I think it is unlikely that an indictment can be issued based on the leaked emails because the chain of custody has been broken. However, the information in the emails could potentially be used to develop a case and seek an indictment. As the defending attorney I might argue that we don’t know if the official government was the source of the leaks from which the case was developed and therefore the case is the fruit from a poisoned tree and can’t be used. If an official policing agency illegally obtained the emails and then laundered them through Wiki anything developed from them can’t be used.
<><>ITEM---U.S. sources indicate that the extensive DOJ probe was more focused on the possibility that Hillary's private server was used to protect messaging in which Secy Clinton allegedly discussed quid pro quo transactions with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.There is an abundance of evidence to prove that she did this.
REALITY CHECK--A provision in the Export Administration Regulations (EAR) is intended to prevent the govt from co-opting United States citizens and companies ..... EAR proscribes using US citizens as instrumentalities to advance a foreign government's foreign policy.
This clearly describe Hillary's activities at the State Dept. As a tax-paid govt employee, Hillary assiduously used her tax-paid office for purely personal/political reasons.......involving the interests of foreign countries.......particularly foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation.
CONCLUSION--The Export Administration Regulations (EAR) apply to all "U.S. persons" (defined to include individuals and companies located in the United States and their foreign affiliates).
The provisions are intended to prevent United States citizens and companies being used as instrumentalities of a foreign government's foreign policy.
Offending persons are subject to the EAR law when their activities relate to the sale, purchase, or transfer of goods or services (including the sale of information) within the United States or between the United States and a foreign country.
This covers exports and imports, financing, forwarding and shipping, and certain other transactions that may take place wholly offshore.....and/or across the borders with private donors to the Clinton Foundation in exchange for influence on U.S. policy.
<><>ITEM---The latest is the involvement of state AG's in the C/F investigations....earlier, Wall Street whistleblower Charles Ortel found irregularities of a sufficient magnitude that the Clinton Foundation should be shut down.
Ortel: if any of the 50 state attorneys general present the evidence to a federal district judge, an injunction would be ordered, shutting down the Clinton Foundation and placing the organization in receivership.
<><> ITEM----The buzz is the C/F got IRS' okay to raise funds for the Arkansas Clinton Library....not as a global "do-good." Certainly not approved as a global money-raking Lobbying Firm.
=======================================================
<><> ITEM---Wall Street whistleblower Charles Ortel quoted a former managing director of Dillon, Read & Co thusly: "under New York law, tax authorities dont have to show criminal intent to get convictions against foundation officials."
" Authorities need only show that the Clinton Foundation filed materially misleading financial information but kept on fundraising for a myriad of do-good projects."
<><> ITEM---The criminal element's MO to hide larger crimes is to falsify official documents. =========================================
<><> ITEM----The legal culpability of a tax-free "charity" consists of:
<><> soliciting and taking money, and,
<><> showing how they spend it.
REPORT MAIL FRAUD AND ELECTRONIC FRAUD HERE:
MAIL FRAUD https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
ELECTRONIC FRAUD---FBI electronic fraud unit