Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No rise in cancer rates after Fukushima disaster - UN
BBC News ^ | 5/31/13 | BBC Staff Writer

Posted on 06/03/2013 8:00:09 AM PDT by kidd

Cancer rates are not expected to rise as a result of the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, UN scientists say.

The evacuation of thousands of people shortly after the accident in 2011 sharply lowered their exposure to radiation, a draft report concluded.

...

The findings of the draft report were presented by the UN Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (Unscear) in the Austrian capital, Vienna.

...

Unscear's report also stated that "no radiation-related deaths have been observed among nearly 25,000 workers involved at the accident site".

(Excerpt) Read more at bbc.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fukushima; fukushimacancer; longtermdisease
There were no deaths from the Fukushima accident. It is projected that there will be no deaths directly attributable to the Fukushima accident.

The loss of property in the vicinity of the plants is a tragedy. But worker safety and evacuation procedures worked.

1 posted on 06/03/2013 8:00:10 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kidd

Yeah....I guess those reports about some of the workers that were working in killer radiation zones were completely false and none of them died....or maybe long-term cancer isn’t what killed them.

It is too early to see the effects imo.


2 posted on 06/03/2013 8:03:15 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

I do not believe it.


3 posted on 06/03/2013 8:05:37 AM PDT by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

“killer radiation zone”

This is loose terminology.
Radworker safety incorporates a combination of dosage, time of exposure and shielding.

I can get a “killer” radiation dose by swallowing certain watch dials. OTOH, I can stand a foot away from a spent fuel rod if I have a foot of lead and leaded glass between, without any ill effects whatsoever.


4 posted on 06/03/2013 8:11:09 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle

And the United Nations is a good friend of nuclear power?


5 posted on 06/03/2013 8:12:06 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I’m thinking about long-term effects as well. Plus we’re looking at more than just cancer; for example, non-cancerous reproductive issues could arise as well.


6 posted on 06/03/2013 8:13:13 AM PDT by goodwithagun (My gun has killed fewer people than Ted Kennedy's car.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kidd
No rise in cancer rates after Fukushima disaster - UN

Kind of soon to tell. These effects usually occur quite a few years after.

7 posted on 06/03/2013 8:14:21 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
It is too early to see the effects imo.

Leukemia and Lymphomas
4 years carcinogenesis onset, 7 years peak

Solid Tumors
14 years carcinogenesis onset, 20 years peak

Yup - Way Too Early

8 posted on 06/03/2013 8:21:17 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kidd; goodwithagun
Early H-bomb tests in the Pacific atolls are good examples of killer radiation zones, as well as Chernobyl and probably some places there in Japan.

My dad, who was a WWII combat vet in the Med, Battle of Rome, Occupation Forces of Germany, and then to Korea etc. was detailed to the US Ivey series of H-bomb explosion tests. I remember early in my life when he finally came back and bringing all kinds of stuff back, among them were a dozen or more thick black plastic circular disks about he size of 5-7 stacked quarters added to his dog tags.

His medical difficulties didn't manifest themselves early, it took years. Had it not been for my mother getting copies of his orders from others in his unit where his name was also present, we could never have proven his medical disabilities were due to this service. The government fought tooth an nail, but the orders clinched it. They finally granted him full 100% disability in the late 60s. He died in 1971 age 57 while I was overseas. Frankly, I think we all know we aren't talking about watch dials and spent rods here.

9 posted on 06/03/2013 8:22:29 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kidd
Japan refused to release the SPEEDI fallout data they had when it was needed most. A large amount of fallout was distributed and concentrated into the valley north west of Fukushima. Entire towns ended up being evacuated to areas that had more fallout then the town they were in. The fact that the Japanese government failed to release the SPEEDI data when it was needed is proof their plans failed miserably.

And Fukushima is far from over. They are running out of storage tanks and have been asking for permission to dump the radiated water straight into the ocean. They are also contemplating freezing the ground to prevent water from the water table from flowing into the site. They have no idea how to do that and have been asking for help. And they still have to inject water into the core shells to prevent additional explosions.

An no you wont see any deaths related to Fukushima being reported because their corrupt government has put a lid on the situation.

10 posted on 06/03/2013 9:04:17 AM PDT by justa-hairyape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

One of the reasons of cancer is because the thyroid swells up and high metabolism cancer cells benefit from this “sexual” like spliting of the cells at a high rate. Drop the thyroid a notch or remove it, I believe, goes a long way to avoid cancer, maybe not slow tumor growths, but cancer most likely. It’s why hair falls when under chemo because chemo affects high metabolic hair cells.


11 posted on 06/03/2013 9:39:39 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

Horse crap


12 posted on 06/03/2013 10:36:24 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

I think there were two or three workers who perished as a result of mechanical hazards at the plant in the ensuing mess. Not radiation related, but things like falls from heights, being crushed, etc.

The worst accident of a reactor in the world, Chernobyl, has wildlife that is flourishing in the area. Where are the three-headed deer I was promised that would result? I want one of those puppies for my wall of mounts.


13 posted on 06/03/2013 12:32:13 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

They lie so boldly now. You have to be so Stupid to believe this since it flies in the face of past experience and known scientific, and medical fact.


14 posted on 06/03/2013 3:19:13 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NVDave

And how many people died as a result of Chernobyl. But wait! We have magic. Not one civilian is going to die because of Fukushima. Even though it is worse in some ways.

Anyone who puts forth information like that does not deserve to be heard.


15 posted on 06/03/2013 3:22:08 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Revel

You really dont have any idea of what you are talking about


16 posted on 06/03/2013 4:04:42 PM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Revel

The majority of victims at Chernobyl died of massive acute exposure to radiation at levels not seen outside the containment at Fukushima.

The levels of radiation that have escaped outside the containment at Fukushima are at levels we’ve already seen from above-ground weapons testing fallout. If the henny-pennies were at all accurate in their predictions of what comes about from radiation exposure and how long it affects the environment, I’d already be dead because I lived for more than a decade in central Nevada, and more to the point, farmed there, which involved ingesting large amounts of dust stirred from the ground in tillage operations.

So you see why I’m a skeptic of these projections.


17 posted on 06/03/2013 5:20:19 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson