Posted on 04/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by drewh
Ted Cruz breathes a huge sigh of relief, for now. Sibley has another plan.
Chief Justixe Roberts made his decision late yesterday:
Sibley's application was directed to Chief Justice John Roberts, the justice assigned to emergency appeals from the Washington, D.C. area. Roberts denied it without seeking a response from any other party, a sign of how little merit Roberts found in the application.
Undeterrred, Sibley writes on his blog that he will now appeal to Clarence Thomas:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to be relieved from the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing any of the D.C. Madam Jeane Palfrey's Escort Service Records.
Before I simply release the records in my possession, I must exhaust all judicial remedies. Accordingly, invoking Supreme Court Rule 22.4, I am renewing the Application with a second Justice, the estimable Clarence Thomas. I will wait to see what he says before taking my next step.
Anyway, it’s not like Sibley’s gonna let a little thing like the law get in his way, especially since he’s already lost his license to practice. He's biding his time to see what Clarence Thomas thinks (let's hope his name isn't implicated), before releasing the names himself. That's the end game here. Also, Mr. Sibley would like us to focus on Judge Garland.
Below is Sibley's complete response to CLG.
***
By Montgomery Blair Sibley
As you asked me to keep you in the loop, here is the latest on the D.C. Madam's records:
Yesterday, Chief Justice Roberts denied my Application to remove the Restraining Order which prohibits me from releasing the D.C. Madam's Escort Service Records I believe relevant to the Presidential Election. Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 22, I am now renewing that Application to Justice Thomas - a procedural second bite at the apple so to speak. I will wait upon his decision - which in the normal course should come by the middle of next week - beforetaking any further action regarding those Records. The Renewed Application can be found on my blog.
I have reviewed the putative D.C. Madam records released on-line and can state they are not the Records I seek to release. Instead, they appear to be those that I released publicly in 2007... [See also: CLG's 'DC Madam' Phone Records posted September 2007.]
Respectfully, I have sought to answer all your questions, so now I am going to ask you a few of my own: With the Wisconsin Primary now in the books and more primaries on the horizon:
1. Will the Press begin to "press" Chief Justice Roberts as to why he denied my Application in Supreme Court Case No. 15A1016? Is he a Caesar at the Coliseum turning his thumb up or down as the whim strikes him or does he have to account-through-legal-analysis for his decision to allow my First Amendment Political Speech to be muzzled by explicitly approving the refusal of the lower courts in his administrative jurisdiction to allow me to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order? (I trust you know for time sensitive or urgent questions, reporters can contact the Supreme Court Public Information Office at 202-479-3211, press 1.)
2. When will the Press begin to "press" D.C. Circuit Court Chief Judge Garland as to why his Court has refused – since March 9, 2016 – to address my Petition which seeks an order directing the District Court Clerk to file my Motion to Modify the Restraining Order. Notably, in Case No.: 16-3007, I requested Expedited Consideration which the Circuit Court also has refused to grant or deny creating in effect a judicial pocket veto without explanation and thus denying me the ability to appeal such a decision. (Such an inquiry can be directed to: Tracy Hauser Scarrow, (202-216-7460) Special Assistant to Chief Judge Garland.)
Background reading:
BAD NEWS FOR LYIN' TED: Supreme Court Adds DC Madam Case To Official Docket
True. He seems serious to me and a good Catholic. He won’t like cheaters.
Hey Obama, when are you going to release all those papers?
Oh! Wrong thread.
This is Ted.
Yea Ted. Hide all those papers!
Like ZZ Top says: The Women Go Crazy for a Sharp Dressed Man
remember this word..... “sandbagging”....
no real dirt on Cruz will be allowed until he’s done what he being used for...which is to take out Trump
There sandbagging anything on Cruz till the time that they needed take to need to take him out
“Trump is on the list. Prove me wrong.”
Unlike your butt ugly candidate, Trump doesn’t need Prostitutes.
Welcome back. Fight goes on. It’ll end some day.
Have you read Clarence Thomas’s autobiography, “My Grandfather’s Son”?
I enjoyed it very much.
Actually, I would love nothing more than for that detestable fraud Ted Cruz to go down in flames. His phony religious preacher act is like nails on a chalkboard. Would like nothing better than to see his holier than thou persona relegated to eternal ridicule in the annals of American politics. Right there with Gary Hart and Bob Livingston.
2005,5:23,PM,ALEXANDRIA,VA,703,303-8525
1/1/2005,4:44,PM,COLUMBIA,MD,410,884-3636
1/1/2005,5:41,PM,WESTMINSTR,MD,443,340-3134
1/2/2005,3:07,PM,ALEXANDRIA,VA,703,303-8525
1/2/2005,3:12,PM,SILVERSPG,MD,301,980-1403
1/2/2005,3:09,PM,WASHINGTON,DC,770,617-9966
1/2/2005,2:31,PM,WESTMINSTR,MD,443,340-3134
1/3/2005,7:47,PM,FLSCHURCH,VA,571,251-1419
1/3/2005,4:44,PM,SILVERSPG,MD,301,980-1403
1/3/2005,7:47,PM,SILVERSPG,MD,301,980-1403
1/3/2005,8:07,PM,SILVERSPG,MD,301,980-1403
1/3/2005,2:02,PM,WASHINGTON,DC,202,258-7248
1/3/2005,2:08,PM,WASHINGTON,DC,202,258-7248
1/3/2005,2:26,PM,WASHINGTON,DC,202,258-7248
1/3/2005,2:55,PM,WASHINGTON,DC,202,258-7248
1/3/2005,3:01,PM,WASHINGTON,DC,202,258-7248
1/4/2005,3:34,PM,ALEXANDRIA,VA,703,303-8525
1/4/2005,3:59,PM,ALEXANDRIA,VA,703,303-8525
1/4/2005,2:14,PM,BALTIMORE,MD,410,303-8146
1/4/2005,9:22,AM,BISHOPRNCH,CA,925,786-0235
1/4/2005,6:09,PM,FAIRFLSSUN,CA,707,631-4945
when i was a kid, you could look up phone numbers in the pulibc phone library directory... :)
“Donald Trump has made no secret about his many affairs. I would be a surprised though, given his evident success with so many beautiful women, that he was also paying for call girls. If he has done so, I don’t think think he would deny it if he was asked about it.”
That is rich coming from the Cruzilla crowd. Wouldn't your guy? Oh wait, Trump is violent. Cory is violent, even if he isn't, but he should just apologize when he is slimed by lunatics believing in fairy dust.
By all means. Let's conduct this on the merits, but it takes two to tango. And your guy has decided to engage in congress with rats of the GoPee variety.
Most seem to be FL.
You used to do it online but they want you to pay.
Hate on Trump for many things, but having a lot of lovers is something he BRAGS about.
He's never held himself up to be a paragon of virtue in this realm.
That's why it's a big deal when a pious republican gets caught.
Or a democrat who prosecutes people using prostitutes gets caught doing the same thing, like Spitzer.
On July 9, 2007, Palfrey released the supposed entirety of her phone records for public viewing and downloading on the Internet in TIFF format, though days prior to this, her civil attorney Montgomery Blair Sibley had dispatched 54 CD-ROM copies to researchers, activists, and journalists. Senator David Vitter (R-LA) acknowledged on the night of July 9 that he had been a customer of her escort service.[15]
So the phone list was released in 2007 that resulted in one (R) senator being named. Now the debarred lawyer suddenly has another list he wants to release (sell).
I am amazed that anyone would fall for this - AGAIN.
one senator is enough in this case..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.