Posted on 10/18/2013 8:45:45 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
That sounds like a good thing to me. Let the lefties doubledown on a policy that began with overwhelming opposition, started its implementation as a laughing stock epic fail then proceeded to sink like a ship built with chicken wire for a hull.
Like hiring second rate foreign contractors!?!
lol
now that is insane
Hmmm.
There are competent data base people in the big agencies of the Government ...wonder if they talked to any of them.
Take heart. It will still be royally screwed up even with a single payer system.
It was on here a couple days ago. They spent millions, then ripped off other websites and software to cobble together something whose component parts could not handle traffic.
That fits the aforementioned conspiracy theory.
I don’t think they’ll get a single-payer system made law for a decade or two after this but it would be easier to Clowar & Piven than the current fluster cluck. Put all those eggs in one basket and see what happens.
I have said for nearly a year....O’care will not be implemented...it simply will fail....JMHO....and hoping I am correct!!!
YEP...the “website”...I believe...was so monstrous...because they want to MONITOR/CONTROL OUR EVERY MOVE...
Billions will be spent over the next years to NOT get it working. It’s the next Solyndra — a money laundering operation. Thanks Ernest.
**********************************EXCERPT***********************************************
Officials feared that if they called on outsiders to help with the technical details of how to run a commerce website, those companies could be subpoenaed by Hill Republicans, the former aide said. So the task fell to trusted campaign tech experts.
What does this even mean? Congress can’t subpoena “trusted campaign tech experts”? What law/rule is that?
cptacek on October 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM
Interesting. Very well put. I had not thought of it exactly that way but you are certainly correct.
*********************************EXCERPT*******************************************
cptacek on October 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM
Which is why they only hired “trusted campaign tech experts” instead of people who actually knew what they were doing.
txhsmom on October 18, 2013 at 11:15 AM
***********************************EXCERPT**************************************
What does this even mean? Congress can’t subpoena “trusted campaign tech experts”? What law/rule is that?
cptacek on October 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM
They can subpoena them, but presumably, they will be more willing to lie to congress, and even if they’re unwilling to technically commit perjury for their masters, they would still be much more inclined to filibuster and give evasive and deceptive answers, and be willing to embarrass themselves to protect the administration. Outside contractors would have much more incentive to be candid, and not just to the minimum extent required by law.
RINO in Name Only on October 18, 2013 at 11:23 AM
Ok... then what?
Your evalution is correct.
WHAT AN INCREDIBLE LOSER!!!!
LMFSWCAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Only a Democrat could be so disingenuous as to pretend that this rumpclown is anything but a massive failure, and only another "bruvvah" could be so dim a racist bulb as to not be supremely disappointed in this greasey faggot of an asshat.
IMHO.
8^D
I just read today that this same company has approximately five contracts with the US govt.!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.