Largely accurate, but not verified by our own intel?
I saw no less than 5 Democrats and/or their operatives out spin the Nunes Memo today, and this is the one probably receiving less attention.
You know, Americans are reminded of the scenario by shinning a light under the rock, and you see cockroaches scrambling every which way.
can’t hardly think of where such an explicit statement could be taken out of context.
Quigley, another IL/Chicago Combiner Crook like Zero and Hillary.
The dossier tale is another Democrat sh1tshow
I wish Quigley would go Down Under.
And I don’t mean to Australia...
Unless as dingo food.
They’re stalling for time while Mueller gets ready to Storm the White House ,LOL
And if they are concerned about revealing sources and methods, shouldn't they be concerned that a former British spy had co-opted their sources and methods?
Nobody on the House intelligence committee made this statement up. This came from Comey's own testimony before the U.S. Senate committee in June of 2017.
So how does a dossier go from being verified and accurate enough to be use for a FISA warrant application in October 2016 to being "unverified" 2-3 months later?
We are missing the 800 lb. gorilla in the room, concentrating instead on banana peels. We are overlooking the fact that spying on an opposition candidate should NEVER be allowed for ANY reason.
Moreover, spying on American citizens, for whatever reason, needs to be stopped.
“...protecting sources and methods...”
Pathetic lie, closely akin to “I can’t comment on that due to an ongoing investigation”.
There are no sources and methods because this was not cloak and dagger. The source was Hillary Clinton and the method was deception.
Does anyone think that Nunes would be so stupid as to manufacture lies out of whole cloth when the source material can be declassified on notice? And will the democrat memo contain information at complete odds with the first memo? For example: The dossier was verified? The dossier was not used at all? McCabe swore that he did not sign any warrants? etc. Or, best of all, the judge was in fact told the dossier was opposition political BS and still signed off on it.
"Why, my back was to the wall, shirttails on fire and the bill collector was at the door. It was like walking through a fire in a gasoline suit. A frog, sidepockets and a handgun! Those ****ing freepers, why ... " (deteriorates into incoherent gibberish & deleted expletives)No way to prove it, but that is perfectly in line with the gist of McCabe's testimony. If the FBI doesn't apply for a FISA warrant, none will issue.
Based on the way the issue is presented, we leap to the conclusion that the "issue/no issue" decision is for the judge, and depends on the contents of the dossier. But maybe the "issue/no issue" decision is earlier in the process, at the FBI/DOJ.
Hmmm.... Mike Quigley... one of the eight morons in congress who demanded that their staffers [the Awans] - be granted a security clearance? That Quigley?
So the FBI and the idiot left are claiming that we should spy on an opposition campaign that claims Trump had hookers pee all over him in Russia. We get the Secret US Court to go along.
Sure, why not.
Liberals, your day in hell will be here on earth.
If the dossier was accurate then why did the FBI cut Steele loose and refuse to pay him?
If the dossier is “largely accurate”, WHAT ARE THEY FREAKIN CRYING ABOUT????
Release the transcript of the relevant part of McCabe's testimony and settle it once and for all.
When ANY Democrat talks, I just assume he’s LYING! It’s what they do!!
Great. Let’s release the transcripts.
Trumpmas: where all the DC cherry trees are decorated with your favorite lying Demoscum....
The DEMONRATS have started their campaign of lies to cover for the Deep State traitors. A pox on them all.