Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Would Scalia Say?: No reason Obama shouldn't appoint
The Shinbone: The Frontier of the Free Press ^ | February 14, 2016 | Daniel Clark

Posted on 02/14/2016 7:18:44 PM PST by Daniel Clark

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Tupelo
The Senate is not required to do anything.

If they refuse to act on the nominee, nobody's going to stop them. (said with a nod to Yogi)

41 posted on 02/14/2016 8:11:15 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Yes, we will...


42 posted on 02/14/2016 8:21:48 PM PST by GOPJ (Hillary has 416 'superdelegates'... Bernie has 14... Wake up democrats - the election's rigged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

Obama could appoint Triumph the Insult Comic Dog, but the Senate should As Trump said, “Delay, Delay, Delay!”


43 posted on 02/14/2016 8:22:03 PM PST by BigEdLB (Take it Easy, Chuck. I'm Not Taking it Back -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo

S.RES. 334. EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT THE PRES. SHOULD NOT MAKE RECESS APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT, EXCEPT TO PREVENT OR END A BREAKDOWN IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT’S BUSINESS. KEATING MOTION TO RECOMMIT TO JUDICARY COMM.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/86-1960/s415


44 posted on 02/14/2016 8:37:19 PM PST by GOPJ (Hillary has 416 'superdelegates'... Bernie has 14... Wake up democrats - the election's rigged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

S.RES. 334. EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT THE PRES. SHOULD NOT MAKE RECESS APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT, EXCEPT TO PREVENT OR END A BREAKDOWN IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT’S BUSINESS. KEATING MOTION TO RECOMMIT TO JUDICARY COMM.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/86-1960/s415

It was dems who did this... all we have to do is delay delay delay...


45 posted on 02/14/2016 8:39:38 PM PST by GOPJ (Hillary has 416 'superdelegates'... Bernie has 14... Wake up democrats - the election's rigged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

S.RES. 334. EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT THE PRES. SHOULD NOT MAKE RECESS APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT, EXCEPT TO PREVENT OR END A BREAKDOWN IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT’S BUSINESS. KEATING MOTION TO RECOMMIT TO JUDICARY COMM.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/86-1960/s415

Precedents matter...


46 posted on 02/14/2016 8:41:37 PM PST by GOPJ (Hillary has 416 'superdelegates'... Bernie has 14... Wake up democrats - the election's rigged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark
From the article: "Elections have consequences."

Don't we know it! Every Republican Senator was elected to office and should obey his oath of office by rejecting anti-Consitutionalists every time one is nominated.

47 posted on 02/14/2016 9:12:35 PM PST by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

Hey Daniel, Alabama won again.


48 posted on 02/14/2016 9:26:23 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark
Here's what Obama has said: No obligation to appoint.

Obama Senate Supreme Court Nominees

”As we all know, there's been a lot of discussion in the country about how the Senate should approach this confirmation process.

I disagree with this view.

I believe firmly that the Constitution calls for the Senate to advise and consent.’

http://obamaspeeches.com/046-Confirmation-of-Judge-Samuel-Alito-Jr-Obama-Speech.htm

49 posted on 02/14/2016 9:43:37 PM PST by NoLibZone (I voted for Mitt. The lesser of 2 evils religious argument put a black Muzzi nationalist in the W.H.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

If the Donald wins the nomination and if he wins the election which I doubt he will nominate his sister Judge Maryanne Trump Barry for the Supreme Court!! Blood is thicker than water and he doesn’t have any core principles..


50 posted on 02/14/2016 9:49:10 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

“”Elections have consequences.” President Obama once said that, and yet it’s true. One might have hoped we’d all have learned it by now.”

Cry me a river. The elections for US Senate have consequences too.


51 posted on 02/14/2016 10:09:58 PM PST by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

Does the President appoint or simple recommend?


52 posted on 02/15/2016 3:35:06 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

The Democrats have made a cottage industry of forcing Republican presidents to nominate liberal judges when they were in power. This whole discussion is a mute point. The president has to nominate a candidate that the Senate will confirm....period!!!


53 posted on 02/15/2016 3:55:27 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Clark

They need to be stopped from filling the seat, HOW it’s done doesn’t much matter to me.


54 posted on 02/15/2016 4:06:52 AM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tupelo
They did it twice to Richard Nixon!!!!They did it to Robert Bork. It's how we got David Souter and Ginsburg. The dems are doing what they always do...change the rules to suit there agenda.
55 posted on 02/15/2016 4:09:49 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: R. Scott

He nominates and the senate either accepts or rejects!!!


56 posted on 02/15/2016 4:10:45 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Redwood71
The choice will never make it out of the house.

It's the Senate...the house has no constitutional role to play!!!

57 posted on 02/15/2016 4:12:44 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

How much weight should we give to a 55-year old “sense of the Senate” resolution?


58 posted on 02/15/2016 4:14:39 AM PST by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

S.RES. 334. EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE SENATE THAT THE PRES. SHOULD NOT MAKE RECESS APPOINTMENTS TO THE SUPREME COURT, EXCEPT TO PREVENT OR END A BREAKDOWN IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE COURT’S BUSINESS. KEATING MOTION TO RECOMMIT TO JUDICARY COMM.

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/86-1960/s415


59 posted on 02/15/2016 8:50:50 AM PST by GOPJ (Hillary has 416 'superdelegates'... Bernie has 14... Wake up democrats - the election's rigged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy

The Constitution is 226 years old ...

Kanye West’s clothing business is only a few years old.. (even if he is $53 million in debt)

Which has ‘more weight’?


60 posted on 02/15/2016 8:53:59 AM PST by GOPJ (Hillary has 416 'superdelegates'... Bernie has 14... Wake up democrats - the election's rigged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson