Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Caller Asks Larry Elder About WMDs
YouTube ^ | Jan 16, 2017 | Larry Elder

Posted on 01/16/2017 4:25:30 PM PST by SeanG200

Larry Elder answers a question about an Iraqi top official supporting the idea that Iraq had WMDs and exported the majority of them to Syria. Here are the two sections in my main post dealing with General Sada:

✦ #2 Man -- http://religiopoliticaltalk.com/wmd/#sada1 ✦ #2 Man ~ a Second Time -- http://religiopoliticaltalk.com/wmd/#sada2

This will be added to the post on WMDs


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; iraq; larryelder; russia; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: WilliamIII

Now that you mention it, our Bigshots Cheney and Rumsfeld knew exactly what Saddam had because the US govt. gave the stuff to him - specifically the old chemical weapons that he used in the protracted Iran war and against the Kurds (not sure if that is disinformation, too). WMDs became the catch-all phrase to make We the Peasants think Saddam had nukes, which he didn’t or he would have used them to save his country. War criminals is an accurate label for the Bushes, the Clintons, Obama, Deep State, the Globalists in the EU, and their Puppetmasters for starting and maintaining the Mega-war machine. These people truly are the Deplorables.


61 posted on 01/16/2017 10:19:46 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

I agree, but believe this is even worse than Vietnam and still hasn’t even begun to be fully played out. This is a fight of Good vs. Evil and our govt. has not been on the right side for a very long time.


62 posted on 01/16/2017 10:24:26 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Bullish

i saw what you said- thought you might like that info if you weren’t aware of it just for your own edification- not theirs- many on this site claim there were no WMD’s- info like what i posted is invaluable to counter such claims- whether they admit it or not


63 posted on 01/17/2017 12:41:24 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: ETL
I have NO doubt Saddam had WMDs... It seems every nation on God's green earth has them. George W. Bush had a responsibility to address to ‘we the people’ what was found. He did not, and would not. I expected more out of Bush and Cheney. I see them now as colossal failures that paved the road for Obama/Clinton to transform this nation. You do know the road to .ell is paved with good intentions?
64 posted on 01/17/2017 12:54:10 AM PST by Just mythoughts (Jesus said Luke 17:32 Remember Lot's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; ifinnegan
Wendle has tons of common sense, and is a very good conservative with a good handle on the real world.

Wendle is a deranged Putinista. NO genuine conservative or patriot is a fan of KGB Putin, which he/she is. One of many on this site now. Can't understand why these creeps are permitted to stay here doing what they do, as obvious as it is.

65 posted on 01/17/2017 1:23:15 AM PST by ETL (On the road to America's recovery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

OK


66 posted on 01/17/2017 1:38:05 AM PST by Bullish (May as well just rename Hollywood---> Hypocrite city)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
Let’s see. Saddam had WMDs - but instead of using them to defend his life and his regime, he sent them out of the country, and decided to be killed without defending himself.

In light of what appears to be the facts, this reason really holds no water.

Probably a better question would be, why would we attack Iraq if we knew he had WMDs and he used them before on his own people ?

If he had them, at what point should he have used them ?
and where would he have used them ? when he used them, what would be the response of the rest of the world ?

are you willing to believe sadaam ?
He said he kept up the facade and kicked the inspectors out of Iraq cause he was afraid Iran would find out he didn't have WMD.

http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB279/index.htm

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Global-News/2009/0702/why-saddam-hussein-lied-about-iraqs-weapons-of-mass-destruction

A person has used a gun before and continues to pretend he has a gun, do you ignore him ?
67 posted on 01/17/2017 5:14:46 AM PST by stylin19a (Hey obamas-it's Ray Charles time - "Hit the Road Jack"...you know the rest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WilliamIII
I don't have the exact quotes or how they parsed their words as politicians do to blunt political attacks but if they did lie, then it was the latter in saying there were no WMD’s in order to mitigate the damage of being perceived as being caught in a lie that was the basis for sacrificing the lives of so many American troops.

No, there were WMD’s but they were moved to humiliate Bush and to stem the tide of American patriotism. There's one thing the Democrats cannot tolerate if they want to keep power and that's a united America and there's nothing that accomplishes that like an illegitimate war. The Russians were in on it as well as the Democrats, working together, abetted by the UN. I'm sure McCain was in on it as well, Bush's old political rival.

68 posted on 01/17/2017 7:23:38 AM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

see post number 59- There were wmd’s- even the NYT of all publications admitted there were because the evidence was overwhelming evidence that Iraq had them and hid them or moved them out of country before America got there- The CIA report also admitted this fact- begrudgingly- you can find that report online if so inclined-

These munitions and wmds were not old- they were not ineffective- they were the real deal- over 5000 were found buried- with many many more that were never found very likely-


69 posted on 01/17/2017 9:06:22 AM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ETL; WENDLE

Better to prefer Putin over Castro
(preferred by current admin)
Better to prefer Putin over Ayatollah
(preferred by current admin)
Better to prefer Putin over Chinese leadership
(Russia is not screwing United States with $500 Billion trade deficit every year)
Better to prefer Putin over Merkel
(Putin is not importing million unvetted Muslims)
Better to prefer Putin over France
(France now has more Muslim babies being born than indigenous French)

Wise to get along with Russia who has more nukes, more ICBM’s, highest oil & natural gas exports in the world, and is willing and able to fight radical Islam.

I know facts are a bitch.

But democrats hate Putin because and have gone berserk over exposure of DNC emails & collusion with leftist media, because they claim Putin did it. I have not seen any evidence of that. Have you? Care to post it here?


70 posted on 01/17/2017 10:18:46 AM PST by entropy12 (80 hours and counting for Obama to become history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
On the other hand N. Korea is headed by a crazy man who has openly said he will attack United States with nukes, unless we give in to his demands.

Not terribly likely. The greater strategic threat from NK is selling WMDs to other nations and/or terrorist organizations. I would argue that's far more dangerous than being a direct threat as a nation. It's relatively easy to keep one nation contained. It's very difficult to halt numerous state and non-state entities in the same way.

71 posted on 01/17/2017 10:22:10 AM PST by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater

Much more likely in comparison to Sadddam’s ability to deliver his puny chemical WMD’s to US soil.

And yes, starving N.Korea will sell anything they have.


72 posted on 01/17/2017 10:27:12 AM PST by entropy12 (80 hours and counting for Obama to become history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

This blaming Putin is a diversion from the reality that the leftists got their clock cleaned because they were exposed as rigging against Sanders and giving the debate questions to HILLARY. But worse, they exposed the Clinton foundations as the subterfuge used to bribe Clinton. Now instead of saying we need to clean up— they lie about the Russians aided by Trump hater John McCain. No body buys this Red Herring. It is now laughable. The real focus is now on can we get Hillary indicted for government security of document violations and taking and promoting bribes or will obozo giver her Presidential Clemency. Don’t you know that she is sweating it big time with her head under her pillow.


73 posted on 01/17/2017 10:36:04 AM PST by WENDLE (Lewis boycotted the Bush inaugauration!! Lewis is just a RACISTS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Bush should have done a news conference with a stockpile of them without telling the press ahead of time that they would be there.


74 posted on 01/18/2017 11:49:42 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson