Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Rand Paul Confirms Peter Strzok and Lisa Page Retain FBI Top Secret Security Clearances
Conservative Treehouse ^ | April 11, 2018 | Sundance

Posted on 04/11/2018 12:24:07 PM PDT by detective

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: detective

They should be on suspension, sitting in cells at Leavenworth.


21 posted on 04/11/2018 12:37:52 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Apoplectic is where we want them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TallahasseeConservative

If you fire them, then you cannot compel cooperation with the IG’s office. Just like a cop, if you resign or retire, you can tell Internal Affairs to take a flying leap.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I’m not sure if you are kidding or on acid.


22 posted on 04/11/2018 12:38:08 PM PDT by shelterguy (Bigdeal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: proust
Jeff Sessions has been AG for 1 year, 2 months, 2 days.

Not really.

23 posted on 04/11/2018 12:39:22 PM PDT by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: proust

I thought Jeff Sessions recused himself only from the Trump/Russia allegations of collusion, I didn’t think he was recusing himself from the Hillary/Russia Collusion.


24 posted on 04/11/2018 12:39:49 PM PDT by tsowellfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

Uhhh not sure what you mean? I’ve been in Law Enforcement for over 25 years and have been a PBA delegate, if you are no longer employed by an agency, you have no duty to cooperate with an Internal Affairs investigation.


25 posted on 04/11/2018 12:40:02 PM PDT by TallahasseeConservative (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TallahasseeConservative

“”””if you are no longer employed by an agency, you have no duty to cooperate with an Internal Affairs investigation.”””

What internal affairs investigation? It’s a CRIMINAL investigation.

In your hazy way of thinking do you think you are untouchable because you quit?


26 posted on 04/11/2018 12:42:35 PM PDT by shelterguy (Bigdeal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Bol!

Good one, though it took me a minute.


27 posted on 04/11/2018 12:43:19 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: falcon99

Removing a clearance is a big deal...the fact they are maintained means the due date for revaluation of the clearances has not occurred and they are active employees..thus active clearences. .the real question is can they hop on a system and view classified data or attend meetings with classified data in them...

Answer is prolly not...and I doubt when it comes time to renew those clearances.. it won’t happen..

Its just data to manipulate a position and to make some people look like they care...


28 posted on 04/11/2018 12:43:32 PM PDT by Article10 (Roger That)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: detective

Sessions vouched for them


29 posted on 04/11/2018 12:44:21 PM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Okay. This astonishes me.


30 posted on 04/11/2018 12:44:28 PM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Batman11

Bull they are clintonistas all the way.


31 posted on 04/11/2018 12:46:01 PM PDT by boomop1 (Term limits is the only way to change this failed government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: detective

Having a clearance isn’t that important. It’s the access that would concern me; I assume their access to all things sensitive has been squelched?


32 posted on 04/11/2018 12:47:24 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Formerly SandyInSeattle cuz I moved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Article10

‘the real question is can they hop on a system and view classified data’

What’s stopping them?


33 posted on 04/11/2018 12:47:34 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono h)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

If they have been flipped, and are cooperating, perhaps by the book, they need the security clearances to view documents. Which documents? The ones that show crimes have been committed.


34 posted on 04/11/2018 12:47:51 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obadiah

Ah, you beat me to it.


35 posted on 04/11/2018 12:48:04 PM PDT by Not A Snowbird (Formerly SandyInSeattle cuz I moved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

But the investigation has not reached them yet, as far as we know. The best chance to get info from them, it to make them subject to the IG and have them testify. Once you come after them criminally, they’ll lawyer up. I was referring to a police IAB investigation. Very often dirty cops will resign rather than cooperate with IAB and face internal discipline. In order to get them on corruption charges, you have to go after them criminally and then they have all the rights and privileges of any other citizen.


36 posted on 04/11/2018 12:48:27 PM PDT by TallahasseeConservative (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TallahasseeConservative

So if there was a dirty cop who took bribes, stabbed people who wouldn’t pay up etc. it would be best to keep him on full duty, full pay and full access to all records for a few years instead of firing him. Got it.


37 posted on 04/11/2018 12:51:51 PM PDT by shelterguy (Bigdeal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: detective

MarQ


38 posted on 04/11/2018 12:54:10 PM PDT by demsux (Ahhh...what county you think this is...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shelterguy

No. You’re missing my point. If there was a cop doing that, once he knew he was under investigation by IAB, he’ll resign or retire. Then you have to go after him criminally. The fact that neither Strozk nor Page has done that, makes me wonder whether or not they are cooperating. If they are, that’s reason enough to keep them around.


39 posted on 04/11/2018 12:54:48 PM PDT by TallahasseeConservative (Isaiah 40:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TallahasseeConservative

Uhhh not sure what you mean? I’ve been in Law Enforcement for over 25 years and have been a PBA delegate, if you are no longer employed by an agency, you have no duty to cooperate with an Internal Affairs investigation.

You might not cooperate with an IA investigation, but resigning wouldn’t give you a get-out-of-jail free card for past crimes.


40 posted on 04/11/2018 12:55:28 PM PDT by Flick Lives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson