Skip to comments.
EO Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
White House ^
| 12/21/2017
| President Donald J Trump
Posted on 12/21/2017 11:47:36 AM PST by gubamyster
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: PA Engineer
Schadenfreude
My country tis of thee,
Progressive misery;
heres to their tears!
Meanwhile in flyover,
home of Deplorables,
life is endurable,
for at least 3 more years.
Trump has the retaliatory punch of Nixon,
the loquaciousness of Reagan,
the steel spine of Eisenhower,
and a practical vision never before seen in the White House.
21
posted on
12/21/2017 1:38:08 PM PST
by
sparklite2
(I hereby designate the ongoing kerfuffle Diddle-Gate.)
To: gubamyster
I'm not great at Legalese, but I think the TL;DR of this is:
If President Trump thinks you did something to hurt this country, President Trump will freeze any asset of yours falling within his purview, and then start looking for other ways to F*** YOU UP.I approve of this message. And I love this President.
To: gubamyster
(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;
Anyone seen the list of persons?
23
posted on
12/21/2017 4:40:39 PM PST
by
exit82
(The opposition has already been Trumped!)
To: Lurker
To: gubamyster
Well, now we know what Sessions has been doing.
Human trafficking rings?
Who an ague *for* them (except the kiddie-diddlers in the upper tiers of Europe)?
And, it give The GE TrumpTM either an in, or leverage, over all kinds of groups and individuals who were opposed to him and to the US on other grounds.
25
posted on
12/21/2017 5:46:20 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: exit82
See post #4 or #24 on this same thread.
To: Lurker
Where is the Annex? See post #4 or #24 ion this same thread.
To: gubamyster
Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
The swamp can't advance each other multimillion dollar loans or play shell games to hide the money.
I wouldn't want to be a wine bottle anywhere NEAR Hillary and a large-screen TV right now..
28
posted on
12/21/2017 6:03:10 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: sparklite2
29
posted on
12/21/2017 6:39:45 PM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
To: gubamyster
To: gubamyster; Bodleian_Girl
Thanks—I missed it before.
Bodleian_Girl was kind enough to send me a link.
31
posted on
12/21/2017 6:58:26 PM PST
by
exit82
(The opposition has already been Trumped!)
To: Jane Long
Thanks! There’s more at my profile.
32
posted on
12/21/2017 7:03:53 PM PST
by
sparklite2
(I hereby designate the ongoing kerfuffle Diddle-Gate.)
To: PrairieLady2
No need to speculate. There's a
FAQ
33
posted on
12/21/2017 8:49:15 PM PST
by
Chuckster
("Them Rag Heads just ain't rational" Curly Bartley 1973)
To: gubamyster
34
posted on
12/21/2017 10:14:26 PM PST
by
BykrBayb
(Lung cancer free since 11/9/07. Colon cancer free since 7/7/15. Obama free since 1/20/17. PTL ~ Þ)
To: epluribus_2
I “thunked” about it a bit.
Here is something no one has mentioned.
It gives Trump everything he needs to seize our uranium back.
I agree that Soros, the Clintoons, Rich, etc are screwed when reading this EO as well as is the “Deep State”.
To: RegulatorCountry
Magnitsky Act has to do with the Russia sanctions and Russia’s response, halting adoptions of Russian children....
36
posted on
12/22/2017 12:10:54 AM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
To: gubamyster
37
posted on
12/22/2017 4:14:53 AM PST
by
I_be_tc
To: piasa
Seems I recall there being some controversy over those adoptions in Russia to begin with, allegations of abuse.
To: gubamyster
Is this part of the results of Muellers investigation?
39
posted on
12/22/2017 8:36:13 AM PST
by
stockpirate
(I've been blocked on FB for posting true stories about Mueller & sex claims aginst Trump)
To: stockpirate
Is this part of the results of Muellers investigation? No. From what I am reading, and believe me I am no expert, it seems to be a precursor to going after the Clinton Crime Family. I am hoping what I am reading is true.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson