Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Rejects DC Madam Case (appeal to Justice Thomas filed)
The Daily Bail ^ | 2 hours ago

Posted on 04/06/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by drewh

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: drewh
Awww, another unsubstantiated sleaze thread about Cruz, from people who support a self professed adulterer. How nice.......

Please keep it up........because it will do nothing but continue to destroy Trump's standing with Americans.

41 posted on 04/06/2016 6:45:44 PM PDT by TXSearcher (The anti-RINO rebellion is being won by a NY RINO.......truth IS stranger than fiction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

I don’t think Roberts’ issue is about girls. He is friends with Cruz, though.


42 posted on 04/06/2016 6:51:00 PM PDT by Defiant (The Shills are alive, with the sound of Cruz-ick....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: drewh

I doubt it was Cruz... for one thing the lawyer is a liberal hater - and liberals don’t hate Cruz.


43 posted on 04/06/2016 6:54:50 PM PDT by GOPJ ("Should a Jewish baker be forced to bake a cake for a Nazi wedding?" John Stossel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Thomas won’t help. It was a court order to protect information that was irrelevant to a criminal prosecution. The client who owned the information, the DC madam, later fired this attorney. It was her information, not his, and she did not want to release it, probably to protect her security. Fat lot of good that did her, but there is no basis for the former attorney to release confidential information given to him by someone who is no longer his client and did not ask for it to be released. It’s like a sealed court file in which the parties to the court action are not asking for it to be unsealed.


44 posted on 04/06/2016 6:55:40 PM PDT by Defiant (The Shills are alive, with the sound of Cruz-ick....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kik5150

Trump doesn’t need that list.

He has his own list.

Why do you think he was the official sponsor of beauty pageants? Casting couches for the trumpers.

For the life of me, I cannot fathom why trumpers love this pathetic attempt to try to pin some sex scandal on Ted Cruz.

First of all... they can’t.

Second, their candidate ...The Trump ...is the father of all sex scandals.


45 posted on 04/06/2016 6:56:58 PM PDT by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: erkelly

Donald Trump paid for all his beautiful women.

If they weren’t literally paid for, as in call girls, they were paid for in a somewhat more subtle way.

Does anyone really believe that old combover could have gotten any of those beautiful women if he was working in appliances at Home Depot.

He bought them all.

And they meant a lot to him. Not as people, or as friends or companions or even lovers but as status symbols.

Old Donald had to validate his manhood by having the hottest women to shore up his low self-esteem.

When one is a combination of low-self esteem and narcissism, it takes a lot of time and money to keep up.


46 posted on 04/06/2016 7:01:49 PM PDT by altura (Cruz for our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Is there a reason why anyone would trust the names in a pimp’s book?


47 posted on 04/06/2016 7:41:51 PM PDT by escapefromboston (manny ortez: mvp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh
BAD NEWS FOR TED: Supreme Court Adds DC Madam Case To Official Docket

How is that bad news for Ted Cruz?

48 posted on 04/06/2016 7:48:26 PM PDT by Hoodat (Article 4, Section 4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Maybe someone can “steal” them and release them. We need to see


49 posted on 04/06/2016 7:58:15 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manc

What this nonsense article fails to mention is that the so-called DC Madam died in 2008, and all records precede her death.

Ted Cruz was elected to the US Senate in 2012 and didn’t move to DC until Jan 2013.

Nothingburger.


50 posted on 04/06/2016 8:11:51 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoodat

Trump’s supporters are so naive - if told them that Cruz had murdered his mother and buried her on the Washington mall, they’d all be out there with shovels the next day.


51 posted on 04/06/2016 8:14:08 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: drewh

Uh the files were already leaked online and Cruz’s number wasn’t on there. So it has to be someone else.


52 posted on 04/06/2016 8:23:04 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

DoughtyOne do you know why this guy lost his law license??? Was it possibly taken by someone on the list???


53 posted on 04/06/2016 8:30:39 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kit cat

I don’t Kit Cat, but it doesn’t seem like an idea that is out of the question.

There may have been decent cause, I just don’t know anything about him.


54 posted on 04/06/2016 8:34:48 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: heights

Wait a minute.

Trump is one ugly scoundrel. Having a Beautiful wife doesn’t mean he’s hot, it means he’s wealthy.


55 posted on 04/06/2016 8:43:41 PM PDT by DrewsMum (If they wanted a conservative, they'd vote for one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
I believe it is a different list they are asking to be released. Here is 3 videos from Youtube that can get Freepers up to speed.

Still Report #753 - Ted Cruz May Be in DC Madam's Black Book

Still Report #757 - DC Madam's Files Will Be Released

Still Report #765 - Website Warns Cruz on DC Madam's Records

56 posted on 04/06/2016 9:11:30 PM PDT by Conservative Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Elpasser

“the so-called DC Madam died in 2008, and all records precede her death. Ted Cruz was elected to the US Senate in 2012 and didn’t move to DC until Jan 2013.”

Not really a nothing burger. Cruz was in DC from 1995 to 2002 in various capacities. Heidi was there until 2004 and he made plenty of trips. And after he moved to Texas to be solicitor general, he argued in front of the Supreme Court 9 times. The Supreme Court is located in DC.

You want cheese on that nothingburger?


57 posted on 04/06/2016 9:33:31 PM PDT by DesertRhino ("I want those feeble minded asses overthrown,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mak5
Sibley has been promising to release names since 2007... He’s a loon.
Kinda reminds me of William Kunstler. They talk a good game, but they're crappy lawyers. Regardless of the veracity of his claims, he'd be the LAST shyster I'd want to represent me for so much as a parking ticket, even if he paid me.
58 posted on 04/06/2016 11:08:29 PM PDT by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator; All

Then again, why did he pick Thomas (because Thomas had that pubic hair on the soda can issue? Or because as a Republican he would not want Republican names out there and it is a stall.) I would think that one of the liberal justices would be more likely to favor release, or not?


59 posted on 04/07/2016 12:31:20 AM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mak5

but he’s the Trumpeteers loon.


60 posted on 04/07/2016 12:59:47 AM PDT by wiggen (#JeSuisCharlie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson