Posted on 09/12/2011 8:24:50 AM PDT by RobinMasters
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2777376/posts?page=30#30
are we psoting on TWO threads with the same title?
How does Obama’s document stack up against genuine BC?
World Net Daily ^ | September 11, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 11:33:20 AM by Seizethecarp
How does Obama’s document stack up against genuine BC?
WND ^ | SEPTEMBER 11, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on Tuesday, 13 September 2011 1:24:50 AM by RobinMasters
“Dakkster’s hobby is making up lies about Hussein, and then posting them.”
Could you fill us all in on what lies I’ve posted. Thanks.
Yes, we have duplicate threads on the same article. Fr search feature doesn’t work occasionally.
Every time you write that FMD and Madelyn are the parents of zero, I consider that to be a LIE, because you NEVER provide any source links or research background with which to substantiate your statements.
And such statements, made repeatedly BY YOU on EVERY relative thread are either LIES or propaganda.
Although a file presented as a scan of an original document can never prove the existence of an authentic original, the detection of anomalies in a computer file presented as a "scan" of an old document can demonstrate that said file is not representative of an old original. Just as Buckhead demonstrated that the "Texas Air National Guard Memos" were not copies of actual old typewritten documents.
Internal consistency of such a "scan file" is not sufficient proof of the existence and validity of an old original - but it isnecessary.And by all credible analysis, the "scan" file fails even that test.
I'm talking about the two columns that were supposed to compare the variation between the two sets. You're right that he earlier showed all the letters, which is how I know he's full of BS.
Also, it's funny that "race" is redacted. Another "African" perhaps?
Sounds like you are both racist and full of BS.
You have no idea what you’re talking about.
The characters are all there. Go ahead and prove him wrong. We’ll be anxiously awaiting for you to post the details.
What’s uncannily transparent is noobs who show up on FR insisting on seeing a striking resemblance between Zero and FMD when not only is there no resemblance whatsoever, but if anything, even less than there is with Zero and the Kenyan 0bama.
It’s obvious that some people desperately want people to think that FMD is the bio-dad because then Zero would be a NBC. A liar, but we know that, but a NBC. Or maybe lied to, or whatever backstory they have waiting in the wings.
Well, FMD has a son, and DNA would tell the truth so there’s really no mystery.
It’s laughably stupid to keep insisting that Zero and FMD have any familial resemblance whatsoever. Who are we supposed to believe, you or our lying eyes?
Give me a break.
Inconsistencies that he previously used as evidence for the Obama certificate being a forgery are present in the comparison certificate, even though he claims they're "consistent in size and style."
There are numerous examples, but here are just two:
1. In his original analysis, he posited that the i's in Obama's birth certificate were different, because there was more space between the dot and the letter in some examples. The same thing can be seen in the comparison birth certificate.
2. Also in his original analysis of the Obama certificate, he measured the width of the horizontal lines in letters and said different lengths were impossible using the same typewriter. However, even on the letters he claims are consistent on the comparison birth certificate, there are different widths. For example, the bottom lines of the l's he used on Exhibit 4.
“because you NEVER provide any source links or research background with which to substantiate your statements”
Whose the one lying now?
“Every time you write that FMD and Madelyn are the parents of zero, I consider that to be a LIE,”
All you have to do discredit the ‘FMD & Madeline’ hypothesis is post any evidence/observations to the contrary.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=292717
Perhaps, but he never corrected his earlier story, so I have to assume they're trying to keep their readers believing this, which explains why they would redact the name of the registrar. There's really no other reason to block that out.
Speaking of redacted information, WND really dropped the ball here. The original image of the reverse side they posted had all the text bleeding through, so you could see the birth certificate number, which they blocked out on the other side. When you compare this number to Obama's it's obvious why they blocked it out--despite being born two weeks after Obama, the person's birther certificate has a lower number, defeating one of the main arguments for Obama's being fake.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.