Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood Plays Around With Virginity
Townhall.com ^ | August 2, 2014 | Brent Bozell

Posted on 08/02/2014 4:45:29 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: miss marmelstein; wagglebee

Y’all handled an obnoxiously assuming and pretentious poster quite well. Kudos.


61 posted on 08/04/2014 7:04:04 AM PDT by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Genesis 4 is first mention of sex.


62 posted on 08/04/2014 7:05:27 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
I would opine that the last two verses of Genesis 2 implies a sexual relationship.
63 posted on 08/04/2014 7:16:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“I would opine that the last two verses of Genesis 2 implies a sexual relationship”

If that is true then it was not fruitful and was just for pleasure.


64 posted on 08/04/2014 7:28:05 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
If that is true then it was not fruitful and was just for pleasure.

Why? Not all sex results in conception, in fact not conceiving is the norm.

65 posted on 08/04/2014 7:31:11 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“Why? Not all sex results in conception, in fact not conceiving is the norm. “

So God’s plan is that most sex is not for conceiving?


66 posted on 08/04/2014 7:34:36 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; narses; miss marmelstein; Kaslin; Mrs. Don-o; Morgana; Responsibility2nd; P-Marlowe; ...
So God’s plan is that most sex is not for conceiving?

What exactly are you getting at here? Why don't you just quit dancing around the issue and spit it out.

I mentioned that the last few verses of Genesis 2 certainly allude to sex and you seem to disagree.

I also pointed out the FACT that most instances of intercourse DO NOT result in conception. One would typically presume that this must be God's intent; but I have a feeling that your agenda is a little different, so please explain.

67 posted on 08/04/2014 7:44:15 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“I also pointed out the FACT that most instances of intercourse DO NOT result in conception. One would typically presume that this must be God’s intent;”

Sounds like you agree with me.


68 posted on 08/04/2014 7:46:18 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; narses; miss marmelstein; Kaslin; Mrs. Don-o; Morgana; Responsibility2nd; P-Marlowe; ...
Sounds like you agree with me.

I haven't even figured out your angle yet. Why are you so evasive?

69 posted on 08/04/2014 7:51:28 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Do we have a tag-team here, or just two nitwits?


70 posted on 08/04/2014 7:54:41 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Good question. If I had to guess it would be a tag team composed of two nitwits.
71 posted on 08/04/2014 7:57:35 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

LOL! And I’d have to agree.


72 posted on 08/04/2014 7:58:48 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Nothing in Scripture suggests that sexual relations started only after the Fall. . The sexual union of Adam and Eve would have been in the context of Orignal Blessing in the Garden of Delight (Eden.)

We don't know the exact timing, but it's plausible they got into this wonderful sexual discovery of each other just minutes after their creation!

73 posted on 08/04/2014 7:59:47 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When the heart is pure, it can't help loving, because it has found the source of love, which is God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“Nothing in Scripture suggests that sexual relations started only after the Fall.”

Genesis 3:16

“I will make your pains in childbearing very severe;
with painful labor you will give birth to children.
Your desire will be for your husband


74 posted on 08/04/2014 8:03:10 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; wagglebee
"So God’s plan is that most sex is not for conceiving?"

TexasGator, God's plan is that fertility is time-limited and periodic. If you conduct yourself as commanded in the Books of Moses, you'll abstain from Day 1 of the wife's menstrual cycle until 7 days after the last show of blood --- therefore about 12-13 days every month --- which sees you resuming marital relations just a day or two before ovulation, in a typical cycle. This also happens to be when the male finds the female most compellingly attractice, and female pleasure doo-dads are most receptive, woo-woo. Therefore Torah-based intercourse is optimally timed for making the Song of Songs really sing (!) and for conception.

Natural Family Planning -- observing and honoring the fertility signs, and regulating your behavior accordingly --- can be used either for avoiding or achieving conception. Thank God for this excellent design.

On the other hand, even intercourse when no conception is possible, is still related to the reproductive purpose of marriage, in that it can establish-maintain-strengthen a basic pleasure bond between husband and wife. Thus it tends to keep the pair together, which eliminates promiscuity, which eliminates the transmission of devastating sexually-transmitted diseases, which stabilizes the wider community overall, which is necessary for the durability of the family unit, which is essential to the proper raising of children.

So you've got pleasure at the service of both procreation and lasting couple satisfaction.

To which I say: Yay.

75 posted on 08/04/2014 8:17:48 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When the heart is pure, it can't help loving, because it has found the source of love, which is God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Gen 3:16 is the beginning of pains and difficulties in childbearing, and plausibly the beginning of difficulties in the sexual relationship in general, i.e. a woman desiring a husband though he dominates her--- "lords it over her" --- to finish out that verse.

Not the beginning of sexual relations per se.

It's defensible to speculate, as I do, that both the man-woman relationship and childbirth would have been, or were intended to be, before the Fall, simply ecstatic.

76 posted on 08/04/2014 8:24:31 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When the heart is pure, it can't help loving, because it has found the source of love, which is God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

“It’s defensible to speculate”

I am not going to get into speculation ...


77 posted on 08/04/2014 8:27:55 AM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
Ha Ha!

Thank you-- that woke me right up. Now for the coffee...

78 posted on 08/04/2014 8:58:54 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (When the heart is pure, it can't help loving, because it has found the source of love, which is God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; Mrs. Don-o

Actually, those verses don’t support that sex happened after the fall.

God said that the man and woman would be one flesh, and that happens in sex.

There’s simply no reason to believe that they didn’t have it until after the fall.

All that really does is contribute to the concept that sex is wrong somehow, that it’s not pleasing to God, who created it in the first place.

And if sex is just for procreation, He could have very well had women go into heat. If He didn’t mean for husband and wife to enjoy it, He wouldn’t have given them the desire for it that far outstrips a woman’s ability to conceive, even with the increased conception that was part of the result of the fall.


79 posted on 08/04/2014 9:02:40 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Sex also emotionally bonds men and women, more so with women it seems, but it strengthens the marriage when experienced regularly.


80 posted on 08/04/2014 9:05:09 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson