Posted on 12/06/2017 3:57:50 AM PST by smileyface
Got it?
From what I’ve gleaned, the StZok-oid was fired primarily leaking inside information on the Mannafort raid to WAPO. The Message was just the public consumption version.
Bring onto them to bear the pressures they wield so freely like middle school girls.
He is not fired but instead in charge of FBI personnel and associated records. Which really means he has been put in charge of shutting down any agents who may talk about the cancer at the FBI/DOJ.
At least we have an honest Republican in Nunes on the House side, notwithstanding efforts by Schiff and his cohorts to shut him down; Nunes demanded the information on Strozk from Mueller three months ago and has followed up with repeated requests - nothing, go fly a kite. On the Senate side, I haven’t heard a peep out of Republican Senator Burr, the head of their investigative committee; instead, we hear constantly from the first class phony Mark Warner, who although he is in the minority, appears to act as Chairthing in the absence of any protest by Burr.
'They Should All Step Aside': Ingraham Says Mueller Deputy Represented Clinton Foundation
The agent, Peter Strzok, is considered one of the most experienced and trusted F.B.I. counterintelligence investigators.
That’s a problem.
Nunes has earned the AG job if he wants it and can do it,
This is a massive coverup and TREASON against
the US Constitution by the ClintonFoundation
and Mueller (its paid agent) and McCabe (its paid
agent through his wife) and many others.
Why?
So that uranium could be given to N. Korea and
Iran to nuke American cities.
If they are not indicted, either civil war
or their-initiated nuclear holocaust is coming.
The Mueller investigation isn’t just tainted, it’s poisoned with partisanship.
“So Clinton/Huma lie to FBI about a crime = no crime. Flynn lies to FBI about no crime = crime. “
I agree with your assessment but I have an explanation. If you are talking to a liberal, you know whatever they say reflects how they see reality. Therefore anything they say, although it may be objectively wrong, reflects the reality as they see it. Therefore, as far as they and their vision of reality see it, whatever they said that may be objectively incorrect, is not, in fact, a lie.
Conservatives see reality as, say, an objective observer would see it. Therefore if they say something that does not comport with that objective reality, it is a lie.
For a liberal to say the sky is orange when the color chart says blue, is not a lie. But if a conservative says orange and the chart says blue, it is a lie. See?
He is not fired but instead in charge of FBI personnel and associated records!
These are the records congress have been asking for?? OMG, More corruption, send in the Marines!
Hmmmm... sentence 2 pretty much refutes the concept in sentence one, doesn't it?
It’s treasonous.
John Harington
btt
Yep, another straight shooter.
Its treasonous.
Let’s hope this exposure of not just one corrupt FBI agent in Mueller’s inquisition, but multiple corrupt agents (Lisa Page, I’m looking at you...) leads to the collapse of this farce of an investigation. Better yet, it leads to the prosecution of the prosecutors for abuse of authority under color of law.
“In yet another blow to Muellers investigation into alleged Russian interference...”
There is no investigation into Russian interference. Mueller is fabricating evidence to impeach. People on our side better figure that out quick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.