. Puglisi demanding representatives of the Hawaii Department of Health appear in federal court Sept. 14 to show why Taitz should be prevented from seeing whatever original 1961 documents the agency has on record regarding Barack Obama's birth.
Taitz returned to federal court in Honolulu today after Hawaii DOH officials presented her with a letter refusing to comply with her subpoena on grounds that Hawaii privacy laws prevented officials from releasing Obama birth records to the public.
"It's ridiculous," Taitz told WND.
She had argued previously – without getting a response from the state – that Obama had waived all privacy rights by releasing his long-form birth certificate to the American public at a White House press conference April 27.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Wrong.
The judge did not issue an order to show cause. In fact, he didn’t issue any order. He set a hearing to consider Orly’s Motion to Compel.
1. One of the litigants, most often Orly, comes up with some hair-brained court submittal whose inevitable failure any competent attorney can predict and explain.
2. It gets hyped and the true believes swallow the latest holy writ hook, line and sinker. The more frisky ones actually find legal text and rulings to cut-and-paste for maximum misunderstanding.
3. Any informed observer who points out that it's all based on a misunderstanding of the law and can't succeed is an O-bot.
4. The case goes down in flames without the slightest hint the court in question regards it as anything but a pointless nuisance.
5. The fact of the hopelessly stupid case going down in flames becomes proof of how massive and sinister the conspiracy is.
6. The true believers clap for Tinkerbelle even harder.
Lather, rinse, and repeat.
Larry Klayman, Bev Harris and Orly Taitz.
Imagine that!!!!
You forgot
2a. The judge, whoever it is, is hailed as a true American patriot who won’t be intimidated and will finally exposed the truth.
Followed by
5a. That same judge is vilified as an Obot traitor and coward.
“We elect 100 US Senators every election cycle”
Uh, no. 33 or 34.
As a matter of fact, I’ll offer you this: as soon as Orly Taitz is successful in ‘getting’ Obama, I will go out back and shoot a crow ... pluck it ... cook it in some fashion ... and eat it. I will post photos of each step. Please ping me as soon as I need to get out the shotgun.
When Taitz encounters yet another roadblock, birthers will immediately include Judge Puglisi in their list of people “gotten to”. It's only a matter of time.
You win the prize.
They prefer to hold off and then try to get the last word in for maximum demoralization value. However, one day truth and justice will prevail. History will once again have to be rewritten by the lefties. You see, they really don't like a loser. All images of Obama will carefully be removed from official lefty record. Everything bad caused by Obama will be blamed on the Tea Party and President George W. Bush. Bill Clinton will once again be remembered as the first black president.
Obama will be largely forgotten until thousands of years later relics and birth and citizenship documents from the boy king's reign will be found buried in a secret chamber beneath what was once Washington DC. But even then the people will marvel mostly about the large mummified ape like creature found with the boy king's ill gotten treasure. Legend says she will curse all who have opened and examined the contents and documents held in the tomb. 3D horror hologram movies will be made about the creature which will terrorize generations of young people.
Yay!
But knowing the budget of the Freeper Republic, it’s really more of a no-prize.
But that’s cool, it’s mine.
Yeah, I know. Typed it first; Posted it second; Thought about it third.
D’oh!
Will Obama leave this country soon with the excuse that the world needs him for a position of "leadership" on a world scale. Will he do this because he is a colossal failure, to leave room for another more popular democrat to run and save face at the same time? Also, because is he possibly the antiChrist and we the flock he leaves?.
Zec 11:17 Woe 1945 to the idol 457 shepherd 7473 that leaveth 5800 the flock 6629! the sword 2719 [shall be] upon his arm 2220, and upon his right 3225 eye 5869: his arm 2220 shall be clean 3001 dried up 3001, and his right 3225 eye 5869 shall be utterly 3543 darkened 3543.
Zec 11:17 Woe to the idol shepherd that leaveth the flock! the sword [shall be] upon his arm, and upon his right eye: his arm shall be clean dried up, and his right eye shall be utterly darkened.
You are right.
True 0 based budget , and obviously Balanced....
___________________________________________________________________________
The Document the state of Hawaii produced was an “abstracted copy” that could have been a summary of any one of a number of documents.
In order to comply with the order to compel, the state of Hawaii would have to produce all of the documents they relied on to produce the abstract.
I suspect that that is part of the issue.
FWIW, an Abstracted Copy, ie “short form birth certificate” is not valid to legally obtain a passport or drivers license.
Documents, what documents? Yes, it is obvious that they had to conjure what was not there. My suspicion is they retrieved data from an application for late filing of a birth that was never acted upon, because of lack of the required documentation. Plus data abstracted from other COLB's of the period. But, I am doubtful that the state of HI actually created the final electronic document that was released to the public. I am still in disbelief that Obozo's techies would release a document that is so clearly fraudulent.
He released it, so now he owns it. It is "his" responsibility if proven fraudulent, he can no longer deny accepting it as fact.
“The judge did not issue an order to show cause.”
I didn’t say he did.
Based on this: “Orly didn’t secure an order from Judge Puglisi. She filed a motion to show cause and to compel production of documents,” it looks to me like the Judge will be considering whether to compel production of documents at the Sept 14th hearing.
“The judge did not issue an order to show cause. In fact, he didn’t issue any order. He set a hearing to consider Orly’s Motion to Compel.”
That’s correct, with one quibble: The two docket entries of 08/08/2011 both direct the plaintiff to provide notice of hearing to other parties. That is a court order. The Court ordered Orly Taitz to notify Loretta Fuddy and all interested parties.
There’s an interesting difference between the two orders to provide notice. The first docket entry orders Taitz, “to provide notice of the hearing to Loretta Fuddy, Health Department, State of Hawaii”. The second orders her, “to provide notice of the hearing to be set to all interested parties”. Courts take a dim view of excluding interested parties.
The hearing is not for the DoH to show cause. The hearing is to consider whether or not to grant Orly's Motion to Compel. There's a significant difference between the two. Neither WND nor Orly understands that, as evidenced by the absurd title Court tells Hawaii officials to explain Obama's birth records. The court didn't tell the DoH to do anything and certainly isn't telling them to explain birth records at the upcoming hearing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.