How does Obama's document stack up against genuine BC?

WND ^ | SEPTEMBER 11, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi

[RobinMasters]

A professional typographer with 50 years experience in the business has confirmed that the typeface in an authentic Hawaii Department of Health long-form birth certificate issued in 1961 is consistent, and concludes the document released by the White House as Barack Obama's 1961 birth certificate – with its typeface anomalies – is anything but genuine.

"From the beginning, when I saw that some of the typed letters on the Obama long-form birth certificate did not match for size or style, I found evidence the document was a forgery," retired New York City typographer Paul Irey told WND. "Still, I wanted to see other birth certificates from the same era and from the same office in the state of Hawaii."

The difficulty with that, however, has been that the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu has refused to answer requests from various researchers, including WND staff, who have requested permission to see authentic birth certificates immediately preceding and immediately succeeding Obama's for comparative analysis.

And as WND has reported, the Hawaii Department of Health has gone so far as to issue regulations making it difficult for people born in Hawaii and their immediate family members to obtain anything but the short-form Certifications of Live Birth, which are computer-generated and contain no original images.

[ml/nj]

Nothing will resolve the controversy until Obama’s original, 50-year-old paper document is made available for examination. A scan is useless.

Oh, please! Do you think we need to wait for the original 50-year-old paper document to pass judgment upon this copy:

ML/NJ

[Brown Deer]

You have no idea what you’re talking about.