Clintons Shutter Global Initiative as Donations Dry Up

The New American ^ | 16 January 2017 | Bob Adelmann

[VitacoreVision]

The Clinton Global Initiative announced that, effective April 15, 2017, it would be closing its doors and laying off 22 employees. by Bob Adelmann

[A_Former_Democrat]

Gee . . .I WONDER WHY?

But had the election gone the other way, this would be “legitimate” Presidency, right John Lewis et al?

[Lurkinanloomin]

No more influence to sell so donations dried up.

It was never a charity.

It was a money laundering scheme.

[wastedyears]

[Uncle Miltie]

Why pay to not play?

[Bob]

When any business runs out of its primary product (i.e. influence) and has little to no chance of restocking, it has little choice but to shut down.

[freedumb2003]

>>It was a money laundering scheme.<<

You were right the first sentence — it was influence peddling scheme.

Pure and simple.

[Spruce]

Is there any doubt at all now as to what these people were doing?

Lock her up!

[Buckeye McFrog]

Q. What does the Clinton Global Initiative have in common with Ringling Brothers Barnum and Bailey Circus?

A. Both went out-of-business in the Spring of 2017.

Q. How were they different?

A. The circus smelled better.

[Red Badger]

Gee, I wonder why the funds are ‘drying up’?........I mean, with all the GOOD stuff the CGI is doing around the world and everything................

[trebb]

Scattering the potential witnesses in hope that those most in the know escape scrutiny? I hope for their families’ sakes they are up to date on their life insurance...

[alstewartfan]

From $250,000 “speeches” down to $0.25. So sad. We have the Russians to thank for this, right? lol

[bigbob]

How are all those poor children in Haiti going to have anything to wear now?

[Don Corleone]

laying off 22 employees.

Does that include the 'returns and refunds' department?

[UCANSEE2]

It was never a charity.

Not only that, but the poor and downtrodden, in these 3rd world countries will probably be better off without the Clinton's selling the population of those nations as slaves to various Donor Corporations.

[dforest]

Heh heh, good one!

[Fhios]

I would renege on every deal possible that had it’s birth in the CGI and Foundation.

Let them sue and explain their bribes under oath.

[UCANSEE2]

(oops)

Not only that but the poor and downtrodden, in these 3rd world countries, will probably be better off without the Clintons selling the population of those nations as slaves to various Donor Corporations.

[samtheman]

No more influence to sell so donations dried up.

---

No more influence to sell so PURCHASES dried up.

They were never donations. They were fees paid in advance for the PROMISE of services to be rendered.

[Sir Napsalot]

Here’s hoping more of these hanger-ons who can NOT find jobs in DC.

Let them try to ‘earn an honesty living’ for a change.